Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Om Prakash Pandey vs.ram Prakash Pandey
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h August, 2018. RSA1112018 OM PRAKASH PANDEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Mishra, Mr. T.D. Shukla and Mr. G.S. Tiwari, Advs. ..... Respondent Versus RAM PRAKASH PANDEY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.31365/2018 (for exemption) Through: None.1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. RSA1112018 3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree (dated 3rd May, 2018 in RCA No.11/2016 (New RCADJ No.61819/2016) of the Court of Additional District Judge-12 (Central)) of dismissal of first appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the judgment and decree (dated 5th September, 2012 in Suit No.1616/2006 (Unique ID No.02401C0885912006) of the Court of Civil Judge-01 (North)) of dismissal of suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for (i) declaration of his exclusive o...
Hindustan Vidyut Products Ltd. Vs.delhi Power Company Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision : August 06, 2018 FAO (OS) 337/2007 HINDUSTAN VIDYUT PRODUCTS LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. B. Mohan and Mr. Siddharth versus Aggarwal, Advs. DELHI POWER COMPANY LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS and Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Advs. with Mr.Gaurav Gupta, GM (Legal) for R-1. Through Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat FAO (OS) 338/2007 HINDUSTAN VIDYUT PRODUCTS LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. B. Mohan and Mr. Siddharth versus Aggarwal, Advs. DELHI TRANSCO LTD. & ANR. Through Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat ........ RESPONDENTS and Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Advs. with Mr.Gaurav Gupta, GM (Legal) for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.Both the appeals in hand, preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'), FAO (OS) 3& 3Page 1 of 21 extend challenge to the judgment dated 25.07.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the two petitions bei...
Surjan Sarkar vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
#55 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8127/2018 SURJAN SARKAR ........ Petitioner versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, Advocates : Mr. G.D. Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"In the facts and circumstances of the present case this Honble Court may pleased to: W.P.(C) 8127/2018 Page 1 of 3 a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the respondent i.e. premises bearing H.No.C-7, New Ashok Nagar Ext., Delhi-110092. in fav...
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.satya Prakash Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO3132018 Judgment reserved on :31. t July, 2018 Date of decision:6. h August, 2018 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED ..... Appellant. Through: Mr. Puneet Bhalla, Advocate Versus SATYA PRAKASH CHAUDHARY .. Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant assails the impugned order dated 30.05.2018 of the learned Trial Court in CS No.18whereby on a suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery along with an application Under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for appointment of a receiver to take over the possession of the vehicle, i.e., car make SWIFT DZIRE/VDI bearing registration No.UP-16BA-1465, the learned Trial Court directed the issuance of the summons for settlement of issues along with the notice of the said application to the defendant returnable for 9.10.2018.2. The prayer made by the appellant herein as plaintiff to the said suit seeking appointment of...
Amitabh Bhasin vs.hemlata Bhasin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h August, 2018 CM(M) 883/2018 & CMs No.31126/2018 31127/2018 (for condonation of 49 days delay in re-filing) (for stay) & AMITABH BHASIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Mudgal, Adv. Versus HEMLATA BHASIN CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: None. ..... Respondent This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns as many as three orders, in HMA No.206/(New No.61747/2016) of the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court (Central).2. The first order under challenge is the order dated 12th October, 2010 allowing the application of the respondent/wife under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for enhancement of maintenance of two minor children of the parties from Rs.12,000/- per month to Rs.18,000/- per month.3. The second order is the order dated 20th January, 2018 of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner/husband for review of the order dated 12th October, 2010 ...
Darshan Lal vs.amit Dhigani & Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.202/2017 and C.M. No.6560/2017(stay) 6th August, 2018 Appellant in person. ..... Appellant + % DARSHAN LAL Through: versus AMIT DHIGANI & ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for with respondent respondent no.1 in person. no.1 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 21.10.2006 by which trial court has decreed the suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff with respect to the suit property being one shop bearing no.488/12/13-B situated at R Block Market, RFA No.202/2017 Page 1 of 6 Dilshad Garden, Delhi-95 shown in red colour in the site plan Ex.PW1/1.The following is the relief/operative para of the impugned judgment dated 21.10.2006:-"R...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.raj Rani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 06, 2018 + MAC.APP. 661/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus RAJ RANI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Panwar & Mr. Rajinder Juneja, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. R.S. Lathwal, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Panwar & Mr. Rajinder Juneja, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. R.S. Lathwal, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 + MAC.APP. 662/2015 MANISH & ORS. Versus + MAC.APP. 663/2015 RAJ RANI & ORS. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS MAC. APP. 661/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. Anil Panwar & Mr. Rajinder Juneja, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 4 Mr. R.S. Lathwal, Advocate for respondents No.5 & 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) ...
s.k. Miglani vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
$~13 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 572/2015 Decided on:06. h August, 2018 S.K. MIGLANI STATE Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Sharma, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Madhurendra Kumar, PS EOW ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The name of the petitioner (a bank employee) figured in the investigation into first information report (no.432/2000) of police station Kotla Mubarakpur for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 201, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The police, upon completion of the investigation, submitted report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC), inter alia, seeking his prosecution, the gravamen of the accusations (charge) primarily being that he had authorized the opening of a fictitious saving bank account in connivance with the co- accused Praveen Kumar Arora, to facilitate encashment of a cheque amountin...
Arijit Haldar vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
#53 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8060/2018 ARIJIT HALDAR ........ Petitioner versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, Advocates : Mr. G.D. Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"In the facts and circumstances of the present case this Honble Court may pleased to: W.P.(C) 8060/2018 Page 1 of 3 a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the respondent i.e. premises bearing H.No.202, Basement, New Ashok Nagar, Delhi-110096. i...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-04-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :27. h July, 2018 Date of decision :4. h August , 2018 CRL.REF.No.2/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishanan, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Trideep Pais, Adv. (Amici Curiae) with Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri and Mr. Pranav Jain, Ms. Manvi Priya and Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for STATE the State. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The following reference dated 6th October, 2016 has been received from Shri Vishal Singh, Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board-I, Sewa Kutir Complex, Kingsway Camp, Delhi. Criminal Reference No.2 of 2016 Page 1 of 40 Inasmuch as the issues which require to be considered are succinctly set out therein, we extract the reference made by the ld. Judge under Section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in extenso whic...