Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Steelcrete Private Limited vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~51, 52 & 53 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:3. d August, 2018 versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS STEELCRETE PRIVATE LIMITED UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus APEEJAY PRIVATE LIMITED UNION OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 9988/2015 + W.P.(C) 10285/2015 + W.P.(C) 9992/2015 Present : Mr. Randhir Jain and Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advocates for CORAM: petitioners in all items. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC alongwith Mr. Gopal Banik, DEO, LAC (South-East) in all items. Mr. Rohit Jain & Ms. Madhu Sweta, Advocates for R-2/NHAI in all items. ........ RESPONDENTS APPEJAY HOUSE PVT. LTD. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ Petitioner HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Three identical writ petitions have been instituted by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking identical directions from this C...
Pr. Commissioner of Customs, Preventive Commissionerate vs.k v K Sesha ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 03, 2018 CUSAA1682018, C.M. Appl. No.30946-30947/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant COL. SANJEEV SETHI ..... Respondent CUSAA1692018, C.M. Appl. No.30948-30949/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS K.NARAYAN RAO versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent CUSAA1702018, C.M. Appl. No.30953-30954/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PREVENTIVE COMMISSIONERATE versus ..... Appellant K V K SESHAVATRAM, ..... Respondent CUSAA1712018, C.M. Appl. No.30955-30956/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant PVN VIJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent CUSAA1722018, C.M. Appl. No.30957-30958/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS M.SUDHAKAR RAO versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellant CUSAA1732018, C.M. Appl. No.30959-30960/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + N.V.VARDARAJULU CUSAA No.168 to 172/2018 Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Mr. Harpreet Singh, S...
Neelam vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + NEELAM CRL.M.C. 3890/2018 ........ Petitioner Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Rashid Hashmi, Advocate along with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Lala Ram, PS I.P. Lodhi Colony Mr. Alok K. Agarwal with Mr. Naveen Chawla, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 29242/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exception. CRL.M.C.3890/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.11/2014 under CRL.M.C. 3890/2018 Page 1 of 3 SectionsIPC, Police Station I.P. Lodhi Road and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom, based on a settlement. Subject FIR emanates out of a financial dispute between the parties.2. Learned counsel for the parties inform th...
M/S Mex Switchgears Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Omex Cables Industries & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 267/2017 & CM No.36340/2017 Reserved on :17. h May, 2018 Date of decision :3. d August, 2018 M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT LTD . .... Appellant Through : Mr. Shailen Bhatia, Mr. Amit Jain, Ms. Ekta Nayyar and Ms. Neelam Pathak, Advs. versus M/S OMEX CABLES INDUSTRIES & ANR..... RESPONDENTS Through : Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appellant before us had filed CS(OS) No.2247/2015, Mex Switchgears Pvt. Ltd. v Omex Cables Industries &Anr. against the respondents before the Original Side of this court.2. In the plaint, the plaintiff claimed that it has an exclusive right over the word MEX, both by virtue of trademark registration and the presence of the word MEX in its corporate name. It has further been claimed by the plaintiff that it has attained an enviable reputation and goodwill for its trademark MEX. FAO(OS) No.267/2017& CM No.36340/2017 Pag...
Sat Parkash Tokas vs.sandeep Chatwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
#49 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8057/2018 & CM No.30876/2018 (stay) SAT PARKASH TOKAS ........ Petitioner versus SANDEEP CHATWAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel along with Mr. Shashi Gupta, Mr. Deepak Sharma and Mr. Manish, Advocates. Advocate for SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prays as follows:-"a) the respondents to immediately demolish the illegal structure raised by respondent No.1 at 45, Arjun Nagar, Safdarjung Enclave, Village Humayun Pur, New Delhi- 110029, comprised in khasra No.53, owned by the petitioner; b) grant the costs of the instant writ petition; c) grant any other order or relief in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents, deemed fit and proper in the facts and c...
pr.commissioner of Customs vs.m.sudhakar Rao
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 03, 2018 CUSAA1682018, C.M. Appl. No.30946-30947/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant COL. SANJEEV SETHI ..... Respondent CUSAA1692018, C.M. Appl. No.30948-30949/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS K.NARAYAN RAO versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent CUSAA1702018, C.M. Appl. No.30953-30954/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PREVENTIVE COMMISSIONERATE versus ..... Appellant K V K SESHAVATRAM, ..... Respondent CUSAA1712018, C.M. Appl. No.30955-30956/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant PVN VIJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent CUSAA1722018, C.M. Appl. No.30957-30958/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS M.SUDHAKAR RAO versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellant CUSAA1732018, C.M. Appl. No.30959-30960/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + N.V.VARDARAJULU CUSAA No.168 to 172/2018 Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Mr. Harpreet Singh, S...
Akhilesh Gautam & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3905/2018 AKHILESH GAUTAM & ORS versus THE STATE& ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sanjay Kaushik, P.S. Sarai Rohilla Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocate . For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29278/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3905/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.134 of 2015 under Sections 498A/34 of the IPC, Police Station Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged CRL.M.C. 3905/2018 Page 1 of 3 consequent to a matrimonial discord.2.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioners No.2 and 3 are the parents of petitioner No.1.3. Learned counsels for the parties s...
M/S Himangni Enterprises vs.kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~49 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 880/2018, CAV7012018 & CM APPL. 31004- 31005/2018 Date of decision:03. 08.2018 M/S HIMANGNI ENTERPRISES ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikas Arora, Ms. Radhika Arora, Advs. versus KAMALJEET SINGH AHLUWALIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anil Sapla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Preetpal Singh, Mr. Sameer Choudhary, Mr. Sarthak Katyal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA % ORDER (ORAL) 03.08.2018 ANU MALHOTRA, J.CM APPL. 31004/2018 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 880/2018 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 19.07.2018 of the learned Additional District Judge-07, CM(M) 880/2018 Page 1 of 11 South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in case titled as Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia Vs. M/s. Himangi Enterprises in the Suit No.208176/16, vide application under Order VI Rule 17 r/w Section 151 CPC fi...
Avantika Elcon Private Limited vs.miraenan Tech Co, Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$-13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d August, 2018 O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 127/2018 AVANTIKA ELCON PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashim Vaccher, Mr.P.Piyush, Mr.Sumeet, Advs. versus MIRAENAN TECH CO, LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kamal Mehta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner inter alia making the following prayers:-"a. pass an order thereby restraining the Respondent, its successors, employees, representatives, assigns etc. from entering into any agreement with any other third party for the products i.e. Retro Reflective Conspicuity Tapes for which approval have been obtained by the... Petitioner Company; and in the alternative and without prejudice to the b. prayer clause (a), as detailed hereinabove, in the event of Respondent Company having already entere...
Sheikh Aftab Ahmed Jamlana & Ors vs.akhtari Begum & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d August, 2018. RSA752018 SHEIKH AFTAB AHMED JAMLANA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Himal Akhatar & Mr. Imran Kamal, Advs. Versus AKHTARI BEGUM & ANR Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.18747/2018 (for exemption) ........ RESPONDENTS 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. RSA752018, CM No.18746/2018 (for stay), CM No.18748/2018 (for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal) & CM No.18749/2018 (u/S151CPC) 3. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 29th November, 2017 in RCA No.1211/of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Central District]. of dismissal of the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellants / plaintiffs against the judgment and decree [dated 18th February, 2012 in Suit No.145/(Unique Case ID RSA752018 Page 1 of 9 No.02401C0005401998)...