Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshman Dutt Khanna vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3465/2014 LAKSHMAN DUTT KHANNA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Kartickay Mathur, Adv.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms Kritika Gupta, Adv. Ms. Priya Puri and Mr. Sachin Dubey Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- 1)Issue a writ of certiorari thereby quashing or setting aside the order dated 28.01.2014 passed by the respondent as illegal thereby holding the petitioner entitle to allotment of flat under the 1979 scheme. 2)Issue a Writ of Mandamus thereby directing the respondent to allot the flat number 53, First Floor Sector 23, Pocket 6 Rohini, Delhi 110085 or in alternate a similar flat be allotted to the petitioner on same terms and conditions as under the scheme of 1979. .2. The case of the petitioner is that in 1979 the respondent i.e., DelhiDevelopment Authority ...
V K Uppal vs Merun Kahtun & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 154/2016, CM APPL. 12811/2016, CM APPL. 12812/2016, CM APPL. 12813/2016 and CM APPL. 12814/2016 V K UPPAL .....Appellant Through: NoneversusMERUN KAHTUN & ORS .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 29.01.20261. None for the appellant.2. This Court vide order dated 03.07.2025 noted the submission oflearned counsel for the appellant that he had returned the file to the appellant, on which, the court notice was directed to be issued to the appellant. As per the office noting, however, the Court notice remained unserved as the appellant is stated to have expired and the death certificate is also attached in this regard. There is no application for substitution.3. In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal stands abated and is disposed of accordingly alongwith the pending applications. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JANUARY 29, 2026 naThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can ...
State of Nct of Delhi vs Bhagat & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 13th November, 2025 Pronounced on: 29th January, 2026 + CRL.A.1595/2025 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Mohan Lal.versus1. BHAGAT S/o Sh. Narender Dev R/o Village Kaniyan, P.S. Kandhia, District Muzaffar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. ....Respondent No.12. ASHWANI KUMAR @ KAKA S/o Darshan Kumar, R/o Flat No. 923, PKT-7, Sector-A-6, Narela, Delhi. ....Respondent No.23. RAMBIRS/o Sh. Harji Ram, R/o E-184, Yadav Nagar, P.S. S.P. Badli, Delhi. ....Respondent No.3 Through: Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa, Mr. Jatin Sharma, Mr. Hemant Singh and Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.Signature Not Verified CRL.A.1595/2025 Page 1 of 141. Criminal Appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of CriminalProcedure, 193 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) has been filed against the Judgment dated 09.11.2020, whereby the l...
Gaurav Anand vs State G.N.C.T of Delhi Through S.H.O. P.S. Shahdara
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5064/2025 GAURAV ANAND ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Lakshay Teotia, Adv.versusSTATE G.N.C.T OF DELHI THROUGH S.H.O. P.S. SHAHDARA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Rakesh Kumar, PS ShahdaraCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2304/2026-For withdrawal of bail application1. By virtue of the present application, the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the captioned bail application 5064/2025.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the present application is allowed.3. The application is disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 5064/20254. In view of the order passed in CRL.M.A. 2304/2026, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.5. The date already fixed, i.e. 26.02.2026, is cancelled. SAURABH BANERJEE, J JANUARY 29, 2026/rrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning ...
Limbdi Homoepathic Medical College and Hospital vs Union of India and ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18291/2025 & CM APPL. 75823/2025 LIMBDI HOMOEPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv. and Mr. Ankit Sharma, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Dr. Monika Arora CGSE with Mr Subhrodeep Saha Ms Anamika Thakur Mr. Prabhat Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Verma AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.01.20261. Mr. Arputham, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J JANUARY 29, 2026 / (MS)This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:48:54...
Seema Goel vs the Registrar of Trade Marks
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 81/2025 SEEMA GOEL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Roop Singh, Advocate.versusTHE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 29.01.20261. This appeal is filed on behalf of the Appellant under Section 91 of theTrade Marks Act, 1999 (1999 Act) laying a challenge to impugned orderdated 12.08.2025 passed by the learned Registrar of Trade Marks in Trademark Application No. 4550705 filed by the Appellant, whereby Respondent has refused registration of the trademark citing two trademarks stated to be deceptively similar to the applied trademark.2. Case of the Appellant is that she adopted the trademark andstarted using the trademark from 19.06.2019. On 30.06.2020, Appellant filed an application for registration of the said trademark in Form TM-A bearing Application No. 4550705 for goods and services in Class 3...
Cogoport Private Limited vs Mr Anuj Bajaj and Others
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 540/2024, I.A. 48306/2024, I.A. 48307/2024, I.A. 48309/2024, I.A. 17771/2025 & I.A. 26705/2025 COGOPORT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Biswas, Adv.versusMR ANUJ BAJAJ AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vedant Choudhary, Adv. for R- 1&2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter has been settled and the settlement terms and conditions are dated 11.12.2025.2. In view of the above developments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications stands dismissed. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 1...
Rxxx vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 3883/2025 RXXX .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Shubham Goyal, Ms. Anshu Chothwani and Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 29.01.2026 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. The petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JANUARY 29, 2026/ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 13:26:47...
Arun & Ors. vs State Nct Govt of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 28/2026 ARUN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Ganpat Ram, Mr. Gorang Goyal, Mr. Sonam Tomar, Advocates alongwith P-1 to 7 in Person.versusSTATE NCT GOVT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Ankit Kumar Singh & Mr. Priyansh Raj Singh, Advocates. SI Mahavir, PS DBG Road. Mr. Sachin Pal, Advocate alongwith R-2 in Person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The petitioners have preferred the present petition seekingquashing of FIR No. 472/2025 registered at Police Station D.B.G. Road, Central District, Delhi, on 14.12.2025 under Sections alongwith all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of settlement.2. Respondent No. 2 lodged a complaint against the petitioners alleging that on 12.12.2025 at about 8:15 PM, he was assaulted while attempting to intervene and free his neighbour, Rahul, ...
Mahesh Kumar vs Satish Duggal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 332/2012 MAHESH KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given.versusSATISH DUGGAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Sabhaiwal, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal under Section 96 of the CPC, seeks the followingprayers:- It is, therefore, prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to set- aside the judgment and decree dated 03.03.2012 passed by the Court of Sh. Ajay Kumar Kuhar, ADJ-1 (Central), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi in suit no. 1124/08 and may be pleased to allow this appeal and decreed the suit in question for specific performance with cost throughout.Such other or further order as it may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may please be passed in favour of the appellant.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has handed upin Court today settlement agreement dated 12.01.2026 which records a...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »