Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gautam Mehta, Director M/S Mehta Offset Pvt Ltd vs.bikram Singh and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~23 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:06. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 7352/2016 & CM APPL. 30213-30214/2016 GAUTAM MEHTA, DIRECTOR M/S MEHTA OFFSET PVT LTD Through: Mr.Puneet Saini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus BIKRAM SINGH AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Krishan Kumar Pandey, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD for R- 2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 07.04.2016 passed by the Controlling Authority under sub- section (4) of Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 despite the effective alternative remedy available under sub- section (7) of Section 7 of the said Act. Similar writ petition was dismissed by this court in the case of Thai Airways International Public Company Ltd. Vs. Gurvinder Singh, 2018 LLR390 W.P. (C) 7352/2016 Page 1 of 2 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructio...
Sanjeev Puri vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~8 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1735/2017 VIMMI PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1738/2017 SUNIL CHOPRA Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1740/2017 SAHIL PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1742/2017 SANJEEV PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankush Narang & Ms. Shivani Kant For the Respondent : Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State SI Ajay Kumar, PS Kirti Nagar BAIL APPLN. 1735/2017, 1738/2017, 1740/2017, 1742/2017 Page 1 of 3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0604.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.133/2016 under Sections 420/4IPC, Police Station Kirti Nagar.2. Learned Senior...
Laxmi Juneja & Ors. Vs.krishan Pal & Ors (Icici Lombard General Insura ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 06, 2018 MAC.APP. 342/2015 & CM75902015 M/S. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Appellant LAKSHMI JUNEJA & ORS. MAC.APP. 359/2015 Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Madhav Khosla, Advocate Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate .....Respondents M/S. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Appellant LAKSHMI JUNEJA & ORS. Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate .....Respondents MAC.APP.374/2015 Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate versus LAXMI JUNEJA & ORS. KRISHAN PAL & ORS (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) MAC.APP. 416/2015 LAKSHMI JUNEJA KRISHAN PAL & ORS (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD) Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate versus .....Appellant .....Appellants .....Respondent ....Respondents MAC.APP. 342/2015& Connected matters Page 1 of 9 CORAM: HON'...
Beerabahadur Yadav and Ors vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : April 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 6603/2016 BEERABAHADUR YADAV AND ORS Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER UNION OF INDIA AND ANR versus CM No.12629/2018 (ORAL) Delay of 29 days in filing the rejoinder is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) No.6603/2016 & CM No.41371/2017 1. In pursuance to advertisement No.3/2015, petitioners had applied for the post of Junior Executive (Air Traffic Control) and had cleared the online examination and were called for the interview. The grievance of petitioners in this petition is that final result in respect of the aforesaid post advertised had not been declared. Quashing of first phase of interview conducted in respect of 1028 candidates is also sought. A mandamus is also sought to respondents to consider calling ...
Bhagwant Singh Pabla & Ors. Vs.current Advertising (P.) Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"6th April, 2018 BHAGWANT SINGH PABLA & ORS. Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Advocate. ........ Petitioners CURRENT ADVERTISING (P.) LTD. & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Atul Nigam, Advocate for R-2. CM (M) 433/2013 + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) versus 1. The petitioners admittedly are the landlords qua the premises described as third floor of property bearing No.4-E/7, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi (subject premises), let out initially by a lease deed (Ex.PW-1/R1) dated 27. 06.1979 in the name of a partnership firm described as M/s. Current Advertising and Marketing in which M.L. Aggarwal and R.P. Aggarwal were partners. It is not disputed that tenancy had been created by Mr. Dial Singh Pabla, who having died, the petitioners having stepped into his shoes as his successors-in- interest. It is further an admitted fact that the said partnership firm was converted into a private limited company in the n...
Gautam Mehta, Director M/S Mehta Offset Pvt Ltd vs.hardayal Singh and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~24 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:06. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 7353/2016 & CM APPL. 30215/2016 GAUTAM MEHTA, DIRECTOR M/S MEHTA OFFSET PVT LTD Through: Mr.Puneet Saini, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus HARDAYAL SINGH AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Krishan Kumar Pandey, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD for R- 2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 07.04.2016 passed by the Controlling Authority under sub- section (4) of Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 despite the effective alternative remedy available under sub- section (7) of Section 7 of the said Act. Similar writ petition was dismissed by this court in the case of Thai Airways International Public Company Ltd. Vs. Gurvinder Singh, 2018 LLR390 W.P. (C) 7353/2016 Page 1 of 2 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, ...
Sahil Puri vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~8 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1735/2017 VIMMI PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1738/2017 SUNIL CHOPRA Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1740/2017 SAHIL PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1742/2017 SANJEEV PURI Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankush Narang & Ms. Shivani Kant For the Respondent : Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State SI Ajay Kumar, PS Kirti Nagar BAIL APPLN. 1735/2017, 1738/2017, 1740/2017, 1742/2017 Page 1 of 3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0604.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.133/2016 under Sections 420/4IPC, Police Station Kirti Nagar.2. Learned Senior...
M/S. Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.lakshmi Juneja & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 06, 2018 MAC.APP. 342/2015 & CM75902015 M/S. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Appellant LAKSHMI JUNEJA & ORS. MAC.APP. 359/2015 Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Madhav Khosla, Advocate Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate .....Respondents M/S. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Appellant LAKSHMI JUNEJA & ORS. Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate .....Respondents MAC.APP.374/2015 Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate versus LAXMI JUNEJA & ORS. KRISHAN PAL & ORS (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) MAC.APP. 416/2015 LAKSHMI JUNEJA KRISHAN PAL & ORS (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD) Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate versus .....Appellant .....Appellants .....Respondent ....Respondents MAC.APP. 342/2015& Connected matters Page 1 of 9 CORAM: HON'...
Wanderlust Travels Pvt Ltd vs.delhi Tourism and Transportation Develop ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :03. d April, 2018 Pronounced on :06. h April, 2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 23/2018 WANDERLUST TRAVELS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, Mr.Vinit Trehan and Mr.Aditya Trehan, Advocates. versus DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Prashanto Chandra Sen, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Puja Dewan, Mr.Uday Seth and Mr.Parth Kochatta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner against the respondent in respect of an agreement dated 10.11.2017 executed between them.2. The brief facts as alleged by the petitioner are as follows: (a) The petitioner is one of India's leading adventure sports company with over 25 years of experience in the field of adventure sports having worldwide affiliations and technical...
Sorabh Paliwal and Anr. Vs.satyawati College and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : April 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 3303/2018 & CM Nos.12934-35/2018 SORABH PALIWAL AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Puneet Kumar Raid and Mr.Neeraj Kumar Shah, Advocates with... Petitioner No.2 in person versus SATYAWATI COLLEGE AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Beenashaw N.Soni, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Mr.Prang Newmai and Ms.Slomita Rai, Advocates for R-2 Ms.Isha Mital and Mr.Apoorv Kurup, Advocates for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the first round of litigation, respondent-college was directed to consider petitioners representations and to convey the fate of representations to petitioners, which has not been done. Learned counsel for respondent-college submits that in the minutes of the meeting of the governing body of respondent-college held on 8th March, 2018, the representations of petitioners have been decided and its fate would be shortly conveyed to petitioners. How...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »