Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dans Energy pvt.ltd vs.ge Power India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 264/2018 & IA No.8453/2018 Reserved on:6. h July, 2018 Date of decision :6. h August, 2018 DANS ENERGY PVT.LTD Through: Mr.Gajendra ........ Petitioner Maheshwari, Ms.Prerna Chopra, Advs. versus GE POWER INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Anish Kapur,Ms.Divya Bhalla, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA Mr.Dhritiman Roy, Advs.1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 30.04.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three Arbitrators adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Contract dated 07.08.2009 executed between the parties, whereunder the respondent was to supply plants, Equipments and Mandatory Spares from abroad on CIF- India Port of Entry basis and from Ex-works (India) basis for Electro- Mechanical Package of Jorethang Loo...
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.bhajan Lal Solankiya & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO3162018 Judgment reserved on :31. t July, 2018 Date of decision :6. h August, 2018 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED ..... Appellant. Through: Mr. Puneet Bhalla, Advocate Versus BHAJAN LAL SOLANKIYA & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant assails the impugned order dated 6.6.2018 of the learned Trial Court in CS No.18whereby on a suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery along with an application Under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for appointment of a receiver to take over the possession of the vehicle, i.e., car make MARUTI SWIFT DZIRE/VDI bearing registration No.DL-5CL-0177, the learned Trial Court directed the issuance of the summons for settlement of issues along with the notice of the said application to the defendant returnable for 8.10.2018.2. The prayer made by the appellant herein as plaintiff to the said suit seeking ...
M/S. Teleecare Network (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 7853/2017 M/S. TELEECARE NETWORK (INDIA) PVT. LTD.Petitioner Through: Sh. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Pariar, Ms. Asha Madan and Sh. Mukesh Jain, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...Respondents Through: Sh. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Sh. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This Court had on 30.07.2018 allowed the writ petition and made the following order: = Matter is remanded back. The petitioners claim that the limitation will not be bar has to be held. The impugned order is hereby quashed. The refund application moved by the petitioner shall be decided on its merit, within ten weeks, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of. 2. The reasons for making the order were not discussed. However, in the meanwhile, the order itself was issued inadvertently to the parties. In th...
Mst. Akshaj Ojha (Through Guardian) vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
#50 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 7504/2018 MST. AKSHAJ OJHA (THROUGH GUARDIAN) ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Mr. Yugans and Mr. Amit Prakash Shahi, Advocates : Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for R-1 & R-3 Ms. Vasudha Bajaj and Mr. Ankur Goel, Advocates for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM APPL.28697/2018 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of accordingly. W.P.(C) 7504/2018 Page 1 of 3 W.P.(C) 7504/2018 & CM APPL.28679/2018 (Interim Relief) 1. The present petition under Articlesof the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to: a) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction/(s) directing ...
Ramesh Haldar vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
#58 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8137/2018 RAMESH HALDAR Judgment delivered on:06. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, Advocates : Mr. G.D. Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"In the facts and circumstances of the present case this Honble Court may pleased to: W.P.(C) 8137/2018 Page 1 of 3 a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the respondent i.e. premises bearing Plot No.6, C Extension Block, New Ashok Nagar, Delhi...
Amit Kumar vs.bharati College (University of Delhi ) and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:6. h August, 2018 LPA3992018 AMIT KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr Vishwendra Verma, Mr Pranav Verma and Ms Shivali, Advs versus BHARATI COLLEGE (UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ) & ORS Through: Ms Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) LPA3992018 and CM Nos. 29148/2018 (stay) and 30239/2018 (stay) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 12.07.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this appeal are that four complaints of sexual harassment were made against the appellant. Three complaints were made between the period February 2017 and April 2017 and another complaint was made in the month of February 2018. It is the stand of the counsel for the appellant that the first three complaints have been filed beyond the period of limitation and the fourth com...
Lok Nayak Hospital vs.prema
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.56/2006 Reserved on :31. t July, 2018 Pronounced on :6. h August,2018 LOK NAYAK HOSPITAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zahid Hanief, Adv. for Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Adv. for GNCTD. PREMA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. O.N. Sharma and Ms. Pratima Parihar, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit/Lok Nayak Hospital, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi, impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 16.8.2005 by which the trial court decreed the suit for recovery of monies filed by the respondent/plaintiff and passed a decree for a sum of Rs. 2,20,000/-. Out of the amount of Rs. 2,20,000/- a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- has been directed to be put in a RFA562006 Page 1 of 18 fixed deposit in the name of the child Aman and till his attaining age of 18 ...
M/S. Aithent Technologies Pvt Ltd vs.archana Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.608/2014 + % M/S. AITHENT TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD6h August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Chaudhary, Advocate. versus ARCHANA VERMA ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.608/2014 and C.M. Appl. No.19392/2014 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code Civil Procedure,1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 8.8.2014 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff/ex- employee for a sum of Rs.2,23,200/- with interest at the rate of 7% per annum, on account of part unpaid salary for the period from 1.4.2002 to 31.3.2003. RFA No.608/2014 Page 1 of 7 2. The facts of the case are that respondent/plaintiff was appointed by the appellant/defendant with effect from 1.11.2001 and the respondent/plaintiff worked at the Gur...
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.avinash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO3152018 Judgment reserved on :31. t July, 2018 Date of decision :6. h August, 2018 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED ..... Appellant. AVINASH Through: Mr. Puneet Bhalla, Advocate Versus Through: .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant assails the impugned order dated 30.05.2018 of the learned Trial Court in CS No.18whereby on a suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery along with an application Under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for appointment of a receiver to take over the possession of the vehicle, i.e., car make ENJOY/LS7STAR bearing registration No.HR51 BD5092 the learned Trial Court directed the issuance of the summons for settlement of issues along with the notice of the said application to the defendant returnable for 9.10.2018.2. The prayer made by the appellant herein as plaintiff to the said suit seeking appointment of an ex parte receiv...
All India Carrom Federation vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: July 23, 2018 Judgment delivered on: August 06, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3314/2016, CM Nos. 38513-38514/2017 ALL INDIA CARROM FEDERATION ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.D. Narayan, General Secretary of the... Petitioner- Federation in person versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Ms.Komaldeep, Adv. for respondent No.1- Union of India Mr.Aseem Mehrotra, Adv. with Mr.Devang Gautam, Adv. for R2 + W.P.(C) 5684/2016 VIJAY KUMAR ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jal Sahai Endlaw, Adv. with Mr.Devang Gautam, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms.Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. for respondent-Union of India CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT W.P.(C) No.3314/2016 and connected matter Page 1 of 80 V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 As these two writ petitions relate to elections in the All India Carrom Federation, (AICF) with the consent of the counsel f...