Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagvir Singh vs Income Tax Employees Federation & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12801/2025, CM APPL. 52239/2025, CM APPL. APPL. 5782/2026, CM APPL. 5783/2026, CM APPL. 5852/2026 & CM APPL. 5853/2026 JAGVIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vaibhav Trivedi, Adv.versusINCOME TAX EMPLOYEES FEDERATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neha Rastogi, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Animesh Rastogi, Mr. Rajat Dubey, Mr. Shashank Pandey, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.01.20261. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22.07.2024 whereby, his primary membership in Income Tax Employees Federation Delhi Circle New Delhi [federation] has been suspended.2. At the outset, respondents nos. 1 and 2, in their respective counteraffidavits, have objected to the maintainability of this petition. It is highlighted that respondents nos. 1 and 2, against which the relief is sought, are not instrumentalities of the State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Furt...
Tata Aig General Insurance Company vs Mukesh Kumar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 17th January 2026 Pronounced on: 29th January 2026 Uploaded on : 30th January 2026 + MAC.APP. 560/2025 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vaibhav Singh, Adv.versusMUKESH KUMAR AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Tanya Singh & Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advs. for R-1 & 2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENT1. This appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company under Section173 of The Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (MV Act) for setting aside/modifying the final judgment and award dated 19th May 2025 passed by Presiding Officer - MACT, South East District, Saket Court, Delhi in MACT No. 912/2019. The claim filed by the claimants (respondent nos. 1 and 2), on account of the death of Master Kannu Pal, was allowed by the Tribunal, and an award of Rs. 16,25,894/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum was passed.2. The appellant-Insurance Company seeks modification of the award on the ...
Chirag Goel vs Ramesh Chander Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~5 & 6* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 29.01.2026 + FAO(OS) 127/2025 DAYA KISHAN GOEL ....Appellant SHRI RAMESH CHANDER GOEL .....Respondent + FAO(OS) 128/2025 CHIRAG GOEL .....Appellant RAMESH CHANDER GOEL .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARJUDGMENT1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The present appeals have been filed assailing the Order dated28.08.2025 passed in I.A. No. 16751/2025 in CS (OS) 1239/2008 and I.A. No. 16971/2025 in CS (OS) 1240/2008, inter alia, the application of the appellant filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC has been dismissed.3. It is pertinent to note that the appellant had earlier also filed Signed By:PRATIBHA FAO(OS) 127/2025 & FAO(OS) 128/2025 Page 1 of 4applications under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, which were dismissed by the Single Judge of this Court. The appeals filed by the appellant challenging the said order were also dismissed by the ...
Sumit Bansal vs Mgi Developers and Promoters Through Its Proprietor Sh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 203/2025 SUMIT BANSAL .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Rameezuddin Raja, Ms.Pepakayala Geetanjali & Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocates along with Petitioner in personversusMGI DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH. MANOJ KUMAR GOYAL & ANR. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Ms. Stuti Jain, Mr. Akshu Jain & Ms. Vishwa Bharti, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 29.01.2026 EX.APPL.(OS) 134/20261. By way of the present application, under Section 151 of theCivil Procedure Code, 1908, the Applicant/ Judgment Debtor seeks the following reliefs: - a) report the alleged cash transaction amounting to Rs. 1,08,71,200/- to the jurisdictional Income Tax Department for verification and for determination of any breach of the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and direct the Income Tax Authority to file a compliance-cum-status report before this Hon'ble Court. b) report the al...
M/S Ashok Kumar Contractors vs Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1429/2025 M/S ASHOK KUMAR CONTRACTORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harry Chhibber, Mr. Sanchit Gupta, Mr. Rajat Kashyap, Mr. Yati Dharna, Advocates (M:9205437671)versusINSTITUTE OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AND ALLIED SCIENCES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC with Ms. Ankita Bhadouriya, Ms. Ishika Jain, Advocates (M:9911991166)CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 29.01.20261. The present is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes between the parties, arising out of the construction contract dated 24th November, 2020.2. In reply, the respondent, i.e., Institute of Human Behaviour and AlliedSciences, has taken a preliminary objection that the petitioner has not invoked the arbitration as per the procedure stipulated under Clause 25 of the construction contract, as entered between the parties...
National Investment and Infrastructure Fund Ltd vs Micro and Small Ent ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14109/2025 & CM APPL. 57811/2025 NATIONAL INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE FUND LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Agrawal, Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Ms. Akansha, Advs.versusMICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL SOUTH REVENUE DISTRICT & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Suraj Kumar Vishwakarma, Adv. for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that theproceedings against it are non est in the eyes of law as the respondent- Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council does not have any jurisdiction to deal with the controversy involved herein.2. According to him, the dispute originates from a works-contract of theyear 2016 for a highway project in Jammu and Kashmir with the Navayuga Engineering Company Limited (NECL) and respondent no.2. Thereafter, respondent no. 2 is stated to have raised a claim for recovery of dues allegedly att...
Dr. Raman Mahindra vs Dr Rohit Mahindra & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3635/2024 & CM APPL. 61158/2024 DR. RAMAN MAHINDRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kritika Gupta, Advocate.versusDR ROHIT MAHINDRA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Sethi, Mr. B. Anand and Mr. Neeraj Kargeti, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Mr. Nikhil Palli, Advocate for R-3/MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition hasbecome infructuous in view of the framing of issues and the matter now being at the stage of recording of evidence. It is prayed that the petition be disposed of accordingly, with liberty to avail appropriate remedies, if needed.3. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous, with liberty to the petitioner as sought, in accordance with law. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, ...
Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede vs Red Chillies Entertainments Pvt. Ltd. and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIBEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV + CS (OS) 698/2025, I.A. No. 24508/2025, I.A. No. 24510/2025 & I.A. No. 28922/2025 Between:- SAMEER DNYANDEV WANKHEDE 204, A-WING, ROYAL CLASSIC NEW LINK ROAD, ANDHERI (W) MUMBAI 400053 .....PLAINTIFF (Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shaktiki Sharma, Ms. Purnima Vashishtha, Mr. Jatin Parashar, Mr. Rohit Bhagat, Mr. Kunal Vats, Ms. Aprajita, Ms. Tanya Arora and Mr. Sanyam, Advocates.)versus1. RED CHILLIES ENTERTAINMENTS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE PLOT NO 612, RAMKRISHNA MISSION ROAD 15TH CROSS ROAD, SANTACRUZ (WEST) MUMBAI 4000542. NETFLIX ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES INDIA LLP LEVEL 11, GODREJ BKC, PLOT C 68 G-BLOCK, BKC-BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI 400051, INDIA3. X CORPFORMERLY KNOWN AS TWITTER INC THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE 1355, MARKET STREET, SUITE 900 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103, USA HAVING ITS INDIA OFFICE AT: 12TH FLOOR, THE ESTATE, DICKENSON R...
Sanjay Goel vs State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7057/2025 SANJAY GOEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shorya Goel, Mr. Sammeer Vatts, Advocates alongwith Petitioner in Person.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State Mr. Namanveer Singh Sodhi, Advocate alongwith R-2 & 3 in Person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 29.01.20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 39/2020 dated 06.03.2020, lodged at Police Station Defence Colony, Delhi, under Sections 406/420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Namanveer Singh Sodhi, learned counsel, acc...
Union of India & Ors. vs Ex Sgt Uttam Kumar Rak
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 29.01.2026 + W.P.(C) 14905/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: T.P. Singh, SPGversusEX SGT UTTAM KUMAR RAK .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 61342/2025 (Exemption)1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 14905/2025 & CM APPL. 61341/20253. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India against the order dated 23.11.2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A] No. 182/2019 titled as Ex SGT Uttam Kumar Rai vs. Union of India & Ors.4. The relevant facts, briefly stated, giving rise to the present writpetition are as follows: 4.1. The respondent, having been found medically and physically fit, was ...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »