Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Paramount Coaching Centre Pvt. Ltd. vs M/S. Dixit Reprographic
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 988/2021 M/S PARAMOUNT COACHING CENTRE PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: None.versusM/S. DIXIT REPROGRAPHIC .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. None has appeared on behalf of either of the parties.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties, the matter is passed over and be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/MR/ABK At 2:35 PM4. At this stage, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite a pass over.5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/MR/ABKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 13:49:27...
Atul Jain vs Lovekush Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13465/2022, CM APPL. 40953/2022 ATUL JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kiran, Advocate with petitioner through VC.versusLOVEKUSH SINGH .....Respondent Through: Ms. Reetu Jain and Mr. Sreedhar Nair, Advocates with respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 29.01.20261. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states, uponinstructions from the petitioner, who has joined the proceedings through VC, that the parties have been able to arrive at an amicable settlement vide settlement agreement dated 20.08.2025 before Samadhan Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. It is stated that in terms of the settlement agreement, the petitioner has agreed to pay a lumpsum amount of Rs.1,35,000/- as full and final settlement of all the claims of the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over a demand draft dated 27.01.2026 of Rs.1,35,000/-, a photocopy of which has ...
Renu Mathur & Ors vs Ramesh Chander Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 7th January, 2026Judgment pronounced on: 29th January, 2026+ RFA 1003/2019, CM APPL. 50426/2019, CM APPL. 54558/2019 & CM APPL. 27979/2025 RENU MATHUR & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Mr. Nitin Kumar & Ms. Shruti Kapur, Advocates.versusRAMESH CHANDER GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta and Ms. Mahima Chanchalani, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALJUDGMENTAMIT BANSAL, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the CivilProcedure Code, 1908 (CPC) read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the CPC impugning the judgment and decree dated 3rd September, 2019 passed by the Additional District Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CS No.2. By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court has passed a decree of Rs. 50 lakhs in favour of the plaintiff along with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Signed By:VIVEK RFA 1003/2019 Page 1 of 113. The plaintif...
Amit Gupta vs Union Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12389/2023 & CM APPL. 48881/2023 AMIT GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Ms Ayushi Arya, Mr. Nitin K Gupta, Advs.versusUNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. OP Gaggar and Mr. Sachindra Karn, Advocates for R1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 29.01.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- a) Setting aside/Quashing the Impugned orders dt. 28.02.2023 (not served to the Petitioner) and 22.05.2023 passed by the Identification Committee and Review Committee of the Respondent No. 1 Bank in violation of Clause 3(b) of the RBI Master circular 2015 and principles of natural justice and fundamental rights guaranteed to the Petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; and b) direct Respondents to adhere to the RBI Master circular 2015 and principles of natural justice while deciding the declaration of wi...
M/S Sharma Videos vs Anil Banka & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1301/2023 M/S SHARMA VIDEOS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alex Noel Dass, Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Mr. Vibhor Kumar Sharma, Advocates.versusANIL BANKA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel for GNCTD along with Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Special Counsel along with Mr. Ashwin Kataria, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the presentpetition in the light of the order dated 14.01.2026 passed in CM APPL.65265/2023 in W.P (C) 14622/2022, whereby, the order dated 24.03.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 14622/2022 (of which contempt is alleged) has been recalled.2. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SACHIN DATTA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown...
Rajender@Bunty vs Bharti Axa Gen Insurance Company Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 13th January 2026Pronounced on : 29th January 2026Uploaded on : 30th January 2026 + MAC.APP. 517/2018 & CM APPL. 22859/2018 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD.....Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv.versusRAJENDER @ BUNTY .....Respondent Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advs. + MAC.APP. 799/2019 RAJENDER @ BUNTY .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advs.versusBHARTI AXA GEN INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. These appeals have been filed by insurance company and the claimant respectively. The Insurance company has filed the appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (MV Act), seeking to set aside theMAC.APP. 517/2018 & MAC.APP. 799/2019 Page 1/13 impugned judgment and award dated 20th February 2018 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims...
Rohit Singh vs Bar Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8354/2025 and CM APPL. 36210/2025, CM APPL. 6012/2026 ROHIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Adv.versusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.01.20261. The petitioner has filed an application bearing CM APPL. 6012/2026 seeking withdrawal of the petition.2. In view thereof, the petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 29, 2026 aks/mjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 15:01:22...
Delhi Petrol Dealers Association & Anr. vs Government of Nct of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8855/2025 with CM APPL. 37849/2025 DELHI PETROL DEALERS ASSOCIATION & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Counsel (appearance not given)versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocate for R-1. Dr. Abhishek Atrey & Mr. Navneet Gupta, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.01.20261. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view ofthe fact that the order passed by the Supreme Court on 12th August, 2025 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13029/1985, directing that no coercive action shall be taken against the end-of-life vehicles, is still continuing; he has instructions to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach this Court in the event of change of circumstances.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.3. Pending application also stands disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J JANUARY 29, 2026 atThi...
M/S. Wyan Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Ishwari Devi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 209/2024, CM APPL. 37758/2024, CM APPL. 35323/2025 and CM APPL. 55523/2025 M/S. WYAN INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr.Rishabh Gupta, Mr.Devansh Dua, Mr.Prabhu Malik and Mr.Kunal S., AdvocatesversusISHWARI DEVI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.R.K. Nain and Mr.Chadan Prajapati, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 29.01.2026 1. The appellant/M/s. Wyan Industries Pvt. Ltd. is aggrieved by the orders dated 19.03.2024 and 23.04.2024 passed by the learned Commissioner under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923.2. Vide the aforesaid order dated 19.03.2024, the appellant was foundliable to pay death compensation of Rs. 9,62,475/-, along with interest @ 12% p.a. w.e.f. 07.06.2022, i.e., the date of death, till its realization, and Rs. 5,000/- towards funeral expenses. Vide the subsequent order dated 23.04.2024, a Show Cause Notice under Section 4(a)(3)(b) of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 wa...
Navendu Agarwal vs State & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8892/2025 NAVENDU AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Ms. Pooja Giri, Advs.versusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj (SPC) and Mr. Soumyadip Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Garg, PC for GNCTD with Ms. Pallavi, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 13.03.2026 REVIEW PET. 105/2026 (review of the order dated 29.01.2026)1. The order dated 29.01.2026 is clarified to the extent that the entitlement of the petitioner will have to be considered in accordance with the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme, 2018 [Scheme of 2018].2. Whether the petitioner would fall within the definition of victim, and whether his case deserved to be considered as per the definition ofvictim as prescribed in Section 2(k) of the Scheme of 2018 are issueswhich have to be decided by the authorities.3. The observations made by the Court in its order dated 29.01.2026, shall not be treated as conclusive fin...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »