Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd vs Naresh Chander & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 19th January 2026Pronounced on : 29th January 2026Uploaded on : 30th January 2026 + MAC.APP. 664/2018, CM APPL. 28792/2018 & CM APPL. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Ms. Mouli Sharma, Advocates.versusNARESH CHANDER & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Akash Singh, Ms. Priyanka S Aneja, Advocates for R-1 & R-2.ANISH DAYAL, J.1. This appeal has been filed under Section 173 of Motor VehiclesAct, 1988 [MV Act] by the Insurance Company [appellant] for setting aside/modification of the impugned judgment and award dated 23 rd April 2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohini Courts, Delhi (MACT) in MAC PETITION NO. 5483/16 [Old MACP NO. & Ors..2. The basic grievance of appellant/Insurance Company relates to thecomputation of income by the MACT of the deceased at Rs.18,222/- per month, which was a combination of Rs.7,722/- per month claimed...
Ashok Goel vs State Bank of Patiala and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7630/2010 ASHOK GOEL .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSTATE BANK OF PATIALA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Standing Counsel with Mr. Akshit Kapur, AoR and Ms. Riya Sood, Advocates for SBICORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner had informed on 04.11.2025 that the Petitioner has died.2. None is present on behalf of the Petitioner today.3. Present Petition is accordingly dismissed in default and for non- prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JANUARY 29, 2026 NThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 15:00:37...
Raisina Bengali School vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~23 & 24* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5431/2017 & CM APPL. 16273/2020 RAISINA BENGALI SCHOOL .....Petitioner GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4559/2020 & CM APPL. 16472/2020 RAISINA BENGALI SCHOOL SOCIETY AND ANR & ANR. .....Petitioners GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 29.01.20261. These two writ petitions, though instituted at different points of time, W.P.(C) 5431/2017 having been filed in 2017 and W.P.(C) 4559/2020 in 2020, raise a common grievance and are accordingly being disposed of by W.P.(C) 5431/2017 & W.P.(C) 4559/2020 Page 1 of 4 this common order.2. At the time of filing, the petitions sought multiple reliefs. The livecontroversy, however, lies in a narrow compass. The Petitioners, as submitted by counsel, now only assail the action of the Directorate of Education (DoE), Government of NCT of Delhi, in appointing a Head of School (...
Iqbal Ahmed ( Since Deceased) Thr His Lrs & Anr vs Islamuddin & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 742/2018, CM APPL. 26595/2018 & CM APPL. 5815/2024 IQBAL AHMED (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LRS &ANR .....Petitioners Through: None.versusISLAMUDDIN& ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate through VC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the matter is passed over and be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/MR/ABK At 2:40 PM3. At this stage, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite a pass over.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/MR/ABKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downl...
M/S S.S. Bedi & Sons vs Delhi State Industrial Development
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~R-8* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS) 524/2009 & CM APPL. 15629/2009 M/S S.S. BEDI & SONS .....Appellant Through: None.versusDELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 29.01.20261. The present appeal is one of the oldest matters listed for hearing in the category of Regular Matters.2. The matter was called out twice in the revised call; however, none appears on behalf of the appellant.3. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J JANUARY 29, 2026/neha/myThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 12:35:00...
Maruti Agencies vs Adidas India Marketing Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~R10* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS) 571/2009 MARUTI AGENCIES .....Appellant Through: None.versusADIDAS INDIA MARKETING PVT LTD & ANR.....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 29.01.20261. The present appeal is one of the oldest matters listed for hearing in the category of Regular Matters.2. The matter was called out twice in the revised call, however, none appeared on behalf of the parties.3. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.4. Interim order(s), if any, stands discharged. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J JANUARY 29, 2026/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:25:53...
Jagdish Pershad Tyagi & Ors vs Saroj Tyagi & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 3454/2014, I.A. 15196/2017 & I.A. 14667/2018 JAGDISH PERSHAD TYAGI & ORS .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. J.K. Srivastava and Ms. Taruna, Advs.versusSAROJ TYAGI & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Mudit Sood and Mr. Udit Grover, Advs. for D-1 & 2. Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Ms. Mansi Aggarwal, Advs. for D-3 to 7. Mr. Abhishek Gupta and Mr. Piyush Goel, Advs. for LRs of D-9.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 29.01.20261. In this suit for partition, preliminary decree was passed vide orderdated 18.10.2024 declaring the shares of parties, which have been detailed in para 7 of the said order. Vide same order, a Local Commissioner was also appointed to visit the property, interact with the parties and suggest the mode of partition.2. The learned Local Commissioner has filed his report dated11.12.2024 wherein he has stated that the property bearing no.266, Village Hauz Rani, Opposite Press Enclave, New Delhi-1100...
M/S Keller Ground Engineering India Pvt Ltd vs M/S Zillion Infraprojec ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1160/2016 M/S KELLER GROUND ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Dr. Madhumita Kothari, Adv. (through VC)versusM/S ZILLION INFRAPROJECTS PVT LTD AND ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Anirban Bhattacharya & Mr. Aakash Bhatt, Advs. for D-1 & Counter Claimant. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 29.01.2026 I.A. 27384/20251. This application is filed on behalf of the defendant no.1 seeking withdrawal of the counter-claim on the ground of having arrived at a settlement with the plaintiff.2. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed.3. The counter-claim CC (COMM) No. 75 of 2017 is dismissed as withdrawn. CS(COMM) 1160/20164. Learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks permission to withdraw the suit in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.5. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications stands dismissed. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 ...
Medical Council of India vs Anshu Sethi Bajaj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7620/2017 & CM APPL. 31337/2021, CM APPL. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. T Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty and Mr. Vedant Sood, Advs.versusANSHU SETHI BAJAJ .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin Soni & Mr. Deepjyot Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.01.20261. Through the present writ petition, the Petitioner calls inquestion correctness of the order dated 10.08.2017 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in OA No.1623/2017, wherein the learned CAT disposed of the original application with following observations : 14. We are, therefore, of the considered opinion that the suspension of the applicant in the given circumstances is not sustainable in law. The OA is accordingly allowed with the following directions:(1) Suspension of the applicant beyond initial 90 days is hereby set aside and quashed.(2) As a consequenc...
Vishu Basoya and Ors vs State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
$~77 to 79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5021/2025 HUSAN BANO .....Petitioner versusTHE STATE (GOVT OF NCT) DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents+ CRL.M.C. 5036/2025 KANIKA SHEKHAWAT .....Petitioner versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR & ANR. .....Respondents+ CRL.M.C. 240/2026 VISHU BASOYA AND ORS .....Petitioners versusSTATE AND ANR .....RespondentsAppearances: Mr. Ganesh Gaurav Singh, Advocate for petitioner in item 77 and for R-2 in item 78 Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Chirag Gautam, Advocates for R-2 in item 77 and for petitioner in item 78 Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State Mr. Neeraj Yadav and Mr. Rohit Yadav, Advocates for R-2 in item 79 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 28.01.2026 1. The petitions are taken up for hearing together with the consent ofCRL.M.C. 5021/2025 & connected matters Page 1 of 7This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »