Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd Anas vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2370/2025 MOHD ANAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umang Tyagi, Mr. Siddharth Sharma and Mr. Zuber Ali, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Prahlad, Special CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 320/2024 ofPolice Station Special Cell for offence under Section 22/29 of NDPS Act. 1.1. This bail application came up for the first hearing on 07.07.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant, oninstructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court subsequent...
Bharat Bhushan vs Smt. Mamta Sharma and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~29 & 30* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIRFA 497/2025 CM APPL. 33479/2025 (stay), CM APPL. 1441/2026 (for early hearing) BHARAT BHUSHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Radhe Shyam Sharma, Advocate.versusSMT. MAMTA SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Esq., Advocate. + RFA 592/2025, CM APPL. 39482/2025 (stay), CM APPL. 1454/2026 (for early hearing) BHARAT BHUSHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Radhe Shyam Sharma, Advocate.versusSMT. MAMTA SHARMA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Esq., Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel on behalf of the Appellant, on instructions, submits that the decree has been executed and the Appeals have become infructuous.2. Learned counsel on behalf of the Appellant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw these Appeals.3. The Appeals are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of Accordingly. The pending Applications also stand disposed of....
D.G.O.F. Employees Association and Anr. vs Shri Giridhar Aramane and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~3 and 5* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1091/2024 and CM APPLs.53512/2024, 63297/2024,(3) D.G.O.F. EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND ANR......Petitioners SHRI GIRIDHAR ARAMANE AND ORS .....Respondents + CONT.CAS(C) 31/2025 and CM APPL.59608/2025(5) ALL INDIA ORDNANCE FACTORIES SCHEDULED CASTESAND SCHEDULED TRIBES EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS .....Petitioners SHRI SANJEEV KUMAR IAS .....Respondent Through: Presence: Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv., Ms. Aishwarya Kumar and Ms. Laxmi, Advs. for petitioner in item nos.3 and 5. Mr. M.C. Dhingra, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tashriq Ahmad, Ms. Farzeen Iqbal, Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. for impleading applicant in CM-63297/2024. Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Ritwik Sharma and Mr. Ishith Arora, Advs. for Sharad Mehra in item nos.3 and 5. Ms. Manisha Agarwal Narain, CGSC, Mr. Siddhant Soni, Mr. Nipun Jain, Ms. Dimpi Vaid, Mr. Rishabh Dev, Advs. along with Mr. Abhijit Deb, Mr. S. N. Saha, Mr. Ashish Paul from Directorate of O...
Vandana Rathore vs Bar Council of India Through Secretary & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11492/2025 & CM APPL. 47115/2025, CM APPL. 47116/2025 VANDANA RATHORE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Beni Prasad Rathore, Adv. with Ms. Vandana Rathore, Petitioner-In-PersonversusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 30, 2026/ASThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 12:04:46...
Delhi Development Authority and Ors vs Rajinder Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2131/2022, CM APPL. 6139/2022 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, Mr. Manish and Ms. Nidhi, Advs.versusRAJINDER KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nishchaya Nigam, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.03.20261. Through the present petition, the Petitioners have challengedthe correctness of order dated 14.08.2019 (hereafter impugned order), passed in O.A./100/4050/2014, whereby the learned Central Administrative Tribunal had partly allowed the original application filed by the Respondent and reduced his punishment.2. Briefly stated, the Respondent was working as a JuniorEngineer in DDA and Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him for alleged lapses which led to substandard construction. A charge memorandum dated 19.03.1998 was issued against the Respondent, wherein four charges were framed against him on account of no ...
Garima vs the Foreigners Regional Registration Officer & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9485/2025 GARIMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar Yadav and Ms. Krishna Srinivasan, Advocates.versusTHE FOREIGNERS REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICER & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, CGSC and Mr. Aviraj Pandey, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. The instant petition stand dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 30, 2026 NcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 12:00:40...
Insp (CM) Naveen Kumar (No 009910015) vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14611/2023 CM APPL. 58120/2023 INSP (CM) NAVEEN KUMAR (NO 009910015) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber and Mr. Nikunj Arora, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, SPC, Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Poonam Shukla and Ms. Reba Jena Mishra, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 30.03.20261. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, learned counsel for the petitioner states thatprayers, as made in the writ petition, have been satisfied inasmuch as the petitioner has been appointed as a Head Coach vide office memorandum dated 16.02.2026 and as such, the present petition has become infructuous.2. Taking the office memorandum dated 16.02.2026 filed by Mr. Chhibber on record, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J MARCH 30, 2026/srTh...
Arjit Kumar Alias Ajit Diwan vs State Through Sho Ps Special Cell
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3784/2023 ARJIT KUMAR ALIAS AJIT DIWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Arvind Kumar, Ms. Ritika Davis Franklin, Mr. Kartik Dhingra, Mr. Randeep Pundir and Mr. Ravi Thakur, Advocates.versusSTATE THROUGH SHO PS SPECIAL CELL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present application under Section 482 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 216/2023 dated 12.08.2023, registered at Police Station Special Cell, New Delhi, under Sections the Passports Act, 1967.2. I have heard Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.3. The prosecution has filed two status reports, which are on record.4. The prosecution case, as revealed in the status reports, may be summar...
Smt Krishan Chaudhary vs Vivek Gupta and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 390/2024 SMT KRISHAN CHAUDHARY .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar and Mr. Praphul Chandan, Advs. along with appellant in-person.versusVIVEK GUPTA AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Avanish Kumar, Adv. for R-1 along with R-1 in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 30.03.2026 CM APPL. 20022/20261. This application has been filed seeking disposal of the appeal on the basis of a settlement arrived at between the parties out of Court, for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- to be paid by appellant to respondent no.1.2. A demand draft for the said amount has been handed over by appellant to respondent no.1, who is present in Court. Both parties are present in Court, as identified by their respective counsels.3. Demand draft no. 858372 drawn on Indian Bank has been received by respondent no.1.4. In this view of the matter, application is allowed and disposed of, accordingly. MAC.APP. 390/20241. In terms of the settlement arri...
Union of India and Another vs Vivek Agarwal and Another
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13287/2022, CM APPL. 40289/2022 UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra and Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advs.versusVIVEK AGARWAL AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Praveen Kaushik, Ms. Sakshi Saugat, Advs. for R-1. Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC- GNCTD Services with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that,during the pendency of the present Writ Petition, the Respondent No.1 has been deputed in the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) and in view thereof, he has instructions not to press this Petition.2. He, however, submits that the legal issue arising in the present case with regard to interference with the order of transfer and...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »