Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~44 & 16* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 29th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 508/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2050/2026 ADARSH YADAV & ORS. Through: Mr. R.K. Solanki, Mr. Subhash Kr. Anand and Ms. Vanita, Advocates STATE (GOVT OF NCT) DELHI & ANR. + CRL.M.C. 356/2026 ANIL & ORS. Through: Mr. Varun Singh, Mr. Rajeev Kumar and Ms. Khyati Prajapati, Advocates. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Mr. R.K. Solanki, Mr. Subhash Kr. Anand and Ms. Vanita, Advocates for R-2 & 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Both the abovesaid matters are connected cross-cases and in both the matters, the concerned petitioners have filed petitions seeking quashing of respective FIRs. Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 508/2026 & CRL.M.C. 356/2026 12. The details of both the cases are as under:-[In CRL.M.C.508/2026] FIR No. 418/2021 Number of accused 03 Offences 308/201/323 IPC r/w 34 IPC Number of injured/ victim(s) 01 Stage of trial Prosecution Evide...
Rohan Khinchi vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 192/2026 ROHAN KHINCHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar and Mr. Ankit Kumar Vats, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP. SI Bhupender Singh, PS: Karol Bagh.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. By way of this application, the applicant seeks anticipatory bail inconnection with FIR No. 1153/2025 dated 25.09.2025, registered at Police Station Karol Bagh under Sections 318(4), 316(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.2. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, hashanded over a status report in Court, a copy of which was also made available to Mr. Ankit Kumar Vats, learned counsel for the applicant. The hearing was accordingly passed over to enable Mr. Vats to peruse the status report. The status report is hereby taken on record.3. The FIR was registered on the complaint of one Mr. Gaurav PratapSingh. Although the applicant ...
Indian Speech Language and Hearing Association vs Union of India & Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19171/2025 and CM APPL. 6002/2026 INDIAN SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING ASSOCIATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Sagar, Mr. Bibin John, Ms.Glorina George, Mr Stanislas, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, CGSC with Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu, and Mr. Tribhuvan, Advs for R-1. Ms. Counsel for R-2, (appearance not given) Mr. Shivender singh and M L Meena for R-5. Mr. Chandrashekhar Chakalabbi and Mr. Jatin Kumar, Advocates for R-8. Mr M. L. Meena, Mr Shivendra Singh, Ms Prakriti Rastogi, Ms Aryama Singh Rajput Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.01.20261. The petitioner claims to be an Indian Speech-language & HearingAssociation, which is a professional body of qualified rehabilitation professionals engaged in promoting standards in education, training and practice in the field of speech and hearing. The Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 199...
Vinod Kumar Through Parokar vs Sufiana Developers Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~89 to 92* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 11/2025 & CRL.M.A. 1554/2025 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 12/2025 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 13/2025 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 14/2025 VINOD KUMAR THROUGH PAROKAR .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSUFIANA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.01.20261. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, when the matter was taken up for hearing.2. On the last date of hearing also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any further.4. Accordingly, the present petitions alongwith pending application i.e., CRL.M.A. 1554/2025 stands dismissed for non-prosecution.5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/ns/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the Q...
Devender Goel Alias Devender Kumar Goel vs M/S Ram Chand Baboo Mal and ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~132 to 134* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 316/2026, CRL.M.A. 3035/2026 & CRL.M.A. + W.P.(CRL) 317/2026, CRL.M.A. 3038/2026 & CRL.M.A. + W.P.(CRL) 318/2026, CRL.M.A. 3041/2026 & CRL.M.A. & ORS. .....Respondent Appearance: Mr. Amardeep Singh and Mr Aditya Singh, Advocates for petitioner.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The present three petitions arise out of proceedings instituted underW.P.(CRL) 316/2026 and connected matters Page 1 of 2 Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the petitioner against the respondents, being Ct. Case No. 543434/2016, Ct. Case No. JMFC (NI Act)-07, Tis Hazari Courts, Central District, Delhi [learned Magistrate]. The petitioner contends that, although the complaints were filed in 2016, the matters continue to remain pending at the stage of framing of notice. It is the petitioners contention that the delay in the proceedings is attributable to the respondents.2. In these c...
Sanjay Mishra & Anr. vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 728/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2909/2026-Stay, CRL.M.A. SANJAY MISHRA & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Shyam Bhandari, Mr. G. Priyadarshini, Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Mr. Satyam Pathak and Ms. Anshita Sharma, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with SI Deependra, PS: Punjabi Bagh Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jain, Advocates Mr. Hariom, Ms. Ashu Gupta, Ms. Preeti, Advocates for ComplainantCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.451/2025 dated 14.07.2025 registered at P.S: Punjabi Bagh, Delhi under Section(s) 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. While this Court was hearing learned counse...
Devender Goel Alias Devender Kumar Goel vs M/S Ram Chand Baboo Mal and ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~132 to 134* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 316/2026, CRL.M.A. 3035/2026 & CRL.M.A. + W.P.(CRL) 317/2026, CRL.M.A. 3038/2026 & CRL.M.A. + W.P.(CRL) 318/2026, CRL.M.A. 3041/2026 & CRL.M.A. & ORS. .....Respondent Appearance: Mr. Amardeep Singh and Mr Aditya Singh, Advocates for petitioner.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The present three petitions arise out of proceedings instituted underW.P.(CRL) 316/2026 and connected matters Page 1 of 2 Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the petitioner against the respondents, being Ct. Case No. 543434/2016, Ct. Case No. JMFC (NI Act)-07, Tis Hazari Courts, Central District, Delhi [learned Magistrate]. The petitioner contends that, although the complaints were filed in 2016, the matters continue to remain pending at the stage of framing of notice. It is the petitioners contention that the delay in the proceedings is attributable to the respondents.2. In these c...
Mayank Tayal & Anr. vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 9219/2025 & CRL.M.A. 38496/2025 MAYANK TAYAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prince Kumar and Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocates alongwith petitionersversusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State alongwith Ms. Pragati Gupta, Advocate with SI Chetram, PS Binda Pur Mr. Subodh Gupta, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 236/2021 dated 02.04.2021, registered at Police Station Binda Pur, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC] and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional PublicProsecutor, accepts notice...
Union of India and Ors vs Ex Sub Bijendra Singh Sirohi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 29.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 19340/2025, CM APPL. 80717/2025 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Aishwarya Chhabra, SPC and Major Anish Muralidhar, ArmyversusEX SUB BIJENDRA SINGH SIROHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. V. S. Kadian, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 80718/2025 (for exemption)1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 19340/2025, CM APPL. 80717/20253. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated08.02.2024 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) in Original Application No. 575/2016 (OA for short) wherein the Tribunal has allowed the OA filed by the respondent herein by stating in paragraphs 10 and 11 as under:- 10. In view of the aforesaid judicial pronouncements and the parameters referred to above, the appli...
Bakul Samanta vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5016/2025 BAKUL SAMANTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Nandwani, Mr. Shubham Kaushik and Mr. Sumit Kumar Chauhan, Advocates.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State with SI Bhupender Singh, P.S. Karol Bagh. Mr. Abhinav Deshwal, Mr. Digant Mishra, Ms. Kashmira Lambat, Mr. Anshul Rajora, Ms. Sharvi Sharma and Ms. Zeinab Siddiqui, Advocates for R-2/complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 29.01.20261. Applicant herein seeks regular bail in a case arising out of FIR No.2. The accused has already been charged for commission of offences under Section 316(2), and in alternate under Section 317(2) BNS.3. The charges were framed on 04.10.2025, and accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.4. The complainant i.e. Tapan Kumar Jana has already been examined-in-chief.5. The applicant was arrested on 27.05.2025 and is in custody since then. He has rep...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »