Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
pr.commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs.sinosteel India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.825/2018 Date of decision:3. d August, 2018. PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel Income Tax Department. for versus SINOSTEEL INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Present appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act, for short) in the case of M/s Sinosteel India Limited (respondent-assessee, for short) impugns the order dated 29th January, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) deleting penalty for concealment of income under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The appeal relates to Assessment Year 2006-07.2. Penalty for concealment was imposed for failure to correctly compute arms length price of international transactions between the respondent-assessee and its holding company M/s Sino Steel Co...
pr.commissioner of Customs vs.col. Sanjeev Sethi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~39, 40, 41, 46, 47, 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 03, 2018 CUSAA1682018, C.M. Appl. No.30946-30947/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant COL. SANJEEV SETHI ..... Respondent CUSAA1692018, C.M. Appl. No.30948-30949/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS K.NARAYAN RAO versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent CUSAA1702018, C.M. Appl. No.30953-30954/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PREVENTIVE COMMISSIONERATE versus ..... Appellant K V K SESHAVATRAM, ..... Respondent CUSAA1712018, C.M. Appl. No.30955-30956/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant PVN VIJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent CUSAA1722018, C.M. Appl. No.30957-30958/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS M.SUDHAKAR RAO versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellant CUSAA1732018, C.M. Appl. No.30959-30960/2018 PR.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + N.V.VARDARAJULU CUSAA No.168 to 172/2018 Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Mr. Harpreet Singh, S...
Harmandeep Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3885/2018 HARMANDEEP SINGH STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. Nitish Kumar, Advocate. For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for R-2 JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29236/2018 (condonation of delay in re-filing) For the reason stated in the application, the delay of 26 days in re-filing is condoned. The application is allowed. CRL.M.C. 3885/2018 The petitioner seeks quashing of the proceedings emanating 1. CRL.M.C. 3885/2018 Page 1 of 3 from complaint case CC No.32/1/2014 Police Station Paschim Vihar under Sections 323/341/452/506(ii) IPC as also the summoning order dated 22.02.2016.2. Parties are related to each other. The petitioner No.1 is the son of the brother of the husband of the complainant. Subje...
Pankaj Uppal vs.anjali Uppal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 08.2018 CRL.REV.P.119/2018 & CRL.M.A.2606/2019 & CRL.M.A. 3707/2018 PANKAJ UPPAL versus ANJALI UPPAL & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Lalit Yadav with Mr. Vinay Chaddha, : Mr. Ram Bir Nahar, Advocate Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 14.12.2017 of the family court whereby the application filed by Respondent No.1 under section 125 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been allowed.2. Parties were referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. Parties have settled their disputes. Mediation settlement agreement dated 18.07.2018 (also bearing the date 20.07.2018) has been executed between the parties. CRL.REV.P. 119/2018 Page 1 of 3 2.... Petitioner as well as respondent No.1 are present in court...
Reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd vs.anita & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d August, 2018 $~24 * % + MAC.APP. 400/2018 & CM APPL. 16320/2018 RELIANCE GEN INS CO LTD Through: Mr.Arihant ..... Appellant Jain, Advocate for Mr.S.D.Raman, Advocate versus ANITA & ORS Through: Mr.S.N. Parashar, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS to R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.29,56,000/- has been awarded to respondent No.1 to 4. The appellant is seeking reduction of the award amount.2. The accident dated 08th April, 2009 resulted in the death of Chitra Pal Singh. The deceased was aged 49 years and was working with Delhi Police as Head Constable and was drawing a salary of Rs.18,968/-. The deceased was survived by two sons and a daughter who claimed compensation.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.18,968/- per month, added 30% towards future prospects, deducted 1/4th towards perso...
Appejay House Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~51, 52 & 53 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:3. d August, 2018 versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS STEELCRETE PRIVATE LIMITED UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus APEEJAY PRIVATE LIMITED UNION OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 9988/2015 + W.P.(C) 10285/2015 + W.P.(C) 9992/2015 Present : Mr. Randhir Jain and Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advocates for CORAM: petitioners in all items. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC alongwith Mr. Gopal Banik, DEO, LAC (South-East) in all items. Mr. Rohit Jain & Ms. Madhu Sweta, Advocates for R-2/NHAI in all items. ........ RESPONDENTS APPEJAY HOUSE PVT. LTD. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ Petitioner HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Three identical writ petitions have been instituted by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking identical directions from this C...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :1. t August, 2018 Date of decision :3. d August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12326/2015 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through: Court on its own motion. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ..... Respondent Addl. Standing Counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Suo motu cognizance was taken by this court on the basis of 1. a news report in the Hindustan Times dated 22nd December, 2015 regarding the death of an 11 year old boy, who had gone on a school picnic, after falling into an uncovered rain water harvesting pit at the Millennium Park in Southeast Delhi.2. The report titled as Boy on school picnic falls in water harvesting pit, dies" reads as follows:-"NEW DELHI : An 11 year old boy who had gone for a WP(C) No.12326/2015 Page 1 of 46 school picnic, died after falling inside a water harvestin...
Mange Ram vs.raj Kumar Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MANGE RAM RFA No.623/2018 3rd August, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Advocate with appellant in person. RAJ KUMAR YADAV versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.30905/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.623/2018 & CM No.30904/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit RFA No.623/2018 Page 1 of 6 impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 7.6.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant and decreed the suit for a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- along with interest, on account of two cheques given by the appellant/defendant to the respondent/plaintiff having been dishonoured.2. The facts of the case are th...
National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Intercontinental Consultan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 08.2018 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 162/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Ms. Soumya Priyadarshini, Advocates. versus M/S INTERCONTINENTAL CONSULTANT AND TECHNOCRATS PVT LTD Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with ..... Respondent Mr.Siddharth Vaid, Mr. Sarthak Katyal and Mr. Jaideep Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % CAV6932018 Since the counsel for the caveator has put in appearance the caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 30587/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) (COMM) 162/2018 & CM APPL. 30586/2018 (for stay) The appellant-National Highways Authority of India (hereinafter NHAI) is aggrieved by a judgment and order of the FAO(OS) (COMM) 162/2018 Page 1 of 7 learned Single Judge rejecting its petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and ...
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Isbt Kashmiri Gate Delhi vs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d August, 2018 $~22 * % + MAC.APP. 356/2018 RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ISBT KASHMIRI GATE DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, Advocate versus YOGITA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga with Mr. Mohit and Mr. Vinay Goel, Ahuja Advocates for respondents No.1 to 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.39,53,000/- has been awarded to the claimants. The appellant is seeking reduction of the award amount. The accident dated 25th September, 2015 resulted in the death of Amit Manchanda. The deceased was aged about 33 years at the time of accident and was survived by his widow, one minor daughter, one minor son and parents who claimed compensation.2. The deceased was working as an Assistant Manager with Asian Institute of Medical Science and the Claims Tribunal took the income ...
- ‹ Prev
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- Next ›
- Last »