Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cheil India Private Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~19 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d August, 2018. + ITA3112017 CHEIL INDIA PRIVATE LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Salil Kapoor with Mr.Sumit Lalchandani and Ms.A.Kapoor, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Deepak Anand, Jr.Standing Counsel. ITA7082017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Deepak Anand, Jr.Standing Counsel. versus M/S CHEIL INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Salil Kapoor with Mr.Sumit Lalchandani and Ms.A.Kapoor, Advocates. + ITA Nos.3& 7Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Present appeal by Cheil India Private Limited under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961("Act" for short) relates to the assessment year 2011-12. It impugns the order dated 9th December, 2016 of the Income T...
Pushpa Devi vs.the State (govt.of Nct Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
% + PUSHPA DEVI BAIL APPLN. 1714/2018 THE STATE (GOVT.OF NCT DELHI) versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent $~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:02. 08.2018 Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.198/2018 under Sections under Section 3 of Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act; Section 75 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act; under Section 16 of Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, District West Delhi, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar, New Delhi.2. The allegations in the subject FIR are that a rescue operation BAIL APPLN. 1714/2018 Page 1 of 3 was conducted at the house of the co-accused where a minor girl child aged about 8 to 9 years was found employed.3. It is co...
Vijay Kumar vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3845/2018 Judgment delivered on:02. 08.2018 VIJAY KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Ranjit Singh, Adv. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with Insp.Ram Niwas, P.S.Sarita Vihar. Mr.Raghav Chadha, Adv. for R-2 along with Mr.Pradeep Baisoya, AR for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 29105/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3845/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.389 of 2015 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, based on a settlement. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner 2. CRL.M.C. 3845/2018 Page 1 of 3 has been admitted to Kalra Hospital SRCNC on 30.07.2018 on account of an emergency complaint...
Vijay @ Rinku vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.A.No.1341/2012 Judgment reserved on :1. t August, 2018 Date of decision :2. d August, 2018 VIJAY @ RINKU STATE Through: Mr. Anupam Sharma, Mr. Shivam ........ Petitioner Gupta, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Additional ..... Respondent Public Prosecutor for State. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JUSTICE MS. ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of the Criminal Appeal filed by the appellant Vijay @ Rinku i.e. the appellant herein S/o Sh. Harshwardhan assailing the impugned judgment dated 16.07.2012 and impugned order on sentence dated 20.07.2012 passed by the District Judge Incharge/ Additional Sessions Judge, District Courts, Rohini in Sessions Case No.114/2010 arising out of FIR No.532/2007, registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 364/392/302/201/411/120B/202/216 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter Crl.A.1341/2012 Page 1 of 89 referred to as IPC) whereby the ap...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.pammi Nagi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 02, 2018 + MAC.APP. 235/2013 1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate .....Appellant versus PAMMI NAGI & ORS. Through: Mr. Ranbir Singh, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned Award of 27th November, 2012 grants compensation of `35,90,900/- on account of death of one Rakesh aged 49 years in a vehicular accident. The facts, as noticed in the impugned Award, are as under: - Brief facts as narrated in petition in nutshell are that on 22.02.2010 at about 11.45 p.m the victim was travelling along with respondent No.1 as a pillion rider on a motorcycle bearing registration no DL-8SAQ-4989 and when they reached in front of Shanti Bhawan, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi, the respondent No.1 hit the motorcycle against the divider consequently causing fatal injuries to Sh Rakesh Nagi (victim/pillion rider). The claim of the claimants is that the alleged accid...
Punjab National Bank vs.prime Engineers Consultants
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 02, 2018 + FAO(OS) 233/2013, C.M. Appl. No.7339/2018 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK versus PRIME ENGINEERS CONSULTANTS + FAO(OS) 234/2013 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK versus PRIME ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent: Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Ms. Nikita Salwan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA % ORDER S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. In both these appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred as the Act), the Punjab National Bank (hereinafter referred as PNB) questions the decision of the learned Single Judge/adjudicating its objections to two separate FAO (OS) No.233/2013 & 234/2013 Page 1 of 23 awards, rendered by one common Tribunal. The Tribunal adjudicated the disputes with respect to two works contracts awar...
Mr. Karan Mehta & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
$~54 & 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02.08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3795/2018 MR. KARAN MEHTA & ORS. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. + CRL.M.C. 3787/2018 MR.APAR CHOPRA versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : for petitioner Mr.Rajiv Khosla and Mr.Vinit Trehan, Advs in Crl.M.C.3795/2018. Mr.Aditya Trehan, Adv. Crl.M.C.3787/2018. Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Yogesh Kumar, P.S.Kirti Nagar in Crl.M.C.3795/2018 and ASI Harish Chander, P.S.Kirti Nagar in Crl.M.C.3787/2018. Mr.Rajiv Khosla and Mr.Vinit Trehan, Advs in Crl.M.C.3787/2018. in For the Respondent(s): CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0208.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM Appl.28957/2018 (exemption) CM Appl.28937/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3795/2018 & 3787/2018 Page 1 ...
Smt. Chand Kaur vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:02. 08.2018 20.3.2018 * + W.P. (C) 9391/2017 1. SMT. CHAND KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ranbir Yadav, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Jitendra Kr. Tripathi, Govt. Pleader and Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocate. Ms. Akshara Chauhan, proxy for Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General for the State of Haryana. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Prefatory Facts: This is a writ petition whereby, challenge is laid to the order dated 17.9.2010, passed by respondent No.1 & 2. In effect, by this order, the petitioners plea for grant of pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 (hereafter referred to as the 1980 Scheme) has been rejected, inter alia, on the ground that the petitioners husband, Late Sultan Singh neither met the eligibility criteria nor the evidentiary requirements ...
Sandeep vs.kishan Bahadoor & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 02, 2018 + MAC.APP. 88/2013 & CMs 1552-+ MAC.APP. 89/2013 & CMs 1555-+ MAC.APP. 90/2013 & CMs 1566-+ MAC.APP. 91/2013 & CMs 1569-POONAM RAJESH SANDEEP RAJESH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate 1. versus KISHAN BAHADOOR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Insurer JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 3rd November, 2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation to appellants/ Claimants/Injured persons-Poonam, Rajesh and Sandeep on account of injuries sustained by them and to appellants-Rajesh and Anr., on account of death of a housewife-Shanti, aged 27 years on the day of the accident, in a vehicular accident, which took place on 27th March, 2004.2. In the above-captioned four appeals, enhancement of compensation is sought by appellants-Claimants/Inj...
Bhupinder Singh vs.housing Development Financing Corporation Limited & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-02-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.373/2018 and C.M. No.18205/2018(stay) + % BHUPINDER SINGH2d August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bharat Deepak, Advocate with Ms. Vandana S. Bhandari, Advocate. versus HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCING CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. Through: Mr. Ajay Saroya, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS Respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 23.1.2018 by which trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant No.1 and has decreed the suit for recovery of RFA No.373/2018 Page 1 of 23 moneys filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff for a sum of Rs.20,26,108/-.2. A reading of the plaint shows that the suit is not based on a dishonoured cheque or a written ...