Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Omaxe New Chandigarh Developers Private Limited vs Atharva Hotel Super ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 20th January, 2026 Pronounced on: 29th January, 2026 + ARB.P. 1678/2025 OMAXE NEW CHANDIGARH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karanjot Singh Mainee, Mr. Sahil Chopra, Ms. Manya Kaushik, Advocates (M:9717413994)versusATHARVA HOTEL SUPERFLUITIES INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vishal Bhatnagar and Mr. Veer Pratap Singh, Advocates (M:9313674756)CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAJUDGMENTMINI PUSHKARNA, J.1. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner underSection 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator in terms of the arbitration clause, i.e., Clause 15 (b) of the Lease Deed dated 15 th November, 2022 (Lease Deed), which provides for adjudication of disputes between the parties by arbitration.2. Facts of the case, as canvassed in the petition, are as follows: 2.1 The petitioner is a private limite...
Pravin Sharma vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16032/2025 PRAVIN SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Akanksha Chaudhary, Advocate along with petitioner in person.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, ASC for MCD with Mr. Subhit Kumar, AE-MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.01.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent/MCD to carry out the inspection of the construction made on Plot No.29 in pocket E-3 of Sector 11, Rohini.2. While issuing notice, the Predecessor Bench was of the view that theconcerned SHO as well as the owner/occupier of the property should also be impleaded in the writ petition as respondents. Accordingly, they were impleaded as the respondents no.2 and 3 respectively and notice was issued to them.3. Status report has been handed over in Court on behalf of therespondent/MCD and the same is taken on record. In the status report it is stated as follows: i....
Happy @ Sanjeev Rana vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4573/2025 HAPPY @ SANJEEV RANA .....Applicant Through: Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, Adv. (through VC)VersusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State Mr. Ranjan Bhatia, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.01.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant/ accused (applicant) seeks grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.113/2025 dated 09.05.2025, registered at PS.: Crime Branch, Delhi under Section(s) 20/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).2. As per facts, on 09.05.2025, upon intimation, the concerned ASIapprehended two persons namely, Deepak and Sunil, alongwith the Eicher Container bearing no.HR69B7295 from Mata Kali Road, Sector-32, Rohini, Delhi. After complying all the necessary provisions of the NDPS Act, a total of 365...
Saket Koul vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7420/2025 SAKET KOUL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahil Vij, Advocate alongwith petitionerversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for the State alongwith SI Suraj, P.S.- Hauz Khas R-2 in person (VC)CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 515/2023 dated 20.12.2023, registered at Police Station Hauz Khas, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 506, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], together with all proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled.2. The impugned FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No.2 against the petitioner and one Mr. Praveen...
Mahesh Kumar & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7495/2025 & CRL.M.A. 31374/2025 MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Ms. Shreya Mathur & Ms. Muskan Dwivedi, Advocates for P-1 to 5.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with SI Piyush, PS Roop Nagar. Mr. Himanshu Choudhary, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in Person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 156/2019 dated 08.10.2019, registered at Police Station Roop Nagar, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC] and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional PublicProsecutor, accepts notice on behalf of...
Rita Vipin Through Ar Rahul Juneja vs M/S Omaxe Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1827/2025 RITA VIPIN THROUGH AR RAHUL JUNEJA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sujata Kashyap & Ms. Ishika Rawat, Advs.versusM/S OMAXE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Niharika Shukla, Adv. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 29.01.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. The petitioner was allotted a commercial unit located at Sector Beta-II, Greater Noida. The respondent entered into a lease deed with petitioner and also executed an agreement for sale of the property in question. A dispute arose between the parties and notice under Section 21 of the Act was issued by the petitioner on 16.06.2025. Thereafter this petition is filed. The parties were referred to mediation but yielded no result.3. Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions has no serious objection for referring ...
Deepak Jain vs Shuchi Jain
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3849/2024 & CM APPL. 67297-98/2024 DEEPAK JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusSHUCHI JAIN .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks following prayers:-a) summon the records of the case bearing GP. No. 70 of 2022 titled Deepak Jain vs. Shuchi Jain from the Court of Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. Judge, Family Court- 01, Shahadara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi; andb) allow the petition of the petitioner and set aside the order dt. 07- 06- 2024 passed by the Court of Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. Judge, Family Court- 01, Shahadara, Karkardooma Courts whereby the Ld. Judge has dismissed the application of the petitioner to celebrate the Father's Day on 18-06-2024, grandparents' day on 10-09-2024, Arham's Birthday on ...
Amit Aggarwal vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI%Pronounced on: 29.01.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 4124/2025 AMIT AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjali Jha Manish, Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Madhuri Malegaonkar, Ms. Kratika Shaiyam, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel with Mr. Kartik Sabharwal, Mr. Kanishk Maurya, Mr. Pranjal Tripathi, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAJUDGMENTRAVINDER DUDEJA, J.1. This is an application for grant of regular bail filed on behalf of applicant in case FIR No. 45/2022 under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act [PMLA], registered at Police Station EOW. BAIL APPLN. 4124/2025 Page 1 of 17 Brief Facts of the case:2. The case arises from FIR No. 45/2022 dated 16.03.2022registered by the Economic Offences Wing, Delhi, based on a complaint by Chartered Accountant Mr. Vikash Mohpal that forged Form 15CB certificates bea...
Daya Kishan Goel vs Shri Ramesh Chander Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~5 & 6* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 29.01.2026 + FAO(OS) 127/2025 DAYA KISHAN GOEL ....Appellant SHRI RAMESH CHANDER GOEL .....Respondent + FAO(OS) 128/2025 CHIRAG GOEL .....Appellant RAMESH CHANDER GOEL .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARJUDGMENT1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The present appeals have been filed assailing the Order dated28.08.2025 passed in I.A. No. 16751/2025 in CS (OS) 1239/2008 and I.A. No. 16971/2025 in CS (OS) 1240/2008, inter alia, the application of the appellant filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC has been dismissed.3. It is pertinent to note that the appellant had earlier also filed Signed By:PRATIBHA FAO(OS) 127/2025 & FAO(OS) 128/2025 Page 1 of 4applications under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, which were dismissed by the Single Judge of this Court. The appeals filed by the appellant challenging the said order were also dismissed by the ...
Hansraj & Anr. vs Height Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 9500/2024 & CRL.M.A. 36495/2024, CRL.M.A. 37844/2024, CRL.M.A. 37845/2024 HANSRAJ & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: NoneversusHEIGHT BUILDCON PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.01.20261. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners, when the matter was taken up for hearing.2. Perusal of order sheets reveal that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the last three dates of hearing i.e. on 12.03.2025, 09.07.2025 and 07.08.2025.3. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter any further.4. Accordingly, the present petition alongwith pending applications i.e. CRL.M.A. 36495/2024, CRL.M.A. 37844/2024, CRL.M.A. 37845/2024 stands dismissed for non-prosecution.5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/ns/ GJThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the or...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »