Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Reepak Kansal vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~37 to 39* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30.03.2026 IN THE MATTERS OF: + W.P.(C) 11301/2025 REEPAK KANSAL .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Adv P.S Singh CGSC, Adv Shivangi Sharma, Adv Mrityunjay Kumar Singh, Adv Rajneesh k Sharma, Advs. for R-1&2. Roy, Advocates for R-3. + W.P.(C) 18145/2025 DR. ADISH C AGGARWALA .....Petitioner 17:02:39 Page 1 of 6 KUMAR KAURAV UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Amit Tiwari CGSC Ms Ayushi Srivastava Mr Ayush Tanwar Adv Mr Kushagra Malik Adv. for UoI. Roy, Advocates for LLC/R-3. + W.P.(C) 18178/2025 ROHIT PANDEY .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr Amit Tiwari CGSC Ms Ayushi Srivastava Mr Ayush Tanwar Adv Mr Arpan Narwal Mr Kushagra Malik Adv. for UoI. Roy, Advocates for LLC/R-3. 17:02:39 Page 2 of 6 KUMAR KAURAVCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)1. The grievance raised in these...
M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.12.2025Judgment delivered on: 30.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~+ W.P.(C) 15970/2023, CM APPL. 64257/2023 + W.P.(C) 13572/2024, CM APPL. 56719/2024 + W.P.(C) 13553/2024, CM APPL. 56682/2024 + W.P.(C) 14898/2024, CM APPL. 62466/2024 M/S HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD. .....PetitionerversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Datar and Mr. Tarun Gulati, Senior Advocates with Mr. Kishore Kunal, Ms. Ankita Prakash and Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Indruj Singh Rai SSC, Mr.Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh JSCs and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Burman, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTSigned By:PRADEEP WP(C) No.15970/2023 & Connected Page 1 of 108V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.S.No...
Santosh Barar vs Satpal & Ors (United India Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 30th March 2026 + MAC.APP. 77/2020 SANTOSH BARAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, AdvocatesversusSATPAL & ORS (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sankar N. Sinha, Advocate for R-3/United Insurance Co. Ltd.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed challenging the MACT award dated 20 thMay 2019, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi (MACT/Tribunal) in MACT No. 403/2018, seeking enhancement of compensation. By the said award, a compensation of Rs.14,46,599.48/- was awarded; however, 20% was deducted on account of contributory negligence, on the basis that the injured claimant was under the influence of alcohol.2. The accident occurred on 12th September 2017, when the appellant, a 32-year-old, sustained grievous injuries after his motorcycle was hit fromMAC.APP. 77/2020...
Akshay Lakra vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2858/2025 AKSHAY LAKRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr. Syed Mohd. Shoe, Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Ms. Punya Rekha Angara, Ms. Vasundhara N., Mr. Aman Akhtar, Ms. Sana Singh, Ms. Vasundhara Raj Tyagi and Mr. Arjan Singh Mandla, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Mahavir JogiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 30.03.20261. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No. 84/2025dated 24.07.2025, registered at Police Station Barakhamba Road, for commission of offences under Sections 109(1)/140(3)/62/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 307/365/511/34 IPC).2. FIR in question was registered on 24.07.2025. The complainant, asper the allegations appearing in FIR, was shooting a video under Minto Bridge when one white colour Scorpio Car ca...
Friends Publicity Service vs M/S Paramount Mission Ias
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3206/2024 & CM APPL. 48075/2024 FRIENDS PUBLICITY SERVICE .....Petitioner Through: None.versusM/S PARAMOUNT MISSION IAS .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As nobody has appeared on behalf of the parties, let the matter be called again at 02:30 P.M. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 30, 2026/nd/abk At 02:45 P.M.3. At this stage, it is already 02:45 P.M., nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 30, 2026/nd/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:16:15...
Mav Associates Llp vs National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12164/2025 and CM APPL. 49627/2025 MAV ASSOCIATES LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Batra and Ms. Shivani Chawla, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Advocate Standing Counsel and Mr. Ritik Dwivedi Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. In view of the communication dated 15.12.2025 by the respondent- National Highways Authority of India, nothing remains to be adjudicated.2. Petition stands dismissed as has been rendered infractious. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 30, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 12:17:34...
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation vs the Assistant Controller of Patent ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 72/2024 MITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORPORATION .....Appellant Through: Ms. Vindhya S. Mani and Ms. Ardra Goodwin, Advocates.versusTHE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nikita Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 30.03.20261. This appeal is filed on behalf of the Appellant under Section 117A ofthe Patents Act, 1970 (1970 Act) for setting aside the impugned orderdated 29.05.2024 passed by the Respondent refusing grant of patent in respect of Indian Patent Application No. 10548/DELNP/2015 for invention titled Copper Alloy Wire.2. Indisputably, Appellant filed a PCT Application No.PCT/JP2014/063564 on 22.05.2014 with claims 1-5 originally, claiming benefit of priority from Japan Application No. 2013-110079 filed on 24.05.2013 and 2014-068368 filed on 28.03.2014. On 17.11.2015, Appellant filed the present application wi...
Amit Dubey vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3119/2025 AMIT DUBEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Mishra, Ms. Arya Kumari and Ms. Divya Singh, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Prahlad, PS Special CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 320/2024 ofPolice Station Special Cell for offence under Section 22/29 of NDPS Act. 1.1. This bail application came up for the first hearing on 18.08.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court at a...
U T Electronics Pvt Ltd vs Union of India Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 24th September, 2025 Pronounced on: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on:30th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 1225/2024 JAINA MARKETING AND ASSOCIATES .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITH + W.P.(C) 1291/2024 M/S JAINA MOBILE INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITH + W.P.(C) 1297/2024 INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Mr. Mukesh Jain and Mr. Ajay Goyal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Yamit Jeitley and Mr. Naman Choula, Advs. WITHDigitally Signed W.P.(C...
Unique Identification Authority of India (Uidai) Through Assistant Dir ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1594/2025 UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA (UIDAI) THROUGH ASSISTANT DIRECTOR GENERAL.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Mr. Parikshit Singh Bhati and Mr. Lolita D. Crasta, Advocates.versusSH RAM NATH JAIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, SPC with Ms. Manpreet Kour and Mr. Sachin Singh, Advocates for R-8.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeksfollowing prayers:- A. Direct the Ld. Court of District Judge, Tis Hazari Court to expedite the hearing in the appeal bearing no. PPA No. 06 of 2022, and complete the proceedings in a time bound manner; and B. Pass any other order(s) or direction that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave ...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »