Delhi Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hari Kishan Sharma and Ors vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 18/2026 HARI KISHAN SHARMA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rambir Singh, Advocate. Petitioner No.1 and Petitioner No.3 in-person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. Ms. Madhu Batra, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 05.01.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the husband and in-laws of the complainant/respondent No.2, seek quashing of case FIR No.768/2022 dated 14.11.2022 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S.: Dwarka North, Delhi.2. The petition is premised on Settlement Deed/Memo of Understanding/ Compromise Deed dated 22.12.2025 arrived at between the parties.3. The petition is supported by affidavits of the petitioners, as also of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs.4. The pa...
Naveen Yadav & Ors. vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 23/2026 NAVEEN YADAV & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Jyoti Thakur, AdvocateversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State with Ms. Pragati Gupta, Advocate alongwith ASI Umesh Chand, P.S.-K.N.K Marg, Rohini Mr. Himanshu Mahajan, Advocate for R-2CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 05.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 33/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 23/20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 142/2023 dated 08.04.2023, registered at Police Station K.N. Katju Marg, for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the grou...
Jsw Steel Ltd vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
$~3 & 5.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 2/2026 JSW STEEL LTD .....Appellant UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Mr. Advocates for R-3. + LPA 4/2026, CM APPL. 279/2026, CM APPL. 280/2026, CM APPL. ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Mr. JSW STEEL LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents LPA 2/2026 & LPA 4/2026 Page 1 of 4Advocates for R1. Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Advocates for R-2 and 3.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 05.01.2026 CM APPL. 65/2026 & CM APPL. 66/2026 in LPA 2/20261. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The Applications stand disposed of. CM APPL. 67/2026 in LPA 2/20263. For the reasons stated in the Application, the permission is granted to file lengthy list of dates.4. The Application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 68/2026 in LPA 2/20265. For the ...
Cyret Technologies India Private Limited vs Pernod Ricard India Privat ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 12/2026 CYRET TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Dhir, Advocate (Through VC)versusPERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Krishan Tewary, Advocate and Ms. Malvikka Arya, Advocate (Through VC) Mob: 9899264894 Email: [email protected]:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 05.01.20261. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner underSections 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal, which has already expired on 24th November, 2025.2. It is submitted that the final hearing already stands concluded on 11thSeptember, 2025 and only the award needs to be passed. Thus, the present petition has been filed praying for granting an extension of the term/mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a further period of six months. Learned counsel for the petitioner further...
Saurav Gupta vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 04.11.2025Pronounced on : 05.01.2026Uploaded on : 05.01.2026 + CRL.A. 1062/2016 SAURAV GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Stuti Gujral, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Miran Ahmad, and Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocates with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State with SI Ashwani Yadav, P.S. Kotla MubarakpurCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order onsentence dated 17.09.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- 02, South-East District, Saket Courts, in SC No. 1832/2016 arising out of FIR No. 195/2014 registered at P.S. Kotla Mubarakpur, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 394 IPC and acquitted of the charge under Section 397 IPC. Vide the impugned order on sentence, the appellant was directed to undergo RI for 5 years along with paying a fine of Rs.1...
Mukesh Kumar vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.12.2025Judgment pronounced on: 05.01.2026Judgment uploaded on: 12.01.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 495/2017 MUKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush, Amicus Curiae along with the petitioner-in- person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the StateCORAM:HONBLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTIndex to the JudgmentFACTUAL BACKGROUND .................................................................. 2 SUBMISSIONS BEFORE THE COURT ............................................. 4 ANALYSIS & FINDINGS ..................................................................... 6 A. Testimonies of the Prosecution witnesses ................................................. 7 B. Recovery of the Alleged Stolen Property ................................................... 9 C. Whether the Ingredients of Robbery Are Made Out ............................ 10 D. Whether the Offence of Theft Is Made Out ........
Vicky vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 4339/2025, CRL.M.A. 39032/2025 VICKY ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Ms. Priyam Agrawal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar & Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICESHAIL JAINHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 02.01.20261. The present Petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, seeking the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus for the production of one Ms Shivani, in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondents.2. The brief facts, as stated in the Petition, are that the Petitioner hereinmarried Ms Shivani on 06.12.2025. Ms Shivani is stated to be a major, her date of birth being November 2006. It is further stated that on the same day as that of the solemnization of marriage between the parties, the family members of Ms Shivani, namely ...
Adib Saifi vs the State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 4340/2025 ADIB SAIFI .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in personversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Ms. Priyam Agrawal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar & Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. Inspector Narender Singh along with SI Ashish Panwar, PS Ghazipur, DelhiCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAINHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 02.01.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.M.A. 39033/2025 (for exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 4340/20253. This Petition has been filed by the Petitioner, Mr Adib Saifi, underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus seeking production of his wife, namely Ms Jainab.4. Issue notice. Ld. Counsel for Respondent No. 1, Government of NCT of Del...
Shiva Alias Uwan vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 02.01.2026 + W.P.(CRL) 4337/2025 SHIVA ALIAS UWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Tiwari Adv.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC with Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. SI Vikram P, PS Paharganj.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINMADHU JAIN , J. (ORAL)1. The present petition has been filed seeking extension of theparole granted to the petitioner vide order dated 28.10.2025, passed in W.P.(CRL) 3478/2025 titled as Shiva @ Uwan vs. State (NCT of Delhi). The said parole was granted for a period of four weeks, which is expiring today.2. In the meantime, the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking extension of the parole period on the ground that his wife has suffered a miscarriage and requires continued medical care and assistance3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the StateW.P.(CRL) 4337/2025 Page 1 of 2 submits that they h...
Mohd Fahad vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5086/2025, & CRL.M.A. 39017/2025 MOHD FAHAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Jain and Mr. M.M Khan, Advs.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Ravinder PS HZN.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAINORDER% 02.01.2026 This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CRL.M.A. 39017/20251. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. Application is accordingly disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 5086/2025 3 This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.4. This is a petition under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. 2023 read with Section439 Cr.P.C. seeking interim bail for a period of two months in FIR No.116/2023 filed under Sections 302/201/363/120-B/34 of Indian Penal Code,1860 registered at P.S. Hazrat Nizamuddin on the ground that the petitioners father is scheduled to undergo surgery on 4th January, 2026.5. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioners father is suffering ...
- ‹ Prev
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 370
- 371
- 372
- Next ›