Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Varian Medical Systems International India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4007/2026 & CM APPL. 19612/2026VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONALINDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Punj and Ms. Priyamwada Sinha, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari Senior Panel Counsel for R-1. Mr. Akash Verma, SSC, CBIC with Mrs. Aanchal Uppal and Mr. Teevra Mishra, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.03.20261. The impugned order dated 22nd December, 2025 is informed to havebeen withdrawn vide rectification order dated 17th March, 2026, which is placed on record.2. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may bepermitted to withdraw the present petition, which position of fact is not disputed by the other side.3. As such, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn in view ofaforesaid development.4. Copy of rectifica...
Sh Vikas Kumar & Anr. vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2301/2026 SH VIKAS KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Singh with Mr. Firoz Khan and Mr. Amit Rana, Advocates. P-1 in court.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Umang Gahlwat, P.S.: Kashmiri Gate. R-2 in-person. Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate for Complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9413/2026Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2301/2026By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the husband and father-in-law of the complainant (respondent No.2), seek quashing of case FIR No. 142/2024 dated 09.03.2024 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Kashmeri Gate, North District, Delhi.2. The petition is premised...
Priyanshu Beniwal vs Amity University & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4091/2026PRIYANSHU BENIWAL.....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-personversusAMITY UNIVERSITY & ANR......Respondent Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs. for R-1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.2026CM APPL. 20035/2026Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 4091/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the Respondent University to forthwith release and refund the unlawfully withheld amount of 74,500/- to the Petitioner, along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum (or such other rate as this Honble Court deems fit) calculated from 02.11.2020until the date of actual realization; b) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, orde...
Suresh Kumar vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30.03.2026 + CRL.M.C. 2351/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9543/2026 SURESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/SI Snehlata. Respondent no.2 in person.CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 1261/2015 of PoliceStation Aman Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has compromised the dispute with the petitioner.2. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that State has no objection tothis petition.3. Respondent no.2 identified by IO/SI Snehlata accepts notice.CRL.M.C.2351/2026 Page 1 of 2 pagesGIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,po...
Girish Chand & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2382/2026GIRISH CHAND & ORS......Petitioner Through: Ms. Durga Singh, Mr. Naved Khan and Mr. Chander Prakash, Advocates. Petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Ravinder Singh and W/HC Roshni. Mr. Mohit Gupta and Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocates. Respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 152/2024 datedconsequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 08.12.2022, as per Hindu rites and customs. No child is born from the abovesaid wedlock.Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 2382/2026 13. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties startedresiding separately a...
Vinod Kumar vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1026/2026 VINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Kumar Yadav and Mr. Anmol Kumar Pandey, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State. Insp. Kishore Kumar, P.S. South Rohini.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent/State, that the petitioners name be considered for premature release at the next meeting of the Sentence Review Board (SRB). Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that the petitioners case was last considered by the SRB vide its Meeting dated 21.12.2023, at which stage, his case for premature release was rejected. The petitioner has also undergone more than 21 years of actual judicial custody, not counting remis...
Bank of Baroda vs Mahender Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 671/2026 & CM APPL. 19957/2026 BANK OF BARODA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Praveena Gautam, Mr. Pawan Shukla, Ms. Tissy Annie Thomas and Mr. Rohan Bansla, Advocates.versusMAHENDER KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave towithdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.3. Keeping in view the submissions of the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMARCH 30, 2026/v/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. T...
Kamlesh vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30.03.2026 + LPA 175/2026, CM APPL. 19900/2026 & CM APPL. 19901/2026 KAMLESH .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal& Mr. Parth Mahajan, Advocates (through VC).VersusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar- Standing Counsel along with Mr. Kuljeet Singh & Mr. Razia, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIATEJAS KARIA, J. (ORAL)1. The present Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the Order dated04.02.2026 (Impugned Order) in W.P. (C) 3176/2021 (Writ Petition), whereby the Writ Petition filed by the Appellant seeking allotment of the plot by the Respondent was dismissed.2. It is the case of the Appellant that the Appellant is the widow of LateShri Sadhu Singh, who had applied for allotment of a plot of land in the year 1983 by the Respondent under EWS category. Late Shri Sadhu Singh passed away on 29.06.1996. After his death, the ...
Amit Kumar and Ors vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2336/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9504/2026AMIT KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yogesh Bansal with Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocates.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.....Respondents Through: Ms. Anoushka Sharma & Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocates for respondent no. 2 S.I. Satyadev Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 237/2022 datedproceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no.2 was solemnisedon 25.04.2021 at Delhi in accordance with Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. There is no child from such wedlock.3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties startedresiding separately and when a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, itSigned By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 2336/2026 1resulted into registration of th...
Ravi & Ors. vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2363/2026, CRL.M.A. 9618/2026 RAVI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhuvneshwar Tyagi, Advocate with petitioners in personversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Amit, PS: Bawana R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.680/2024 dated 23.10.2024 registered at PS.: Bawana, Delhi under Sections 84/316/351/3(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.07.2025 [Annexure B] arrived between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.2. Issue notice. Learned APP fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »