Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sonu vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7203/2025 SONU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Charul Chaudhary, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Mohit. Mr. K.P. Singh, Advocate.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 311/2024 dated 13.05.2024, registered at Police Station Khyala, District West, New Delhi, under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, on the ground of settlement.2. Mr. Charul Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.4. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case, which shall be considered by the learned Sessions Court in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J MARCH 30, 2026/SS/KA/This is a digital...
M/S Jaina Mobile India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 24th September, 2025 Pronounced on: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on:30th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 1225/2024 JAINA MARKETING AND ASSOCIATES .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITH + W.P.(C) 1291/2024 M/S JAINA MOBILE INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITH + W.P.(C) 1297/2024 INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITHDigitally Signed W.P.(C...
Jaina Marketing and Associates vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 24th September, 2025 Pronounced on: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on:30th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 1225/2024 JAINA MARKETING AND ASSOCIATES .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITH + W.P.(C) 1291/2024 M/S JAINA MOBILE INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITH + W.P.(C) 1297/2024 INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITHDigitally Signed W.P.(C...
Anil Poddar vs MD. Usman Director
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 394/2024 & CM APPL. 55424/2024, CM APPL. ANIL PODDAR .....Appellant Through: Ms. Devahuti Pathak, AdvocateversusMD. USMAN DIRECTOR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.03.20261. Today, the Respondent remains unrepresented.2. With the sincere efforts of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, settlement has been arrived at between the parties and a settlement agreement dated 23.09.2025 has been signed by both the parties.3. The learned counsel representing the Appellant submits that theaforesaid settlement has been implemented, and in terms of the said settlement, an amount of 7,50,000/- has been paid, which has been accepted by the Respondent.4. Keeping in view the aforesaid position, the present Appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement, which shall form the part of the decree. Pending applications also stand disp...
Arjit Kumar@Ajit Diwan vs State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6284/2025 ARJIT KUMAR@AJIT DIWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Arvind Kumar, Ms. Ritika Davis Franklin and Mr. Kartik Dhingra, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan. SI Amit Kumar, CI/Special Cell.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 216/2023 dated 12.08.2023, registered at Police Station Special Cell, New Delhi, under Sections 419/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 12 of the Passports Act, 1967.2. At the outset, Mr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks liberty to withdraw this petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner before the learned Sessions Court.3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.4. It is made clear that this...
Gd Kataria vs Avl Leasing & Finance Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 594/2010 GD KATARIA .....AppellantversusAVL LEASING & FINANCE LTD .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal seeks the following prayers:-a) Summon the trial court record pertaining to the impugned judgment/decree ; b) Set-aside the Impugned Judgment / Decree dated 23.01.2010, passed by the Ld. Trial court in Suit No.179/09; b) Pass any other further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.3. None appears on behalf of the appellant.4. Vide order dated 15.02.2011, learned Predecessor Bench had observedas under:- + CM NO.1830/2011 This is an application filed by the respondent seeking directions of the Court to the appellant. Application stands dismissed as not pressed, however, it is made clear that there is no stay in the matter and the respondent/applicant is free to execute the decree in accordance with law....
M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.12.2025Judgment delivered on: 30.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~+ W.P.(C) 15970/2023, CM APPL. 64257/2023 + W.P.(C) 13572/2024, CM APPL. 56719/2024 + W.P.(C) 13553/2024, CM APPL. 56682/2024 + W.P.(C) 14898/2024, CM APPL. 62466/2024 M/S HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD. .....PetitionerversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Datar and Mr. Tarun Gulati, Senior Advocates with Mr. Kishore Kunal, Ms. Ankita Prakash and Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Indruj Singh Rai SSC, Mr.Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh JSCs and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Burman, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTSigned By:PRADEEP WP(C) No.15970/2023 & Connected Page 1 of 108V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.S.No...
Dr. Shashi Kant Godara vs M/S Silvermaple Healthcare Services Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3912/2024 & CM APPL. 68853/2024 DR. SHASHI KANT GODARA .....Petitioner Through: Mohd. Irshad, Advocate.versusM/S SILVERMAPLE HEALTHCARE SERVICES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gupta and Ms. Kavya Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.3. Accordingly, keeping in view the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 30, 2026/nd/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:16:20...
Vinod Singh Bhadoriya @ Vishal vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3553/2025 & CRL.M.A. 27949/2025 VINOD SINGH BHADORIYA @ VISHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarthak Maggon, Ms. Tanvi Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP. SI Jitendra Yadav, PS-Mohan Garden.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 0259/2019, dated 22.06.2019, lodged at Police Station Mohan Garden, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC]. A charge-sheet has been subsequently filed on 04.09.2019, whereupon charges under Section 201, 394 and 411 IPC have been added.2. After some arguments, Mr. Sarthak Maggon, learned counsel forthe applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application, without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the applicant before the ...
Basant@Basanta vs the State(Gnctd)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3550/2025 BASANT@BASANTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Narender Mukhi, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (GNCTD) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP. Mr. Rohit Priya Ranjan, Advocate (DHCLSC) for Complainant. Insp. Mantosh Singh, PS Shalimar Bagh & Insp. Bhanu Pratap.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of this application under Section 483 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 8/2022 dated 02.01.2022, registered at Police Station Shalimar Bagh, District North-West, New Delhi, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, has handed up an updated status report, which is taken on record.3. After some hearing, Mr. Narender Mukhi, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this bail application, but seeks directions for expedi...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »