Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jatinder Nath vs.m/s Chopra Land Developers & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 + RFA2102017 & CM APPL. 7806/2018 JATINDER NATH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Zaveri and Mr. Neel Kamal Mishra, Advocates. (M:9810156642) versus M/S CHOPRA LAND DEVELOPERS & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Advocate for R (M:9654427273) Mr. Shohit Chaudhary and Mr. Kushagra Nigam, Advocates for Mr. Rakesh Mathur. (M:9999091964) Mr. G. D. Mishra, Standing Counsel for SDMC. (M:8800821485) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff), Mr. Jatinder Nath, through his daughter and power of attorney holder, Ms. Vaishali Sood filed the subject suit seeking declaration, possession and consequential reliefs against M/s. Chopra Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. O. P. Chopra (hereinafter Builder) in respect of property measuring 400 Sq. Yards being G-13, Malviya Nagar Extension (now Saket), New Delhi (hereinafter the suit p...
Shyam Shankar Goela Through Rajiv Goela vs.uday Shanker Goela
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~2 & 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th April, 2018 + C.R.P. 122/2012 & CM No.5125/2014 + SHYAM SHANKAR GOELA THROUGH RAJIV GOELA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anish Dayal, Ms. Anjali Agarwal & Ms. Rupam Sharma, Advs. versus UDAY SHANKER GOELA Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. ..... Respondent C.R.P. 150/2012 & CM N. 8981/2013 UDAY SHANKER GOELA Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus SHYAM SHANKER GOELA THROUGH LRs....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anish Dayal, Ms. Anjali Agarwal & Ms. Rupam Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) These two revision petitions relate to the order dated 01.06.2012 passed by the Additional District Judge, as the executing court in execution proceedings registered as execution case No.47/2010. The C.R.P.Nos.122, 1Page 1 of 6 first captioned petition was filed by the party which was entitled under a compromise decree recorded on 26.03.2010 to purchase 50% share in the subject property i.e. pr...
Tej Pratap Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Dharambir vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Satya Sagar and Anr vs.air India (Aiesl) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 13, 2018 W.P.(C) 4484/2017 SATYA SAGAR AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Virender Kumar Sharma, Advocate Versus AIR INDIA (AIESL) AND ORS. Through: Ms. Suruchi Suri, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) By way of this writ petition, a mandamus is sought to respondents to conduct written examination for the post of Junior Service Engineer after training through Director General Civil Aviation under videography.2. For the relief claimed in this petition, no Representation has been made by petitioners. In the first instance, before approaching this Court, petitioners are required to represent to respondents.3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the said examination has to be conducted by first respondent.4. Be that as it may. Let petitioners make concise Representations to respondents within a week from today and if any such Representations are received by responde...
Sukrita Bajaj & Anr. Vs.sundeep @ Sandeep Sehgal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~2 (OS) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL13 2018 + CS(OS) 172/2017 & IA Nos.8222/2017 [u/O37R-3(4) r/w Section 151 CPC]., 4667/2017 (u/O39R-1 & 2 CPC). SUKRITA BAJAJ & ANR. Through : Ms.Sonali Malhotra with Mr.Amit ..... Plaintiffs versus Sanduja, Advocates. SUNDEEP @ SANDEEP SEHGAL ..... Defendant. Through : Mr.S.K.Khukla, proxy counsel with Defendant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P GARG, J.(ORAL) IA No.21[u/O37R-3(5) CPC]., 21(u/S151CPC) 1. Sukrita Bajaj and Sumita S.Chadha (hereinafter the plaintiffs) have filed the present suit for recovery of `3,66,62,760/- against Sundeep @ Sandeep Sehgal (hereinafter the defendant) under Order XXXVII CPC.2. The plaintiffs case is that their father late G.L.Tandon had three demat accounts with M/s Alankit Assignment Ltd. On the representation of the defendant to open demat account with M/s Apollo Sindhoori Capital Investments Ltd. with which he was a registered sub- broker, on 27.04.2005 G.L.Tandon o...
Dr. Alka Rai vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
* % + DR. ALKA RAI STATE & ANR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h April, 2018 CRL.L.P. 229/2018 Represented by: Mr. J.K. Singh and Ms. ........ Petitioner Madhulika Agarwal, Advocates. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS with ASI Asad Raza, Pairvi Officer, PS Dwarka, Sector-23. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 6658/2018 (Delay in refiling) For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 32 days in refiling the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.A. 6657/2018 (Delay in filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 936 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 229/2018 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 17th January, 2015, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, while setting aside the judgment dated 27th March, 2014 and order of sentence of even date, acquitted the respondent for...
Nathia Decd Thr. Lrs. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Kuldeep Singh (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Shri Kuldip Singh vs.the Director of Education, Govt. Of Nct of Delhi. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 13, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3632/2018 SHRI KULDIP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shravan Dev, Advocate Versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Rachna Srivastava & Ms. Sudipta Sarkar, Advocates for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks re-employment on the post of Physical Education Teacher (PET).... Petitioner claims to have written to respondent- Directorate of Education on 20th February, 2018 (Annexure P-6) to issue a direction to Managing Committee of respondent-School to allow him to join as PET under the re-employment scheme.2.... Petitioner claims to have made Representation to respondent- School in January, 2018 but to no avail. It is the case of petitioner that respondent-School vide Communication of 7th March, 2018 (Annexure P-9) had expressed inability to permit petitioner to join the school under the re-em...