Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravi & Ors. vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2363/2026, CRL.M.A. 9618/2026 RAVI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhuvneshwar Tyagi, Advocate with petitioners in personversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Amit, PS: Bawana R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.680/2024 dated 23.10.2024 registered at PS.: Bawana, Delhi under Sections 84/316/351/3(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.07.2025 [Annexure B] arrived between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.2. Issue notice. Learned APP fo...
Manmohan Kapani vs Virendra Kapani
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2361/2026 MANMOHAN KAPANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shlok Chandra, Mr. Parikshit Singh Bhati, Ms.Lolita Crasta, Mr. Deeparghya Datta, Mr. Teeksh Singhal, Advocates.versusVIRENDRA KAPANI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Udit Awna with Mr. Shivam Wadhwa, Mr. Md. Sahil Raza Khan, Mr. Kunal Srivastava, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9610/2026Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 2361/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9609/2026 (stay) After a brief hearing in the matter, and in view of the law laid- down by the Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.1, Mr. Madhav Khurana, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that he would not press the present petition, reserving his liberty to raise all contentions taken by way of the present petition before the learned tr...
Sanjay Kumar vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1020/2026, CRL.M.As. 9578-80/2026 SANJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Sanduja, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. Lovekesh Aggarwal, Mr. Narender Kumar and Mr. Sarthak Ahuja, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Insp. Arjun Singh, PS: Krishna NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C), the petitioner inter alia seeks a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent nos.1 to 4 to revoke the Look Out Circular (LOC).2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leaveto withdraw the present petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.3. As such, the present petition alongwith the pending applications isdismiss...
Deepak Kumar & Ors. vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2343/2026DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS......Petitioner Through: Mr. Keshav Pawar with Mr. Sahil Sindhwani, Ms. Pooja Khandelwal, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR......Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Brham P.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0955/2018 datedproceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 02.12.2013, as per Hindu traditions, rites and customs. There is no child from such wedlock.3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties startedresiding separately and when a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, it resulted into registration of the abovesaid FIR.4. Charge-sheet has been filed.Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 23...
Anju Tanwar vs Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4237/2026 ANJU TANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitesh Mehra, Advocate along with petitioner in person.versusLAWYERS CHAMBERS ALLOTMENTCOMMITTEE & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.03.20261. From a bare perusal of the Minutes of Meeting of the ChamberAllotment Committee (CAC), it emerges that the Chamber No. 570 was allotted in the name of Mr. Rabinder Mohanty i.e., respondent no.3 and Mr. Rajesh Nayan i.e., respondent no. 2.2. It appears from the record that the petitioner was allowed to use theaforesaid Chamber as an associate of Mr. Rajesh Nayan. The CAC, therefore, rightly concluded that the petitioner was merely a permissive user of the Chamber. The Court further concurs with the view taken by the CAC that in the absence of there being any policy/rule/regulation entitling the petitioner, there is no vested right in favour of the petitioner to use ...
Anjali Sharma and Anr vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1019/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9573/2026ANJALI SHARMA AND ANR.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shashi Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with SI Nagendra Kumar. Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Advocate for R-2/complainant alongwith complainant in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 30.03.20261. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdrawthe present petition as certain material aspects have not been incorporated in the present petition which are very material. He also submits that he may be given liberty to file the petition afresh.2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed.3. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.4. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.MANOJ JAIN, JMARCH 30, 2026/ss/saThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the ord...
Pawan Dubey vs Deepa Tuteja & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ TR.P.(C.) 64/2026 & CM APPL. 19773-74/2026 PAWAN DUBEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Tewatia, Mr. Sahil Gandhi and Ms. Kavya, Advocates.versusDEEPA TUTEJA & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 24 read with Section 151 of the CPCseeks following prayers:- Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is therefore most humble and graciously prayed before this Honble Court that this Honble Court may please to a) Transfer the case titled "Deepa Tuteja Vs. Pawan Dubey", CS (COMM) No. 89/2025, from the Court of Sh. Raghubir Singh, Ld. District Judge (Commercial), West, Tis Hazari Court to the court of Sh. Ashutosh Kumar, Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court-01), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in the interest of justice.Or pass any other order as this Honble Cou...
Shubham Ad Ors. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2381/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9676/2026SHUBHAM AD ORS......Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Kalra, Advocate. Petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with ASI Kushal Pal and SI Vikas Rathi. Ms. Indira Karki, Mr. Anshoo Kumari, Mr. Rishabh Yadav, Advocates forR-2.Respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 633/2022 datedproceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 11.12.2020, as per Hindu rites and customs. No child is born from the abovesaid wedlock.3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties startedSigned By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 2381/2026 1residing separ...
Rampreet Kamat vs State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1230/2026 &CRL.M.A. 9636/2026 RAMPREET KAMAT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Jha, Advocate.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP with SI Sudheer.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 30.03.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 24/2009 dated 30.10.2009,registered at Police Station Ranjeet Nagar, New Delhi for commission of offences under Sections 302/396/411/120-B/34 IPC.2. Admittedly, the petitioner herein had earlier been declared proclaimedoffender and has been arrested on 22.09.2025.3. The bail is being sought also for the reason that his co-accused, who hadfaced the trial, have already been acquitted, way back in the year 2011.4. Fact, however, remains that with respect to the applicant herein, the Chargeshave yet not been framed.5. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for applicant,without prejudice to ...
Rajesh Chhetri & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4056/2026 RAJESH CHHETRI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Gautam and Ms. Niharika Punn, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Samiksha and Ms. Nandini Aggarwal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 30.03.20261. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to cover the services of the Petitioners under the ambit of Old Pension Scheme in terms of the OM dated 03.03.2023 and 09.04.2024(ii) Pass any such orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit inthe light of above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents acceptsnotice and seeks time to file the counter affidavit.4. The counter affidavit be filed by t...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »