Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd Affan vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 5053/2025 & CRL.M.A. 38872/2026 MOHD AFFAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd Azhar, Advocate (through videoconferencing)versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with IO/HC Ravi and SI Sunit, PS Jagat Puri CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case e-FIR No.2. Broadly speaking, the FIR was registered on e-FIR portal, wherebythe complainant de facto alleged that on 23.10.2025, his mobile phone was snatched by two persons who came on a two-wheeler scooter and fled. Further, according to prosecution, the present accused/applicant and co- accused Mohd. Saim were arrested in another case and mobile phone of the complainant de facto was recovered from their possession.BAIL APPLN. 5053/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb483...
Ravi Kumar vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 03.12.2025Judgment pronounced on: 29.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.01.2026+ CRL.A. 1384/2010 RAVI KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Singh and Mr. Ramashish Yadav, Advocates.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State with SI Pinky.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. By way of the present appeal, the appellant seeks setting asideof the judgment of conviction dated 09.11.2010 and order on sentence dated 10.11.2010, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02, South, Saket Courts, Delhi [hereafter Trial Court] in case FIR bearing no. 205/2008, registered at Police Station Vasant Kunj, Delhi, for offence punishable under Sections 366/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter IPC].FACTUAL BACKGROUND2. The brief facts of the case are that the present FIR came to beCRL.A. 1384/2010 Page 1 of 12 registered on 25.04.20...
Rakesh Kumar vs State Govt of Nct & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 44/2026 RAKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Md. Hashim, Mr. Harish Yadav, Advs.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. and SI Arun Kumar, PS Paharganj.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 29.01.2026 W.P.(CRL) 44/20261. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for issuance of a direction in the nature of a Writ of Habeas Corpus for tracing, production and safe recovery of the minor son of the petitioner.2. The learned Standing Counsel for the State has produced before us a Status Report dated 21.01.2026 detailing the efforts that have been made by the respondents to ascertain the whereabouts of the missing boy.3. The learned counsel for...
Shyam Rastogi Trading as Shyam Hosiery Industries and Anr & Anr. vs Hu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ Judgment reserved on: 20.01.2026Judgment delivered on: 29.01.2026CM(M)-IPD 4/2026, CM 10/2026, CM 12/2026 SHYAM RASTOGI TRADING AS SHYAM HOSIERY INDUSTRIES AND ANR .....PetitionersversusHUGO BOSS TRADE MARK MANAGEMENT GMBH AND CO KG AND ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Chandra Prakash, Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Ms. Aindri Sahah and Mr. Maulik Khurana, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal and Mr. Rishi Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAJUDGMENTTUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J.CM 11/2026 (condonation of delay)1. By way of the present application, the petitioners seek condonation of delay of 36 days in filing the present petition.2. For the reasons stated in the present application, the application is allowed and the delay of 36 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.3. The application st...
Union of India & Ors. vs 692688 Ex Hfl Ram Kumar Retd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 29.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 1094/2026 & CM APPL. 5335/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Mishra, CGSC Mr. Himanshu Singh, Mr. Gaurav Mishra and Mr. Navneet Dubey, Advs.versus692688 EX HFL RAM KUMAR RETD .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA J. (ORAL)1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia against the order dated 24.09.2024 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A.] No. 3280/2023 titled as Ex HFL Ram Kumar v. Union of India & Ors., wherein the respondent has been granted the benefit of the disability element of pension for Primary Hypertension assessed at 30%, rounded off to 50% for life, from the date of his retirement from the service i.e., 31.03.2023.2. The facts giving rise to t...
Renuka Wahi vs Maharaj I S Wahi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~R 12* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 289/2018 RENUKA WAHI .....Appellant Through: None.versusMAHARAJ I S WAHI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 29.01.20261. The present appeal is one of the oldest matters listed for hearing in the category of Regular Matters.2. The matter was called out twice in the revised call, however, none appeared on behalf of the parties.3. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.4. Interim order(s), if any, stands discharged. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J JANUARY 29, 2026/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:29:51...
Devender Goel Alias Devender Kumar Goel vs M/S Ram Chand Baboo Mal and ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~132 to 134* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 316/2026, CRL.M.A. 3035/2026 & CRL.M.A. + W.P.(CRL) 317/2026, CRL.M.A. 3038/2026 & CRL.M.A. + W.P.(CRL) 318/2026, CRL.M.A. 3041/2026 & CRL.M.A. & ORS. .....Respondent Appearance: Mr. Amardeep Singh and Mr Aditya Singh, Advocates for petitioner.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The present three petitions arise out of proceedings instituted underW.P.(CRL) 316/2026 and connected matters Page 1 of 2 Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the petitioner against the respondents, being Ct. Case No. 543434/2016, Ct. Case No. JMFC (NI Act)-07, Tis Hazari Courts, Central District, Delhi [learned Magistrate]. The petitioner contends that, although the complaints were filed in 2016, the matters continue to remain pending at the stage of framing of notice. It is the petitioners contention that the delay in the proceedings is attributable to the respondents.2. In these c...
Udaipur Beverages Limited vs M/S Leap India Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 180/2026 UDAIPUR BEVERAGES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Narender Singh Yadav, Mr. Mayank Kumar Singh, Mr.Mudit Bansal, Mr. Girraj Singh Yadav, AdvsversusM/S LEAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 29.01.2026 I.A. 2097/2026 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB.P. 180/2026, I.A. 2098/20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties under the Agreement for hire of Equipment and Supply of Services dated 21.03.2022.2. It is the case of the Petitioner that under the Agreement, theRespondent was engaged to provide equipment, including primary pallets, to the Petitioner on a hire basis. It is stated that since the Respondent has failed to perform its ob...
Vijay Gupta vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 13.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 29.01.2026+ CRL.M.C. 242/2026 VIJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Singh, Mr. Chetan, Mr. Naman Jain and Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advs.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Amisha Dahiya, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTIndex to the JudgmentFACTUAL BACKGROUND & SUBMISSIONS BEFORE THE COURT .................................................................................................... 2 ANALYSIS & FINDINGS ...................................................................... 5(i) Failure to Consider The Bail Application on Merits and Non- Application of Judicial Mind .................................................................... 6(ii) Right to Hearing and Impermissibility of Dismissal on Grounds of Application being Too Voluminous or ...
Sh. Vikram Gupta and Ors vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 725/2026 SH. VIKRAM GUPTA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counsel (appearance not given).versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State along with SI Sonal Raj. R-2 with her counsel (appearance not given).CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2906/2026 (delay)1. By way of the present application, the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 39 days in re-filing the present petition.2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 39 days in re-filing the present petition is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 725/20264. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek quashing ofFIR bearing no. 754/2023, registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498-A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »