Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Planet Advertising Pvt Ltd vs.ambience Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~CP-23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CO.PET. 812/2015 Date of decision:03. 08.2018 PLANET ADVERTISING PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kunal Kalra and Mr.Ankur versus AMBIENCE PVT LTD & ANR. Aggarwal, Advs. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Nanda Devi and Mr.S.K.Jha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This petition is filed under section 433(e), 434 (a) read with section 1. 439(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking to wind up the respondent company. The petitioner submits that it was approached by the respondent company for displaying some of the outdoor advertisement. Purchase orders were placed by the respondent company on 10.6.2014. Between July, 2014 to November, 2014 the petitioner states that he has carried out work of the respondent company to its entire satisfaction and accordingly raised invoices for the work done. Despite completion of the work it is pleaded that payment of Rs.1,01,38,691/- has not been made.... Petitioner clai...
Turning Point & Anr. Vs.turning Point Institute Private Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h May, 2018. Pronounced on:2. d August, 2018 + FAO(OS) 263/2017 & CM Nos.35553-54/2017 TURNING POINT & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Manish Biala, Mr. Devesh Ratan and Mr. Ashutosh Upadhyaya, Advs. versus TURNING POINT INSTITUTE PRIVATE LTD Through : Mr. Ankit Kaushal and ..... Respondent Mr. Kunal Khanna, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This appeal, at the instance of M/s Turning Point (hereinafter referred to, for the sake of convenience, as the appellant) and its proprietor Mr. Keshav Kumar Agarwal, challenges an interlocutory order, dated 11th August, 2017, passed by the learned Single Judge, adjudicating IA162322015 in CS (OS) 2368/2015 and IA220812015 in CS (OS) 3159/2015. CS (OS) 2368/2015 was filed by M/s Turning Point Institute Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the respondent), against the appellant, whereas CS (O...
Vaibhav Aggarwal & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02.08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3626/2018 VAIBHAV AGGARWAL & ANR. STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr.Raju Bajaj, Adv Ms.Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State. Mr.Gaurav Kumar Singh, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.651/2008 under Sections 406/420/465/467/468/469/471/381/5at Police Station Malviya Nagar. After the filing of the chargesheet, the Trial Court in terms of order on charge dated 24.05.2017 has framed charge against the petitioner No.2 under Section 4of the IPC and the petitioner No.1 under Section 420/381/506-II/34 of the IPC.2.... Petitioner No.1 was an employee of respondent No.2 and the subject FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 CRL.M.C. 3626/2018 Page 1 of 3 alleging th...
Poonam vs.kishan Bahadoor & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 02, 2018 + MAC.APP. 88/2013 & CMs 1552-+ MAC.APP. 89/2013 & CMs 1555-+ MAC.APP. 90/2013 & CMs 1566-+ MAC.APP. 91/2013 & CMs 1569-POONAM RAJESH SANDEEP RAJESH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate 1. versus KISHAN BAHADOOR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Insurer JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 3rd November, 2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation to appellants/ Claimants/Injured persons-Poonam, Rajesh and Sandeep on account of injuries sustained by them and to appellants-Rajesh and Anr., on account of death of a housewife-Shanti, aged 27 years on the day of the accident, in a vehicular accident, which took place on 27th March, 2004.2. In the above-captioned four appeals, enhancement of compensation is sought by appellants-Claimants/Inj...
Devender Kaur vs.paujab and Sind Bank and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d August, 2018. + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 10522/2017 & CM No.43091/2017 DEVENDER KAUR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Mukesh Sharma with Mr.Manish, Advocates. versus PAUJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Seema Gupta, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Devinder Kaur has filed the present writ petition impugning order dated 23rd October, 2017 in Appeal No.336/2017 titled Smt.Devinder Kaur vs.Punjab & Sind Bank & Ors. passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ("Appellate Tribunal").2. Devinder Kaur ("petitioner") had filed SA No.28/2011 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal ("DRT") under Sub-Section (1) of Section 17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI W.P.(C )10522/2017 Page 1 of 5 Act), questioning and challenging initiation o...
Ajeet Kumar vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on -10.07.2018. Date of Decision-02.08.2018. + W.P.(C) 6865/2017 AJEET KUMAR Through Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J1 The petitioner, a Deputy Commandant in the Border Security Force, has preferred the present writ petition seeking quashing of the order dated 28.04.2017, whereby his representation to treat his tenure from 15.09.2011 to 25.11.2011 at the Frontiers Headquarters (Personnel Directorate), DG Secretariat and from 23.11.2011 to 01.04.2015 at the Frontier Headquarters (Provisional Directorate), New Delhi as mandatory field service, has been rejected and consequently, he has been declared ineligible for promotion to the rank of Second-In-Command (hereinafter referred to as "2IC") for the vacancy year 2016-20...
Kopastin Holdings Limited vs.uday Bahadur and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$-23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:02. h August, 2018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 39/2018 KOPASTIN HOLDINGS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jayant Mehta, Mr.Madhav Khosla, Advs. versus UDAY BAHADUR AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr.P.R.Rajhans, Mr.Neeraj Kapoor, Mr.Samaksh Goyal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.10172/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. IA No.10171/2018 For reasons stated in the application, the delay in refiling of the appeal is condoned. ARB.A. (COMM) 39/2018 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the order dated 22.01.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator dismissing the application filed by the appellant under Section 17 of the Act.2. The disputes between the parties have arisen in relation to the Joint ARB.A. (COMM) 39/2018 Page 1 Ventur...
Lalit Khanduja vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 928/2018 LALIT KHANDUJA STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Mehta, Advocate along with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks modification of order dated 22.01.2018 whereby the revision petition of the petitioner impugning order dated 07.10.2017 has been dismissed.2. The Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 07.10.2017, while permitting release of the subject vehicle directed the petitioner to deposit a Fixed Deposit Receipt in the sum of Rs.10 lacs in the name of the court as the vehicle was not insured.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said direction was issued so as to secure the interest of the injured/legal heirs of the decea...
Ram Dass vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 572/2018 & Crl.M (Bail) 827/2018 Through: Mr. Sumit Chaudhary, Advocate (DHCLSC) ..... Appellant versus RAM DASS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL STATE Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP ..... Respondent for State % JUDGMENT0208.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 5th March 2018 in SC No.109/2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, North West, Rohini Courts whereby the Appellant has been convicted under Section 6 read with Section 5 (m) and (n) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 (POCSO Act). Since the Appellant has been convicted under the aforementioned provisions of the law, no separate conviction was recorded under Sections 376 (2) (i) and (f) IPC with which he was also charged. The appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 7th March 2018 whereby he has been sentenced to imprisonment for life along with fine of ...
A.s Gupta (Since Deceased Thr His Lrs) vs.g.d Sharma (Deceased Through ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d August, 2018. RSA1902017 A.S GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED THR HIS LRS) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Irfan Ahmed, Adv. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS G.D SHARMA (DECEASED THROUGH LR) & ORS Through: None for R-1. Mr. Sahil Dagar, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Jaideep Malik, ASC for SDMC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kamal Sorout & Ms. Mrinalini Sharma, Advs. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the CPC impugns the judgment and decree (dated 17th January, 2017 in RCA SCJ57362016 of the Court of Senior Civil Judge (South)) of dismissal of first appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant/defendant against the judgment and decree (dated 5th March, 2015 in Suit No.437/2014 (Unique ID No.02401C0201802003) of the Court of Civil Judge (West)) of permanent injunction in a suit filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff against the appellant/defendant and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- Next ›
- Last »