Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhaamodar Yaadav vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16565/2024 & CM APPL. 70046/2024 DHAAMODAR YAADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal and Ms. Deeksha Aggarwal, Advs.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.01.20261. The petition is against the order dated 04.03.2024 whereby, aninstrument presented by the petitioner was refused to be registered by the concerned Sub-Registrar and against the order dated 17.09.2024 passed by the concerned Registrar upholding the same. It is claimed that the impugned orders have been passed despite the fact that the said instrument was presented before the Sub-Registrar only after all formalities were completed.2. The order dated 04.03.2024, which was passed by the sub-Registrar,indicates that the subject property was found to be agricultural land and the mandatory No-Objection Certificate from the Land Acquisition Colle...
Meena Kumari vs Taslim Akhtar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 13/2025 MEENA KUMARI .....Appellant Through: None.versusTASLIM AKHTAR & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath and Mr. Amaun Khan, Advocates for respondent No.1/Review PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 27.03.2026 REVIEW PET. 130/2026 (seeking review of order dated 29.01.2026 by respondent no.1)1. The present review petition has been moved by respondent no. 1seeking review of order dated 29.01.2026, vide which, this Court had allowed the concerned appeal and set aside the impugned order dated 21.11.2024 passed by the learned District Judge-2, District North, Rohini Courts, by way of which, in turn, the application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC by respondent no. 1/plaintiff had been allowed.2. Mr. Siddhant Nath, who appears for the review petitioner, seeks recallof the said order by contending that though the parties to the suit had set up their rival claims, the plaintiff had premised his case...
Jaspal Singh vs Commissioner of Customs & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17351/2025 JASPAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakhar Sharma, Mr. Deepak Kumar Pandey, Ms. Riya Verma, Ms. Piya Uppal and Mr. Ayush Malik, Advocates.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vishal Chadha, Sr. Standing Counsel along with Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 29.01.20261. In compliance of the order dated 14th November 2025, learned counsel for the respondents has produced a copy of the order dated 14th January 2026 passed by Commissioner of Customs (Appeals). The saidorder is adverse to the interest of the petitioner.2. The said order sets aside the Order-in-Original dated 10th July 2025, the implementation of which is sought through the present petition.3. In that view above, we are of the opinion that the present petition has been rendered infructuous.4. The petition, accordingly, stands dis...
Branch Metrics Inc vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Interna ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 29.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 17222/2025, CM APPL. 70857/2025 BRANCH METRICS INC .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Mansha Anand, Mr. Sohum Dua, Mr. Abhyudaya Bajpyee, Ms. Manvi and Mr. Ghunain Siddiqui, Advs.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAX 1 1 2 NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Debesh Panda, SSC and Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Ms. Zehra Khan, JSCsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (ORAL)1. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged orderdated 02.05.2025 passed by the office of the Circle Income Tax 1(1)(2) (hereinafter referred to as competent authority) deciding petitioners application under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961) and consequential certificate dated 18.06.2025 whereby the respondent has required its counterpart...
Union of India & Ors. vs Shri a. K. Jha
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19373/2025 & CM APPL. 80814/2025, CM APPL. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ishkaran Singh Bhandari, CGSC with Mr. Piyush Yadav, Adv.versusSHRI A. K. JHA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.01.20261. Through the present writ petition, the Petitioners assailcorrectness of the order dated 17.04.2025, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in O.A. No.2075/2022. The learned CAT has proceeded to quash the suspension order of the Respondent on the ground that he was never issued any Charge Memo for a period of more than four years till the impugned order was passed.2. The Respondent has already retired from service on 31.01.2021. The suspension order was issued only three days before the Respondent was to demit office on attaining the age of superannuation.3. Even till today, the Departm...
Dinanath Mittal vs Pradeep and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 362/2025 & CM APPL. 71979/2025 DINANATH MITTAL .....Petitioner Through:versusPRADEEP AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. alongwith R- 3 & R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent ControlAct, 1958 seeks the following prayers:- a) Call for the record of eviction petition bearing no. E- 50712022 titled as 'Sh. Pradeep & Others Versus Sh. DinaNath Mittal' from the court of Ld. A.R.C.-01, (Central District), TisHazari Courts, Delhi; b) To set aside the impugned order dated 14.05.2025 passed by the Court of Sh. Rupinder Singh Dhiman, A.R.C.-01, (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in the aforesaid matter and dismiss the eviction petition; c) To award the cost of the petition throughout, in favour of the petitioner; d) Any other or further order(s) which...
Tejas Mor Through His Mother vs Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19418/2025 TEJAS MOR THROUGH HIS MOTHER .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed, is granted.3. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 29, 2026/P/AMGThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 12:19:59...
Vicky Middha vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4970/2025 VICKY MIDDHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Ms. Neha Kumari, Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocates.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State. Mr. Tejpartap Singh, Mr. Asfak Ansari, Advocates for complainants. Ms. Supriya, Mr. Sumit, Advocates for complainant.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. By way of this application, the applicant seeks interim bail inconnection with FIR No. 176/2025 dated 12.05.2025, registered at Police Station Saket, Economic Offences Wing [EoW], Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318, and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 10/24 of the Emigration Act, 1983.2. The FIR was registered on the complaint of one Mohit Kumar Pandey against a company by the name of M/s Asia to World Consultants Pvt. Ltd., of which the applicant is a director. According to the BA...
Ilyas Malik vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17866/2025 with CM APPL. 73831/2025 ILYAS MALIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raksham Ahmed and Mr. Parvez Siddiqui, Advocates (through VC).versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Akanksha Gupta, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Chand Chopra, Mr. Punishk Handa and Mr. Shivam Bansal, Advocates for R-2/STF. Ms. S.S. Surana, CGSC for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.01.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction torespondents no.1 to 3 to take action against the unauthorised and illegal construction in the property bearing no.37, Radha Krishna Vihar, Jasola, New Delhi-110025.2. A further direction is sought to demolish the illegal construction raised by the respondents no.4 and 5.3. Counsel on behalf of the respondent no.2/Special Task Force appearson advance notice and has handed over the minutes of the meeting of the Special Task Force dated 20th January, 2...
Sanjay Nautiyal & Anr. vs Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 9216/2025 SANJAY NAUTIYAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Mr. Varun Chopra & Mr. Himanshu, Advocates alongwith P-1 & P-2 in Person.versusGOVT OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with SI Anup Rana, PS Hari Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 364/2021 dated 10.07.2021, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar, West District, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/420/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. The petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married on13.07.2012 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One female child has been born...