Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshmi Juneja vs.krishan Pal & Ors (Icici Lombard General Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 06, 2018 MAC.APP. 342/2015 & CM75902015 M/S. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Appellant LAKSHMI JUNEJA & ORS. MAC.APP. 359/2015 Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Madhav Khosla, Advocate Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate .....Respondents M/S. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .....Appellant LAKSHMI JUNEJA & ORS. Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate .....Respondents MAC.APP.374/2015 Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate versus LAXMI JUNEJA & ORS. KRISHAN PAL & ORS (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) MAC.APP. 416/2015 LAKSHMI JUNEJA KRISHAN PAL & ORS (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD) Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate Through: Mr. Ankit Kalra, Advocate Through: Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advocate versus .....Appellant .....Appellants .....Respondent ....Respondents MAC.APP. 342/2015& Connected matters Page 1 of 9 CORAM: HON'...
Devendra Kumar and Anr. Vs.bal Bharti Public School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~18 to 21, 26 & 27. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :06. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 11611/2017 & C.M. Nos.47282-83/2018 RADHA KRISHAN & ORS. Through Mr.N.K. Upadhyay, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus BAL BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Kamal Gupta, Adv. for R-1. for ASC Mr.Satyakam, Directorate of Education. + W.P.(C) 495/2018 DEVENDRA KUMAR AND ANR. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.N.K. Upadhyay, Adv. with Mr.S.P. Pandey, Adv. versus BAL BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Kamal Gupta, Adv. for R-1. Ms.Hetu Arora, Adv. Mr.Satyakam, Mr.Yogesh Kumar, for DEO Zone XI for Directorate of Education GNCTD. ASC with + W.P.(C) 28/2018 & C.M. No.104/2018 SH. ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.N.K. Upadhyay, Adv. versus DE INDIAN SCHOOL AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. with W.P.(C)No.11611/2017 & conn. Page 1 of 6 Ms.Urvi Mohan, Adv. for GNCTD. + W.P.(C) 409/2018 & C.M. Nos.1753-175...
V.r.k. Nair vs.uoi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 3288/2003 V.R.K. NAIR UOI AND OTHERS versus Judgment Reserved on:12. 02.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:06. 04.2018 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. : Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.JUDGMENT The present petition seeks quashing of order dated 30.01.2002 passed 1. by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as CAT) in OA No.277/2001, whereby, the original application filed by the petitioner, seeking proforma promotion under NBR w.e.f. 17.08.1992 (i.e. the date of promotion of his junior S.P. Jindal as EAD/AE), or alternatively to fix his basic pay in the grade of EAD/AE in the scale of Rs.6,500-10,500/-, at par with his juniors who were promoted along with him; came to be dismissed. W.P.(...
Jaswin Arora vs.harmeet Singh Sood & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. h April, 2018 Pronounced on:06. h April, 2018 CS(OS) 3056/2014, IA Nos.19555-19556/2014, 13825/2016, 601/2018, 3154-3155/2018, O.A. 8/2018 JASWIN ARORA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Kunal Tandon and Ms.Ria Anand, Advocates. versus HARMEET SINGH SOOD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Pardeep Gupta, Mr.Parinav Gupta, Ms.Mansi Gupta and Mr.Moazzam Ali, Advocates for D-6. Mr.Rajshekhar Rao and Mr.Ravi Kapoor, Advocates for D-7. Mr.Kush Sharma, Advocate for DDA. Mr.Manish Sharma and Mr.Ninad Dogra, Advocates for Applicants in IA No.11797/2017. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.11797/2017 1. This application under Section 151 CPC is moved by the applicant Smt.Sangeeta Sen, an owner of the front ground floor portion of the CS(OS) No.3056/2014 Page 1 of 9 premises bearing No.D-16, Greater Kailash Enclave, New Delhi, seeking clarification of the orders dated 09.10.2014 and 23.11.2015 passed by this Cou...
Sanjeev Chugh ( Deceased)through His Lrs vs.om Prakash Batra & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:06. 04.2018 RC.REV. 338/2014 SANJEEV CHUGH ( DECEASED)THROUGH HIS LRS..... Petitioner Through Mr.Subhiksh Vasudev, Advocate Versus OM PRAKASH BATRA & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.K.R.Gupta and Mr.Nitin Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present Revision Petition is filed under section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 ( hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 15.7.2014 by which an order of eviction was passed on a petition filed by the respondents/landlord under section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act.2. The respondents/landlords filed the Eviction Petition under section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act for property being Mezzanine Floor measuring 700 sq.ft. H-4/4, Model Town-II, Delhi which was let out to the petitioner @ Rs.300/- per month. The property originally belonged to Shri Rajender Singh. He sold the aforesaid property to the respondents on 22.5...
Getamber Anand & Anr. Vs.anil Kumar Saha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:06. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 258/2017 & IA Nos.7520/2017 & 8780/2017 GETAMBER ANAND & ANR. .....Petitioners Versus ANIL KUMAR SAHA Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner .....Respondent For the Respondent :Mr Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate with : Mr Ninad Laud, Mr Kunal Kher and : Mr Ivo DCosta, Advocates. :Mr Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate with : Mr Abhijeet Sinha, Mr Arijit Mazumdar, : Mr shambo Nandy, Mr Akshay Chandna, : Mr Saikat Sarkar and Ms Rashmi Gogoi, : Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 04.03.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by a Sole Arbitrator, Dr. Justice Mukandkam Sharma, former Judge of the Supreme Court of India in the matter numbered as Ar...
Puja Kumar vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 06, 2018 W.P.(C) 3362/2018 & CM132632018 W.P.(C) 3375/2018 & CM132822018 W.P.(C) 3376/2018 & CM132832018 PUJA KUMAR LAXMI RANA VASUDHA SRIVASTAVA .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pushpendra Kumar, Mr. Pavan Kumar and Mr. Prevendra Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for respondent No.1-UOI Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the above-captioned three petitions, the claim of petitioners is that they were appointed on compassionate ground and they have rendered service of about 16 years. It is case of petitioners that they had sought regularization of their service vide various Representations and the last Representation was made by petitioners to second respondent on 30th January, 2017, which was followed by Reminder of 9th March, ...
Dev Chander Sood & Ors vs.h.l.sud & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h April, 2018. CS(OS) 280/2011 & IAs No.1926/2011 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 15149/2012 (of D-1 u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) DEV CHANDER SOOD & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Naresh Thanai Khushboo Singh, Advs. and Ms. Versus H.L.SUD & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: Ms. Anisha Mahajan, Adv. ..... Defendants The three plaintiffs, namely (i) Dev Chander Sood; (ii) Pradeep Sood; and, (iii) Pramod Sood instituted this suit for partition and injunction against five defendants namely (a) H.L. Sud; (b) Swatantra Prakash Sud; (c) Ashish Sud; (d) Lalit Sood; and, (e) Neelam Gajri.2. During the pendency of the suit, the defendant No.4 Lalit Sood died and had been substituted by his wife and two daughters namely (i) Geeta Sood; (ii) Sanya Sood; and, (iii) Anika Sood. The plaint was permitted to be amended during the pendency of the suit, according to the plaintiffs, to enable the plaintiffs to also claim the reli...
Vippy Solvex Products Ltd vs.state Trading Corporation (I) Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h April, 2018. CS(OS) No.1727/1992 VIPPY SOLVEX PRODUCTS LTD. .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jitender Ratta, Adv. Versus STATE TRADING CORPORATION (I) LTD. & ANR. ...Defendants Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Adv. for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has this suit instituted for recovery of Rs.1,16,33,378/- with interest from defendant no.1 State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. (STCIL) only, (defendant no.2 is Madhya Pradesh Export Corporation) pleading i) that M/s National Des Aliments Du Betail Algeria (Foreign Buyer) intended to purchase huge quantity of Indian Toasted Pure Yellow Soyameal through defendant no.1 and several contracts were entered into between the Foreign Buyer and the defendant no.1 for said purchase; ii) that in subsequent contracts, after first one (lead contract), for the said purchase, only the terms relating to time of delivery, price and quantities were stipulated with t...
Dhani Ram vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-06-2018
Date of Decision:06. h April, 2018 Through: Mr. Mohd. Azharuddin, Advocate ..... Appellant IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~8 * % + MAC.APP. 250/2017 and C.M. Appl. 10043/2017 DHANI RAM THE STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeshpal Singh and Mr. Naveen Lohia, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Ashok Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.2,35,000/- has been awarded to respondent No.2.2. The accident dated 03rd December, 2014 resulted in injuries to respondent No.2, who claimed compensation before the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.4,301/- towards medical treatment, Rs.20,000/- towards special diet, Rs.10,000/- towards conveyance, Rs.1 lakh towards pain and suffering and Rs.1 lakh towards loss of enjoyment of life. The total compensation awarded is Rs.2,35,000/-.3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »