Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Federation of Okhla Industrial Association (Regd.) vs.lt Governor of D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-04-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :22. d May, 2018 Date of decision :4. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8125/2016 & CM No.3362/2016 FEDERATION OF OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION (REGD.) versus LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS ....... Petitioner + W.P.(C) 12088/2016 & CM Nos.9316/2017, 10386/2017 & 14678/2017 APEX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY OF NCT DELHI ........ Petitioner LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus versus DELHI FACTORY OWNERS' FEDERATION ....... Petitioner LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ANR. + W.P.(C) 2658/2017 & CM No.11560/2017 + W.P.(C) 3360/2017 & CM No.14703/2017 ....... RESPONDENTS AUTOMOBILE TRADERS ASSOCIATION OF DELHI LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 3385/2017 & CM No.14800/2017 + W.P.(C) 3684/2017 & CM No.16236/2017 versus COLORWHEEL LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner SEVEN SEAS HOSPITALITY PVT LTD ........ Petitioner versus WP(C) 521...
Deepayan Mohanty vs.cargill India Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19th July, 2018 Date of Decision:3. d August,, 2018 + CS (OS) 1157/2014& I.As.317/2016, 1042/2016, 3045/2016, 3047/2016 DEEPAYAN MOHANTY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Puri and Mr. Aditya Chhibber, Advocates (M- 9810646822). versus CARGILL INDIA PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate for Defendant No.1 (M-9810311218) Mr. Shadan Farasat and Mr. Ahmed Said, Advocates for D-2 & 3(M- 9818009824). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiff, Mr. Deepayan Mohanty (hereinafter Plaintiff) has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII CPC seeking recovery of a sum of Rs. 3,25,56,496/- along with interest against the Defendants which are the Cargill Group of Companies (hereinafter together referred as Cargill). Cargill India Pvt. Ltd (Defendant No.1) is the Indian subsidiary of the Cargill Group. The Plaintiff was employed in Defe...
Sachin vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3873/2018 Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 SACHIN versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Nadeem Abbasi, Adv. For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State With SI Manjeet Kumar JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.104 of 2017 under Sections 308 of the IPC registered at Police Station Fatehpur Beri, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The parties were in relationship of employer and employee. The complainant was employee of the petitioner. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a dispute which occurred as the complainant CRL.M.C. 3873/2018 Page 1 of 3 refused to follow the instructions of the petitioner and in the fit of the rage, petitioner pushed the complainant and he fell down the stairs.3. It is contend...
Madhav Sengar vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 526/2018 Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 MADHAV SENGAR ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Manan, Sr.Adv with Mr.Ankush Narang, Ms.Bhavya Chauhan, Ms.Shivani Kant, Mr.Mukul Aggarwal and Ms.Akansha Mehrotra, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with SI Ishwar Singh, P.S.Jaitpur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.80/2018 under Section 307 IPC Police Station Jaitpur. Allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner who was the tutor for the son of the complainant had attempted to strangulate the son. The petitioner was also a tenant in the property of the complainant. BAIL APPLN. 526/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. There...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd vs.rekha & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~10 * % + MAC.APP. 330/2017 & CM APPLs. 12622/2017, 12624/2017 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Date of Decision:03. d August, 2018 Through: Mr.Brijesh Bagga, Advocate versus REKHA & ORS Through: Mr.Jatinder Kamra, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.61,14,000/- has been awarded to respondent No.1 to 5. The appellant is seeking reduction of the award amount.2. The accident dated 16th February, 2016 resulted in the death of Shish Pal Singh. The deceased was working as Constable with Delhi Police earning Rs.35,890/- per month at the time of the accident. The deceased was aged 44 years at the time of accident and was survived by his widow, two sons and two daughters out of which one son and one daughter were married.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.35,890/- per month,...
Mahipal Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4601/2013 & CM No.14524/2017 Reserved on:5. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:3. d August, 2018 MAHIPAL SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. B.S. Nagar, Adv. with Mr.Abhinav Goyal, Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. Mr.Gautam Narayan, amicus curiae versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1/UOI with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. S.K. Dubey and Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advs. for R-3 to 5 Mr. Ruchir Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. for IOA CORAM:-"HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. (JUDGMENT) Embittered at what they perceive to be the hegemonic control exercised by Respondent No.4, and his wife Respondent No.5, over the Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India (AKFI) and its affairs, the petitioners, who claim to have earned gold medals for the nation in the international Kabaddi arena, have invoked the extraord...
Apeejay Private Limited vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~51, 52 & 53 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:3. d August, 2018 versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS STEELCRETE PRIVATE LIMITED UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus APEEJAY PRIVATE LIMITED UNION OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 9988/2015 + W.P.(C) 10285/2015 + W.P.(C) 9992/2015 Present : Mr. Randhir Jain and Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advocates for CORAM: petitioners in all items. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC alongwith Mr. Gopal Banik, DEO, LAC (South-East) in all items. Mr. Rohit Jain & Ms. Madhu Sweta, Advocates for R-2/NHAI in all items. ........ RESPONDENTS APPEJAY HOUSE PVT. LTD. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ Petitioner HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Three identical writ petitions have been instituted by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking identical directions from this C...
pr.commissioner of Customs vs.n.v.vardarajulu
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 03, 2018 CUSAA1682018, C.M. Appl. No.30946-30947/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant COL. SANJEEV SETHI ..... Respondent CUSAA1692018, C.M. Appl. No.30948-30949/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS K.NARAYAN RAO versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent CUSAA1702018, C.M. Appl. No.30953-30954/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PREVENTIVE COMMISSIONERATE versus ..... Appellant K V K SESHAVATRAM, ..... Respondent CUSAA1712018, C.M. Appl. No.30955-30956/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant PVN VIJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent CUSAA1722018, C.M. Appl. No.30957-30958/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS M.SUDHAKAR RAO versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellant CUSAA1732018, C.M. Appl. No.30959-30960/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + N.V.VARDARAJULU CUSAA No.168 to 172/2018 Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Mr. Harpreet Singh, S...
Kaumesh Rana vs.the State Through Central Bureau of Investigation Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3906/2018 KAUMESH RANA ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE THORUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. M.P. Singh with Mr. K.K. Singh, Advocates. Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Mr. Philomon Kani, Ms. Kriti Handa, Ms. Hansika Sahu, Ms. Hansika Sahu, Ms. Damini K. & Mr. Ashray Behura, Advocates with SI Chetan Chauhan, CBI/SC-1/IO CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29281/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3906/2018 The petitioner impugns order dated 04.07.2018 whereby the bail 1. CRL.M.C. 3906/2018 Page 1 of 3 granted to the petitioner has been cancelled, personal bond as well as surety bond forfeited and non-bailable warrants along with warrants of attachment issued on failure of the petitio...
Avinash & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~10 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"3rd August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 3780/2015 and Crl.M.A.13378/2015 AVINASH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nisha Narayanan & Mr. Shariq Iqbal, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State With ASI Krishna, CAW Cell. Mr. Mohit Singh, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Allegations have been made against the petitioners in the case arising out of First Information Report (FIR) No.554/2013 of Police Station New Ashok Nagar involving offences punishable under Sections 498-A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). On conclusion of the investigation into the said FIR, a report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) was submitted on perusal of which the Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) took cognizance and issued processes against the petitioners by her order dated 21.03.2015.2. The petition ...