Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Star India Pvt Ltd vs.state Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~10 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"2nd August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 4559/2015 and Crl.M.A.16253/2015 STAR INDIA PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddarth Luthra, Senior Advocate Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Ravi Sharma, Mr. Mayank Datta, Ms. Pallavi Garg, Mr. Ayush Jain, Mr. Nitain Sharma, & Mr. Dhavish Chitkara, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State with SI Pravin Kumar, DIU/SED Mr. Vikki Choudhary, respondent in person. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The petitioner herein had approached the court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) with a criminal complaint invoking the provision contained in Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C.) on 06.07.2015 seeking a direction to the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), Crime Branch, of Delhi Police, to investigate into certain acts of commission and omission allegedly const...
Sanjay vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1144/2018 SANJAY versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Rai, Advocate Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State. JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.08/2018 under Section 498A/304B/34 IPC, Police Station Sarita Vihar.... Petitioner is the brother of the husband of the deceased.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and that the allegations do not substantiate any harassment or abetment to suicide on the part of the petitioner.3.... Petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated 22.05.2018. Learned APP informs that petitioner did join BAIL APPLN. 1144/2018 Page 1 of 2 investigation. She submits that investigation has bee...
Mr. Apar Chopra vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~54 & 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02.08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3795/2018 MR. KARAN MEHTA & ORS. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. + CRL.M.C. 3787/2018 MR.APAR CHOPRA versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : for petitioner Mr.Rajiv Khosla and Mr.Vinit Trehan, Advs in Crl.M.C.3795/2018. Mr.Aditya Trehan, Adv. Crl.M.C.3787/2018. Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Yogesh Kumar, P.S.Kirti Nagar in Crl.M.C.3795/2018 and ASI Harish Chander, P.S.Kirti Nagar in Crl.M.C.3787/2018. Mr.Rajiv Khosla and Mr.Vinit Trehan, Advs in Crl.M.C.3787/2018. in For the Respondent(s): CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM Appl.28957/2018 (exemption) CM Appl.28937/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3795/2018 & 3787/2018 Page 1 ...
Rajesh & Anr. Vs.kishan Bahadoor & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 02, 2018 + MAC.APP. 88/2013 & CMs 1552-+ MAC.APP. 89/2013 & CMs 1555-+ MAC.APP. 90/2013 & CMs 1566-+ MAC.APP. 91/2013 & CMs 1569-POONAM RAJESH SANDEEP RAJESH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate 1. versus KISHAN BAHADOOR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Insurer JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 3rd November, 2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation to appellants/ Claimants/Injured persons-Poonam, Rajesh and Sandeep on account of injuries sustained by them and to appellants-Rajesh and Anr., on account of death of a housewife-Shanti, aged 27 years on the day of the accident, in a vehicular accident, which took place on 27th March, 2004.2. In the above-captioned four appeals, enhancement of compensation is sought by appellants-Claimants/Inj...
M/S Alfa Packers and Movers vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8067/2018 & CM Nos.30906-30907/2018 M/S ALFA PACKERS AND MOVERS ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Abhijat and Mr. Shashwat Jindal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Bibhash Kumar, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0208.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition praying as under:-"(a) By the issuance of an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, direct the Respondent to grant to the... Petitioner, the extension of the Agreement dated 28.09.2017 by another 1 (One) Year as provided in Clause 1 of the said Agreement. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent denying the extension of the contract awarded to the petitioner for lifting, W.P.(C) 8067/2018 Page 1 of 6 transporting, packing, forwarding and dispatching/delivery of Weekly News Journals Employment News and Rozgar Samachar in English, Hindi and Urdu all o...
Ravinder vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 08.2018 CRL.REV.P. 578/2018 RAVINDER STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate. : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 637/2018 & CRL.M.A.12373/2018 (stay) & Crl. M. (Bail) 1098/2018 1. The petitioner impugns order on conviction dated 26.04.2018 and order on sentence dated 04.05.2018 passed by the trial court as also the order dated 31.05.2018 of the appellate court rejecting the appeal of the petitioner.2. The petitioner was convicted of the offence punishable under CRL.REV.P. 578-2018 Page 1 of 3 Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The subject cheque was of Rs. 3,70,000/-. The petitioner was sentenced to under simple imprisonment for a period of one month as also to pay a...
Reserve Bank of India vs.ms Jvg Finance Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~CP-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:02. 08.2018 + CO.PET. 265/1998 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Manisha Singh, Ms.Swati Setia and Mr.Gautam Kumar, Adsv. For RBI MS JVG FINANCE LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through Ms.Aneeta Sharma, AR of the Ex. Directors Mr.Anvi Aggarwal, Adv. for UOI Mr.Aman Vaccher Mr.Ashutosh Dubey, Mr.Abhishek Chadha and Mr.Arun Nagar, Advs. for Hyderabad Mr.Harsh Ahuja and Mr.Kunal Kumar, Advs. for applicants in CA233234/2012 Mr.Kunal Sharma, Adv. for the OL Mr.Aman Nandrajog and Mr.Arjun Nanda, Advs. for Manasvi Security Services CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH , J.(ORAL) CA20802014 1. This application is filed by Mrs.G.Bharathi Devi seeking a direction to the OL to hand over possession of the plot No.E-313, measuring 300 sq.yds. in the survey No.94, 96 and 97 situated at Kondhapur village, Hyderabad. It has been pleaded that the applicant is a bona fide purchaser for value and is registe...
S. Manpreet Singh vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3852/2018 S. MANPREET SINGH versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Kulbhushan Mehta, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State. Respondent No.2 in person. JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29120/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3852/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.112 of 2018 under Sections 498A/323/506 of the IPC at Police Station Mahender Park, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes. It is further submitted on behalf of the parties that parties had entered into the settlement vide Memorandum of CRL.M....
Ramod Kumar Thakur vs.shamshad & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 02, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1072/2017 1. RAMOD KUMAR THAKUR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Sarin, Advocate Versus SHAMSHAD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ridhima Gaur, Advocate for Ms.Archna Gaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 9th August, 2017 grants compensation of `7,23,300/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to appellant-Injured, aged 44 years, on account of grievous injury suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 19th June, 2013 . The facts, as noticed in the impugned Award, are as under:-"By this order I shall dispose of the claim petition filed by the petitioner for the injuries sustained by him in a road accident on 19.06.2013 at about 9.30AM at road near Botanical Garden Metro Station within the jurisdiction of police station Section-39, Noida, U.P. due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle No.UP16AM2428by respondent no.1, owned by respond...
Punjab National Bank vs.prime Engineers and Consultants
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 02, 2018 + FAO(OS) 233/2013, C.M. Appl. No.7339/2018 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK versus PRIME ENGINEERS CONSULTANTS + FAO(OS) 234/2013 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK versus PRIME ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent: Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Ms. Nikita Salwan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA % ORDER S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. In both these appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred as the Act), the Punjab National Bank (hereinafter referred as PNB) questions the decision of the learned Single Judge/adjudicating its objections to two separate FAO (OS) No.233/2013 & 234/2013 Page 1 of 23 awards, rendered by one common Tribunal. The Tribunal adjudicated the disputes with respect to two works contracts awar...