Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ihhr Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Vs.ananda Resort
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 356/2017 & I.A.No.5986/2017 Through Mr.Shantanu Sood, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendant versus $~11 * + IHHR HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. ANANDA RESORT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Through None CORAM: Date of Decision:06. h April, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A.5986/2017 The ex parte ad interim injunction order dated 16th May, 2017 is confirmed till the disposal of the present suit. CS(COMM) 356/2017 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, unfair competition, delivery up and recovery of damages.2. Since the defendant has neither filed its written statement nor entered appearance, it is proceeded ex parte. CS (COMM) 356/2017 Page 1 of 4 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the plaintiff gives up prayers 48(c) and (d) of the prayer clause to the suit. He prays that in view of the judgment of this Court in Satya Infrastructure...
Commercial Senior Secondary School vs.directorate of Education and Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 3320/2018 & CM130372018 COMMERCIAL SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Ms. Shivangi Singh and Mr. Sameer Sidhar, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Niharika Beri, Advocate for Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Learned counsel for petitioner submits that relief claimed in this petition is qua first respondent only. The grievance of petitioner is that despite sending of numerous communications and reminders to respondent-Directorate of Education, a Nominee has not been appointed by respondent-Directorate of Education to enable petitioner to initiate disciplinary proceedings against second respondent, who was unauthorizedly absent for twenty months.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with di...
Anu Yadav vs.secretary (School Edu. And Literacy) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2847/2018 & CM Nos.11548/2018, 11549/2018 Date of Decision :06. 04.2018 ANU YADAV Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner SECRETARY (SCHOOL EDU. AND LITERACY) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manik Dogra, Sr. Govt. Counsel for R-1. Mr.Amit Bansal with Ms.Manisha Singh & Ms.Seema Dolo, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to 1. respondent No.2 to accept the examination fees in the sum of Rs.1,400/- and permit the petitioner to appear in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET Exam), 2018 held on 06.05.2018, for which the last date was upto 11:50 pm on 13.03.2018.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a meritorious student having obtained 94.6% in the senior secondary examination held in the year 2017. He further submits that petitioner had appeared in the NEET Exam-2...
Balraj @ Bante vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 06, 2018 CRL.A. 203/2011 BALRAJ @ BANTE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Faheem Shah, Advocate with appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, Advocate. PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) 1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant impugning the judgment 22.01.2011 and order on sentence dated 24.01.2011 passed in Sessions Case No.N-whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 21(b) NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo RI for two-and-a-half years with fine of `25,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for six months.2. Briefly stating, the prosecution case is that in the month of April, 2009, Inspector Rajinder Singh Sehrawat of Special Cell received an information that a person by the name Bante was engaged in trafficking of Narcotic Drugs in Delhi. Insp.Rajinder Singh deployed his source to trace Bante. On 21.04.2009 the secret in...
Gautam Mehta, Director M/S Mehta Offset Pvt Ltd vs.jai Kishan and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~25 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:06. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 7354/2016 & CM APPL. 30217/2016 GAUTAM MEHTA, DIRECTOR M/S MEHTA OFFSET PVT LTD Through: Mr.Puneet Saini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus JAI KISHAN AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Krishan Kumar Pandey, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD for R- 2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 07.04.2016 passed by the Controlling Authority under sub- section (4) of Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 despite the effective alternative remedy available under sub- section (7) of Section 7 of the said Act. Similar writ petition was dismissed by this court in the case of Thai Airways International Public Company Ltd. Vs. Gurvinder Singh, 2018 LLR390 W.P. (C) 7354/2016 Page 1 of 2 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, subm...
Sunil Chopra vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~8 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1735/2017 VIMMI PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1738/2017 SUNIL CHOPRA Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1740/2017 SAHIL PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1742/2017 SANJEEV PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankush Narang & Ms. Shivani Kant For the Respondent : Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State SI Ajay Kumar, PS Kirti Nagar BAIL APPLN. 1735/2017, 1738/2017, 1740/2017, 1742/2017 Page 1 of 3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0604.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.133/2016 under Sections 420/4IPC, Police Station Kirti Nagar.2. Learned Senior...
Vasudha Srivastava vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 3362/2018 & CM132632018 W.P.(C) 3375/2018 & CM132822018 W.P.(C) 3376/2018 & CM132832018 PUJA KUMAR LAXMI RANA VASUDHA SRIVASTAVA .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pushpendra Kumar, Mr. Pavan Kumar and Mr. Prevendra Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for respondent No.1-UOI Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the above-captioned three petitions, the claim of petitioners is that they were appointed on compassionate ground and they have rendered service of about 16 years. It is case of petitioners that they had sought regularization of their service vide various Representations and the last Representation was made by petitioners to second respondent on 30th January, 2017, which was followed by Reminder of 9th March, ...
Suresh Kumar Yadav vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : April 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 3284/2018 & CM Nos.12904-05/2018 SURESH KUMAR YADAV Through: Mr.Harish Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocates for R-2 and R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Quashing of office memorandum of 4th November, 2016 (Annexure P-3) and office order of 15th December, 2016 (Annexure P-5) is sought by petitioner who claims to be working as Staff Nurse with respondent- Institute. Against office memorandum of 4th November, 2016, petitioner claims to have made a representation (Annexure P-4) on 7th November, 2016 and according to petitioners counsel, there is no response to the said representation. However, against office order of 15th December, 2016, no representation has been made by petitioner.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it...
Diksha Lamba vs.university Grants Commission & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on -14.03.2018. Date of Decision - 06.04.2018. ........ Petitioner DIKSHA LAMBA + W.P.(C) 5039/2017 & CM No.21684/2017 (for stay) UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION & ORS Through Mr.Ilam Paridi, Adv. versus Through Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Adv for ..... Respondent R-1. Mr.B.S.Rana, Adv for R-2. Mr.Amit Bansal, Adv for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J1 Vide the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the... Petitioner has sought quashing of letter dated 19.11.2015 issued by the Respondent No.1/University Grants Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Letter), whereby the... Petitioner was informed that her result of the National Eligibility Test (hereinafter referred to as NET) held on 30.12.2012 was cancelled after three years, on the ground that she did not fulfill the eligibility criteria for the said examination, since her Masters degree from the Universi...
D. K. Chopra vs.nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:06. 04.2018 D. K. CHOPRA + W.P.(C) 3369/2018... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner Through : versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Shreya Mehta and Ms. Niharika, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J (ORAL) 1. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Anupam Srivastava accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2. The petitioner, who appears in person says that his grievance is that the officer concerned i.e., Ms. Shilpa Shinde, Director, Child Women and Social Welfare Department, GNCTD, is not according to him, granting a hearing for redressal of his grievance.3. Mr. Srivastava, who appears on advance notice, says that the petitioner has been given an appointment for this very purpose on 11.4.2018 at 03:00 pm. 3.1 Mr. Srivastavas emphasizes, though, that the petitioner tends not to behave in a civilized manner when called...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »