Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aashish Bachchas vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1238/2026, CRL.M.A. 9695/2026 AASHISH BACHCHAS .....Applicant Through: Mr. Bhanu Malhotra, Adv.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh, Ms. Approva Khosla and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs. SI- Praveen Kumar Yadav, PS: Chanakyapuri SI- Dharambir, PS: Parliament StreetCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 read withSection 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in FIR No.91/2025 registered under Sections 281/105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at PS: Chankya Puri.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks towithdraw the present bail application with liberty to take appropriate steps, as available, in accordance with law.3. The present bail application, alongwith the pending applicatio...
Rajasthan Hockey Association vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4143/2026 and CM APPL. 20244/2026, CM APPL.Date of Decision: 30.03.2026IN THE MATTER OF:RAJASTHAN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yash Chaturvedi, Mr. Himanshu Sihag, Mr. Aman Maheshwari, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Rohan Poddar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)1. The petition is for the following relief:(a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No. 2 & 3, to refrain from using the word Rajasthan or any other similar word depicting the State of Rajasthan while naming/describing any participant Organisation/ Association/Society or any other such body, other than the Petitioner herein, in all the forthcoming national and other competitive hockey tournaments;2. The petition is for directions to re...
Dr. Rimpi Khillan Singh vs Indraprastha College of Women and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2006/2020, CM APPL. 7088/2020 & CM APPL. 37323- 37324/2023 DR. RIMPI KHILLAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusINDRAPRASTHA COLLEGE OF WOMEN AND ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Ms. Rebina Rai and Mr. Shivam Tiwari, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi and Mr. Sachin Garg, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Anju Gupta and Mr. Bhuvan Goel, Advocates for R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.03.20261. The parties have amicably resolved their disputes and have executed aSettlement Agreement dated 24th March, 2026 before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, a copy whereof has been received from the Mediation Centre.2. Counsel for the parties confirm the settlement and submit that nofurther directions are required in the matter.3. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of in terms ofthe settlement betwee...
Rajeshwar Tyagi vs Delhi Bar Asscn
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RSA 34/2020 RAJESHWAR TYAGI .....Appellant Through: NoneversusDELHI BAR ASSCN .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Lata Sharma, Ms. Nishtha Garg, Mr. Aman sharma, Ms. Ruby Advocates for the respondent, DBA.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.03.20261. None is present on behalf of the Appellant.2. The Appeal is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MARCH 30, 2026/RSThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:56:36...
Raj Kishore Bansal vs Shyam Bihari and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RSA 76/2023, CM APPL. 19778/2023 RAJ KISHORE BANSAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. S. C. Singhal and Mr. Parth Mahajan, Advocates.versusSHYAM BIHARI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naman Jain, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.03.20261. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 read with Order XLII ofCPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant for setting aside Orders dated 14.07.2022 and 23.12.2022, whereby Suit of the Respondent / Appellant was decreed in the Sum of Rs.50,000/- along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of institution of the Suit till its realisation. In addition, Rs.12,500/- had been granted by way of compensation / damages.2. First Appeal bearing No.RCA-03/2022 was filed against the saidJudgment, whereby learned District Judge uphold the Judgment of learned Civil Court and dismissed the Appeal vide Order dated 14.07.2022. Review Petition was filed on behalf of...
Khalid @ Nazim vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1304/2025 KHALID @ NAZIM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary, Advocate (through videoconferencing).versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with Inspector Umesh Sharma and Inspector Rajesh Verma, PS Narela.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 536/2020 ofPolice Station Narela for offence under Section 302/34 of IPC read with Section 25/27 of the Arms Act. 1.1. This bail application came up for the first hearing on 04.04.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. At the outset, on being reminded by learned APP of order dated23.03.2026, passed in Bail Application N...
Shri. Surender Singh Sethi vs Smt. Ranjana Bhasin & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2304/2024 & CM APPL. 20648/2024 SHRI. SURENDER SINGH SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Michael Peter, Advocate through VC.versusSMT. RANJANA BHASIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdrawthe present petition with liberty to file an appropriate petition as there are various technical defects in the present petition.3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, withliberty as prayed for, in accordance with law. All the pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 30, 2026/MR/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from ...
Barinder Kaur vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1537/2025 BARINDER KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given).versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 02.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 10150/2026 (for amendment of the appearance marked in the order dated 23.03.2026)1. Matter taken up on mentioning.2. The judgment dated 30.03.2026 marks presence of learned seniorcounsel for accused/applicant as well as remaining learned counsel, whose presence were also recorded in order dated 23.03.2026 while concluding the final arguments, so, I find no reason to allow the present application. The application is dismissed. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J APRIL 2, 2026/ry This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:07:58...
Harshdeep Chandoke vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4515/2025 and CM APPL. 20889/2025 HARSHDEEP CHANDOKE .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Adv Mr Prabhat Kumar, Adv Ms Anamika Thakur, Adv Mr Abhinav Verma, Advocates for UOI. Mr Zoheb Hossain, Spl Counsel, Mr Vivek Gurnani Panel Counsel with Mr Pranjal Tripathi adv, Mr Chinmay Anand Panigrahi Adv, Ms Tanvi jain, Advocates for ED.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. None appears for the petitioner despite the matter is called out in second round.2. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent- Directorate of Enforcement that the seizure was confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority and that the appeal is pending.3. In view thereof, it appears that the petitioner has lost the interest to pursue the instant writ petition.4. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending application, stands d...
Anandarupa Dhar vs University Grants Commission and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4639/2025 ANANDARUPA DHAR ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujjawal Gaur, Mr. Amit Shukla, Advs.versusUNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND ORS......Respondents Through: Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subhrdeep Saha, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Anamika Thakur & Mr. Abhina Verma, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Khanna SC, Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Ms. Vilakshana Dayma, Mr. Saurabh Pandey, Ms. Anshu Kumari, Advs. for NTACORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 30, 2026/ASThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 12:04:54...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »