Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amit Kumar & Anr. vs State Through Sho & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2378/2026 and CRL.M.A. 9659/2026 AMIT KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate with Petitioners in person.versusSTATE THROUGH SHO & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with SI Raghubir Singh, PS Maya Puri Ms. Anju Gautam, Advocate for R- 2 with R-2 in personCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9659/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 2378/20261. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 86/2023 dated 27.04.2023, registered at Police Station Mayapuri under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of a settl...
Vipin Kumar & Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2324/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9460/2026VIPIN KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikas Tiwari with Ms. Ananya Tyagi, Advocates with petitioner No.1. Petitioner No.2 through V.C.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Sunita, PS Pul Prahald Pur. Ms. Rashi Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 through V.C.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.168/2022 datedproceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 21.11.2011, as per Hindu rites and customs. The couple was blessed with baby boy from the abovesaid wedlock.3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties startedresidi...
Sh Kamru Jamal vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2357/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9723/2026 SH KAMRU JAMAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Rai, Advocate via video- conferencing. Petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. Respondents Nos. 2 & 3 in person. WSI Anjali, P.S. Kanjhawala.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 222/2018 dated 03.07.2018 registered under section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Kanjhawala, Outer District Delhi.2. The petition is premised on Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)dated 03.12.2025, whereby the petitioner and respondents Nos. 2 and 3 have resolved the matter amicably.3. The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioner and ofrespondent No. ...
Irb Tumkur Chitradurga Tollway Ltd vs National Highways Authority of I ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 283/2026 & I.A. 8545/2026IRB TUMKUR CHITRADURGA TOLLWAYLTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Bharihoke, Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Sarthak Sachdev, Mr. Watan Sharma & Mr. Annamya Nanda, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Abhay Gupta, Ms. Rabaica Jaiswal & Ms. Simran Goel, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended till 30.06.2026 as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 30, 2026/haThis is a dig...
Kaushal Singh vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1242/2026 KAUSHAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kshitiz Ahuja, Mr. Vineet Nagar, Mr. Shekhar Bhatia and Mr. Kapil Chaudhary, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Udit and Inspector Sandeep, PS Ranhola .CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.2026 CRL.M.A. No. 9716-17/2026 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of.BAIL APPLN. 1242/20261. By way of this application under Section 482 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 37/2026, dated 12.01.2026, under Sections of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012, lodged at P.S. Ranhola.2. I am informed that this is the second application filed by thepetitioner herein before this Court in connection with the same FIR. TheBAIL APPLN. 1242/2026 Page 1 of 2fir...
Namita vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4069/2026 NAMITA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amandeep Singh and Ms. Monika, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIAND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, SPC with Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, G.P. for R-3/SHO with SI Sumit Singh, ICPP, P.S. DBG Road Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, ASC for MCD Mr. Prabhsahay Kaur, SC, DDA with Ms. Aditya Verma and Ms. Aryma Sharma, Advocates for STF Mr. Manu Sishodia and Ms. Hina Rajput, Advocates for R-5CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction torespondent/MCD to take appropriate action in respect of unauthorised construction being carried out at the property bearing Municipal No. 10429- 10432, situated at Gali Pathshala Wali, Manak Pura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005.2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent is making theW.P.(C) 4069/2026 Page 1 of 2aforesaid construction without any ...
Smt. Jai Shree vs Life Insurance Corporation of India and Others
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4019/2026SMT. JAI SHREE.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishank Tripathi, Advocate.versusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.04.2026CM APPL. 28289/2026(for clarification of order dated 30.03.2026)1. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 30.03.2026.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the liberty was soughtfor re-filing the petition.3. The prayer seems to be reasonable. Accordingly, the liberty isgranted to the petitioner to re-file the petition.4. With the aforesaid clarification, the application stands disposed of.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JAPRIL 28, 2026aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on ...
Pankaj Sharma vs the State (Nct of Delhi) Thorugh Sho of Ps Hauz Qazi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 187/2026, CRL.M.A. 9424/2026, CRL.M.A. 9425/2026 PANKAJ SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahesh Kumar Patel (through VC) and Mr. Omkar Sharma, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THORUGH SHO OF PS HAUZ QAZI DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates alongwith SI Omkant Yadav, P.S.- Hauz QaziCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leaveto withdraw the present petition.2. As such, the present petition alongwith pending applications isdismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JMARCH 30, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:30:41...
Indus Towers Limited vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~60 & 67* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI60. + W.P.(C) 4087/2026 with CM APPL. 20020/202667. + W.P.(C) 4119/2026 with CM APPL. 20108/2026CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petitions have been filed seeking quashing of theW.P.(C) 4087/2026 Page 1 of 2Show Cause Notices dated 4th November, 2025. In terms of the aforesaid Show Cause Notices, the petitioner has been called upon to pay license fee in terms of Section 417 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereinafter DMC Act).2. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitionersubmits that the petitioner is not liable to pay any license fee in terms of Section 417 of the DMC Act. Replies to the said Demand Notices have been sent belatedly on 25th March, 2026.3. Clearly, the aforesaid replies are yet to be considered by therespondent/MCD. Therefore, in my opinion, the present writ petitions are premature.4. In view thereof,...
Ganesh Aggarwal and Ors vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2335/2026 GANESH AGGARWAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shubham Garg, Mr. Ankur Shukla, Advs. with petitioners in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Ms. Upasana Bakshi, Advs. SI Harshvardhan Arya, PS-Farsh Bazar. Mr. Daljeet Singh, Adv. with R-2 present in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9503/2026 (Delay of 44 days in re-filing)1. By virtue of the present application, the petitioners seekcondonation of a delay of 44 days in re-filing of the present petition.2. Issue notice.3. Learned APP for the State accepts notice. He submits that he has noobjection if the present application is allowed.4. For the reasons stated in the present application, as also the noobjection given by the learned APP, the present application is allowed and the delay of 44 days...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »