Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Asadullah Akhtar vs.govt. Of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:3. d August, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 2306/2018 ASADULLAH AKHTAR Represented by: Mr.Shariq Iqbal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Babbar, Advocate for Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with SI Alok, PS Special Cell CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.29231/2018 Allowed subject to just exceptions. Crl.M.A.No.29232/2018 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 30 days in re-filing the petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. W.P.(Crl.) No.2306/2018 1. By this petition, the petitioner who is involved in six FIRs wherein in one FIR, charge sheet has been filed by the National Investigating Agency and in the others, charge sheets have been filed by the local Police claims that the petitioner is suffering from a genetic disorder including asthma, atopic dermatitis of both upper and lower limbs, seborrhoeic dermatitis ...
pr.commissioner of Customs vs.pvn Vijay Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 03, 2018 CUSAA1682018, C.M. Appl. No.30946-30947/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant COL. SANJEEV SETHI ..... Respondent CUSAA1692018, C.M. Appl. No.30948-30949/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS K.NARAYAN RAO versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent CUSAA1702018, C.M. Appl. No.30953-30954/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PREVENTIVE COMMISSIONERATE versus ..... Appellant K V K SESHAVATRAM, ..... Respondent CUSAA1712018, C.M. Appl. No.30955-30956/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant PVN VIJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent CUSAA1722018, C.M. Appl. No.30957-30958/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS M.SUDHAKAR RAO versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellant CUSAA1732018, C.M. Appl. No.30959-30960/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + N.V.VARDARAJULU CUSAA No.168 to 172/2018 Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Mr. Harpreet Singh, S...
Ratnesh Pandey vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RATNESH PANDEY CRL.M.C. 3902/2018 ........ Petitioner Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocate. For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State Mr. Sumit Misra, Advocate for respondent No.2 JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 29272/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exception. CRL.M.C.3902/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.75/2014 under SectionsIPC, Police Station Mandawali and the consequent CRL.M.C. 3902/2018 Page 1 of 3 proceedings arising therefrom, based on a settlement.2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to an accident which took place between the vehicle of the petitioner and the respondent No.2. The complainant sustained injuries in his leg. The leg of the complainant has subsequently been am...
Ekta Yadav & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~27 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. d August, 2018 LPA4252018 EKTA YADAV & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Grover, Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Mr. Tarang Agarwal & Mr. Anant Gautam, Advocates Ms. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Kushal Kumar, Mr. Harsh Ahuja & Mr. Vibhu Tripathy, Advocates for UOI Mr. Hemant Phelphn & Mr. Varsh Manchanda, Advocates for respondent No.3 Mr. Ajit Warrier & Mr. Aditya Nayyar, for respondent No.4 Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): CM Nos.31107-08/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. LPA No.425/2018 Page 1 of 14 LPA No.425/2018, CAV No.703/2018& CM No.31106/2018 Ekta Yadav and Shaila Charles have filed the present intra court appeal under Clause-X of the Letters Patent, impugning the order dated 2.8.2018, ...
pr.commissioner of Customs vs.k.narayan Rao
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 03, 2018 CUSAA1682018, C.M. Appl. No.30946-30947/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant COL. SANJEEV SETHI ..... Respondent CUSAA1692018, C.M. Appl. No.30948-30949/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS K.NARAYAN RAO versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent CUSAA1702018, C.M. Appl. No.30953-30954/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PREVENTIVE COMMISSIONERATE versus ..... Appellant K V K SESHAVATRAM, ..... Respondent CUSAA1712018, C.M. Appl. No.30955-30956/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant PVN VIJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent CUSAA1722018, C.M. Appl. No.30957-30958/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS M.SUDHAKAR RAO versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellant CUSAA1732018, C.M. Appl. No.30959-30960/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + N.V.VARDARAJULU CUSAA No.168 to 172/2018 Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Mr. Harpreet Singh, S...
Ram Rich Pal Sharma & Ors vs.bhushan Lal Sahni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d August, 2018 RSA3432015, CM No.5075/2016 (u/O41 R.22 of CPC), CM No.5076/2016 (for stay) RAM RICH PAL SHARMA & ORS Through: Mr.Ashok Gurnani, Advocate .... Appellants versus Through: Mr.Anurag Lakhotia, Advocate BHUSHAN LAL SAHNI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the CPC is .... Respondent preferred against the judgment and decree [dated 17th January, 2015 in RCA No.82/2013 (Unique ID No.02402C0163782012) of the Court of Additional District Judge, Shahdara]. in First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the respondent against the judgment and decree [dated 2nd May, 2012 in Civil Suit No.860/2006 (Unique Case ID No.02402C0000431988) of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, North East)]. in a suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs against the respondent/defendant.2. The Regular Second Appeal came up first before this Court on 18th September, 2015, when w...
Vijay @ Vijay Bahadur & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3889/2018 VIJAY @ VIJAY BAHADUR & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Ms. Alpha M. Prasad, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SI Parmod Kumar, PS Vasant Kunj Respondent No.2 in person. JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29239/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3889/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.200/2009 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Vasant Kunj, based on a CRL.M.C. 3889/2018 Page 1 of 3 settlement.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.3. Learned counsel...
Dinesh Kumar & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DINESH KUMAR & ORS CRL.M.C. 1571/2018 Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 ........ Petitioners STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Fidel Sebastian, Advocate Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Manoj Chahar, PS Paschim Vihar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.179/2016 under Sections 406/420/468/4IPC Police Station Paschim Vihar. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of the Manager of M/s Paschim Gas Service contending that the petitioners had been engaged as delivery boys for delivery of gas cylinders but on complaints of short delivery, wrongful delivery and mis-delivery etc., their services CRL.M.C. 1571/2018 Page 1 of 3 were terminated. Thereafter the petitioners are alleged to have made false complaint with ...
Rimjhim vs.food Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~32 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3832018 RIMJHIM Date of Judgment:3. d August, 2018 Through: Mr.Ravindra Raizada, Sr.Adv. with ..... Appellant Ms.Archana Pathak Dave, Ms.Ankita Chaudhary and Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocates. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Rishi K.Awasthi, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of parties, the present appeal is taken up for final hearing and disposal.2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 03.05.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court.3. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this appeal are that the respondent had published an advertisement inviting candidates for the post of Assistant Grade-II (Hindi) on 14.02.2015. The appellant claimed to be fully eligible and qualified for the said post had applied on 16.03.2015. Her application...
Premwati vs.the Commissioner, South Municipal Corporation of Delhi & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
#45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8035/2018 PREMWATI ........ Petitioner versus THE COMMISSIONER, SOUTH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel along with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate. and Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advocates for SDMC/respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prays as follows:-"Issue appropriate writ, order or direction thereby a) the respondent No.1 to 4 to demolish the direct illegal/unauthorized existing structure of Flat bearing No.53/1239, First Floor, DDA Flats, Kalkaji New Delhi and Flat No.53/1243 to 1247, II Floor to Vth Floor, DDA Flats, Kalkaji, New Delhi. b) Direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- Next ›
- Last »