Skip to content

Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 30 2026

Communication Components Antena Inc. vs Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechni ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 31st May, 2025 Pronounced on: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 1st April, 2026 + CS(COMM) 653/2019 and CC(COMM) 22/2022 COMMUNICATION COMPONENTS ANTENNA INC...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gaurav Pachnanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Mr. Aditya Goel & Ms. Avni Goel, Advs. (M: 9716746496)versusROSENBERGER HOCHFREQUENZTECHNIK GMBH & CO. KG .....Defendant No.1 PROSE TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant No.2 ROSENBERGER ASIA PACIFIC ELECTRONIC CO., LTD. .....Defendant No.3 PROSE TECHNOLOGIES (SUZHOU) CO., LTD. ....Defendant No.4 Through: Mr. Vivek Chibb, Senior Advocate with Late Mr. Varun Sharma, Mr Manish Aryan, Mr. Nishant Rai, Ms Manisha Singh, Mr. Abhai Pandey, Ms. Mansi Gupta, Mr. Siddharth, Ms. Akhya Anand, Ms. Shivani Singh, Mr. Dhruv Tandan & Ms. Anju Agarwal, Advs. (M: 9871135752) Signature Not Verified CS(COMM) 653/2019 Page 1 of 259CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SIN...


Mar 30 2026

S M Asif vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16781/2022 S M ASIF .....Petitioner Through: None.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Lalltaksh Joshi and Ms Minu Kumari, Advocates for R-1. SI Yogesh Poonia PS Rajinder Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. None appears for the petitioner despite the matter is called out in second round. None had appeared for the petitioner on earlier dates as well.2. The petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The pending application(s), if any, also stands dismissed. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 30, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:22:24...


Mar 30 2026

Pooja vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

$~9 & 10* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 12516/2019 & CM APPL. 51096/2019 POOJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek B Saharya, Adv.versusGURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri for R-1/GGSIPU + W.P.(C) 12617/2019 & CM APPL. 51579/2019 NEHA SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek B Saharya, Adv.versusGURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri for R-1/GGSIPU Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Nandini Aggarwal, Ms. Samiksha, Advs. for R-5/UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH: JASMEET SINGH, J (ORAL)1. These are writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking identical prayers, which are as follows:- (a) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction/(s) directing the respondent to allot the petitioner a seat in the Post Graduate Ayurveda Course 2019-20 session...


Mar 30 2026

Sudha Devi vs Anil Kumar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: March 18, 2026 % Pronounced on: March 30, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 6636/2022, CRL.M.A. 25851/2022 SUDHA DEVI ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prateek Kumar, Adv.VersusANIL KUMAR ....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Bhardwaj, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEJUDGMENT1. This Court is proceeding to decide the present petition filed underSection 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 wherein the petitioner seeks quashing of Criminal Complaint bearing CC NI Act No.26009/2021 entitled Anil Kumar vs. Tarun Kumar & Anr.1 pending before the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate (NI Act), Digital Court-08, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi2 as well as the summoning order dated 15.12.20213 passed therein and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom insofar as they pertain to the petitioner.2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts leading present petition is that Hereinafter referred as compliant case Hereinafter referre...


Mar 30 2026

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -15, Delhi vs Nivesh Group

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 420/2024 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -15, DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, JSC, and Mr. Rishabh Nangia, Adv.versusNIVESH GROUP .....Respondent Through: Ms Rano Jain, Mr. Venketesh Chaurasia, Ms Mansi Jain and Mr. Tanishq Ahuja, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for respondent submitted that the appeal in handscannot continue, as the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below the limits as prescribed in CBDT Circular No.5/2024 dated 15.03.2024 read with Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024.2. In this regard, learned counsel for the respondent submitted thatpursuant to the order dated 26.03.2022 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-15 (hereinafter referred to as the Authority) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961), the Assessing ...


Mar 30 2026

Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. vs Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 24th September, 2025 Pronounced on: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on:30th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 1225/2024 JAINA MARKETING AND ASSOCIATES .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITH + W.P.(C) 1291/2024 M/S JAINA MOBILE INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITH + W.P.(C) 1297/2024 INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITHDigitally Signed W.P.(C...


Mar 30 2026

Neha Sethi vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

$~9 & 10* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 12516/2019 & CM APPL. 51096/2019 POOJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek B Saharya, Adv.versusGURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri for R-1/GGSIPU + W.P.(C) 12617/2019 & CM APPL. 51579/2019 NEHA SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek B Saharya, Adv.versusGURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri for R-1/GGSIPU Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Nandini Aggarwal, Ms. Samiksha, Advs. for R-5/UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH: JASMEET SINGH, J (ORAL)1. These are writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking identical prayers, which are as follows:- (a) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction/(s) directing the respondent to allot the petitioner a seat in the Post Graduate Ayurveda Course 2019-20 session...


Mar 30 2026

Jennifer Ann Waldner vs Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs (Fore ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17340/2022 JENNIFER ANN WALDNER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (FOREIGNERS DIVISION) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Akash Mishra and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands mitigated in view of the stand taken by the respondents.2. In view of the aforesaid nothing more remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition. Accordingly, the same stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 30, 2026/ShThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 12:00:32...


Mar 30 2026

Mr.Surendera vs the State Govt.of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13619/2025 MR.SURENDERA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender kumar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Ms.Smriti S Nair, Ms.Sneha Sejwal, advocates for R- 2&3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. The petitioner in the instant writ petition prays for directions to therespondents to reconsider the compensation application of the petitioner and enhance the maximum compensation amount to the extent of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh only) with interest.2. The Court, under similar circumstances, has directed the concerned District Victim Compensation Committee [DVCC] to reconsider the grievance of the victim.3. In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that the concerned DVCC toreconsider the case of the petitioner for enhancement of the compensation in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy ...


Mar 30 2026

M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.12.2025Judgment delivered on: 30.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~+ W.P.(C) 15970/2023, CM APPL. 64257/2023 + W.P.(C) 13572/2024, CM APPL. 56719/2024 + W.P.(C) 13553/2024, CM APPL. 56682/2024 + W.P.(C) 14898/2024, CM APPL. 62466/2024 M/S HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD. .....PetitionerversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Datar and Mr. Tarun Gulati, Senior Advocates with Mr. Kishore Kunal, Ms. Ankita Prakash and Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Indruj Singh Rai SSC, Mr.Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh JSCs and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Burman, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTSigned By:PRADEEP WP(C) No.15970/2023 & Connected Page 1 of 108V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.S.No...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial