Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tilak Raj Bhola & Anr. vs Madhusudhan Bhola & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 226/2026, CM APPL. 6032/2026 &CM APPL. 6033/2026 TILAK RAJ BHOLA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Lalit Bhardwaj and Mr. Jatin Anand Dwivedi, Advocates.versusMADHUSUDHAN BHOLA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the impugned order dated 14th August, 2025, passed by the learned trial court in CS DJ No. 4166/2024.3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, alongwith pending applications, if any. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/MR/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning ...
Sewa Lal & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 752/2026 SEWA LAL & ORS. ....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ritesh Patil, AdvocateversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2992/2026 (delay of 38 days)1. By way of the present application, the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 38 days in re-filing the present petition.2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 38 days in re- filing the present petition is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of CRL.M.C. 752/20264. By way of the instant petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing No. 726/2024 registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy, Outer North (Delhi) for the commission of offence punishable under Sections and Section 8/12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter POCSO Act) and the consequential proceedings arising out o...
All India Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Railway Employees Asso ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 308/2026, CRL.M.As. 2956-57/2026 ALL INDIA SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES RAILWAY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS CEC PRESIDENT MILIND V AWAD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Tanushree Kapur and Ms. Palak Batra, Advocates.versusCHAIRMAN OF RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra Solanki, CGSC with Ms. Aishwarya Sinha and Mr. Siddharth Bajaj, Advocates for R-1 to R-3. Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks appropriate reliefs as under: A. Issue a writ, order or directing the Respondents No. 1 to 3 to circulating, or extending any administrative support, facilities, benefits or privileges as under Master Circular No. 65 to the certified list of elected office bearers of the...
Suraj Singh vs State of Delhi and Ors & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 745/2026 SURAJ SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Sharma & Ms. Rema Raina, Advocates.versusSTATE OF DELHI AND ORS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with SI Pardeep, PS Rani Bagh. Mr.l Santosh Kr. Rout, Standing Counsel for R-2/SBI. [M:- 9990432878]CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2964/2026(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 745/20261. The petitioner has filed this petition for quashing of FIR No. District, Delhi, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. The contention of the petitioner is that the dispute has been settled between the petitioner and the State Bank of India, which is the complainantrespondent No. 2 herein. However, the settlement deed has CRL.M.C. 745/2026 Page 1 of 2 not been filed. Instead, a copy of another document, namely a Reconveyan...
The Commissioner Cgst Delhi West Commissionerate & Anr. vs Shri B K Pa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1226/2026, CAV 42/2026, CM APPL. 5978/2026 and CM APPL. 5979/2026 THE COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI WEST COMMISSIONERATE & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC.versusSHRI B K PABRI AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. S K Gupta, Mr. Rajinder Khatter, Mr. Udit Gupta, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJ.ANORDER% 29.01.20261. Through the present Petition, the Petitioners assail thecorrectness of the order dated 02.09.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, whereby the Disciplinary Enquiry Report and the Disciplinary Order, which had been affirmed by the Appellate Authority on appeal, were set aside on the following two grounds: i. The Department did not examine any witness in support of the Memorandum of Charges; and ii. The disciplinary proceedings initiated against Respondent No.1 were time-barred under Rule 9(2)(b) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rule...
Gurcharan Singh & Ors. vs the State of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 740/2026, CRL.M.A. 2941-2942/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.S. Juneja, Mr. J.S. Juneja, Advocates with petitioners.versusTHE STATE OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with SI Sumeet Ponia, P.S. Vivek Vihar. Mr. Ashish K. Singh with Mr. A.K. Sharma, Ms. Shalu and Mr. M.K. Goswami, Advocates for R2 with R2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Ashish K. Singh, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2 complainant.2. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 71/2023 dated 16.02.2023, lodged at Police Station Vivek Vihar, Di...
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd vs Rajender @ Bunty
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 13th January 2026Pronounced on : 29th January 2026Uploaded on : 30th January 2026 + MAC.APP. 517/2018 & CM APPL. 22859/2018 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD.....Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv.versusRAJENDER @ BUNTY .....Respondent Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advs. + MAC.APP. 799/2019 RAJENDER @ BUNTY .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advs.versusBHARTI AXA GEN INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. These appeals have been filed by insurance company and the claimant respectively. The Insurance company has filed the appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (MV Act), seeking to set aside theMAC.APP. 517/2018 & MAC.APP. 799/2019 Page 1/13 impugned judgment and award dated 20th February 2018 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Princy Misra & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~P-1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 05.12.2025Pronounced on: 29.01.2026Uploaded on: 29.01.2026 + MAC.APP. 999/2013 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Mr. Amit Gaur, Ms. Sweta Sinha, Advocates.versusSMT PRINCY MISRA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Ms. Aastha Chauhan, Ms. Anjali Singh and Mr. R.K. Jain, Advocates for R-1 to 3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. The appellant Oriental Insurance Company Limited [InsuranceCompany] challenges an award dated 21.09.2013, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [the Tribunal] in MACT No. 205/2011. By the said award, the Tribunal granted compensation at Rs. 69,48,600/-, alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum. A. FACTS AND IMPUGNED AWARD2. The proceedings before the Tribunal arose from a fatal accident, which took place on 10.03.2011 at about 8:30 PM, resulting in the death of one Mr. Naveen Kumar Misra. The deceased was riding his Signe...
National Projects Contruction Coproation Ltd. vs Paragon Construction ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~R-7* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS) 519/2009 NATIONAL PROJECTS CONTRUCTION COPROATION LTD. .....Appellant Through: None.versusPARAGON CONSTRUCTION INDIA PVT LD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Mr. Nalin, Ms. Ramya, Ms. Krishna, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 29.01.2026 CM APPL. 15539/20091. This is an application filed by the Appellant under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking condonation of delay of 59 days in re-filing the present appeal.2. The matter was called out twice in the revised call; however, none appears on behalf of the appellant to press this application.3. Since no sufficient cause has been shown for condoning the delay, the present application is consequently rejected. FAO(OS) 519/20094. The present appeal is one of the oldest matters listed for hearing in the category of Regular Matters.5. In view of the order passed above, the present appeal...
Sukgo Plywood vs Bses Rajdhni Power Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 292/2009 SUKGO PLYWOOD .....Appellant Through: None.versusBSES RAJDHNI POWER LTD. .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 and Section151 of the CPC seeks following prayers:- a. accept the present appeal; b. set aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 02.04.09 whereby the suit bearing number as 117/07 of the appellant was dismissed c. declare the inspection report dated 18.07.07, speaking order dated 28.09.07 and the impugned demand of Rs10.90,407/- raised by the respondent in pursuance to an inspection dated 18.07.07 at the premises bearing no 521,522 Village Neb Sarai, Vasant Kunj as null and void, d. restrain the respondent from contemplating any action pursuant to the inspection report dated 18.07.07, Speaking order dated 28.09.07 and from enforcing the impugned demand of Rs. 10,9...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »