Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 13 2018

Kuldeep Singh vs.sanjay Aggarwal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:13. 04.2018 RC.REV. 131/2016 KULDEEP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajat Aneja & M.Shifa Nagar, Advocates for the petitioner. Versus SANJAY AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Mr.V.S.Dubey & the for Mr.J.P.Tiwari, Advocates respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This revision petition is filed by the petitioner/tenant under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the eviction order dated 05.11.2015 passed by the court of Rent Controller.2. The landlord/respondent let out the property i.e. a shop part of Khasra No.642, Village Chandrawali, Shahdara, Delhi to the petitioner/tenant. The respondent filed an eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act. It was stated in the eviction petition that the premises was required by the respondent bona fide for his wife who is completely dependent on hi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Coal India Limited vs.r. K. Gupta & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. 07.2017 Date of Decision:13. 04.2018 + L.P.A.640/2013 COAL INDIA LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anup Sachthey with Ms. Anjali Chauhan and Ms. Ria Sachthey, Advs. versus R.K.GUPTA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J1 The present intra court appeal impugns the judgment dated 04.04.2013 passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court (hereinafter referred to as the "Impugned Judgment"), allowing the Respondent No.1/Employees Writ Petition bearing W.P.(C) No.11371/2006 and directing that, within four weeks of the Respondent No.1 returning the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) benefits along with interest @ 12% per annum, the Appellant would within L.P.A. 640/2013 Page 1 of 19 four weeks thereafter release the entire arrears of pension from the date of filing the writ petition along with similar interest ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Dharam Pal & Ors. Vs.union of India & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Jai Prakash vs.anoop Singhal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.20/2018 and C.M. No.14458/2018 (under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC) % JAI PRAKASH ANOOP SINGHAL13h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. Through: versus Through: Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Advocate ..... Respondent with Mr. Raman Gandhi, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 30.10.2017 by which trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking recovery of possession and mesne profits with respect to the suit property being half portion of shop on the ground floor, one room with bathroom and kitchen on the first floor and one room kitchen, RFA No.20/2018 Page 1 of 12 bathroom on the second floor as shown in red colour in the site plan filed with the plaint...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Tara Chand (Thr Lrs) vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :12. h January, 2018 Date of decision :13. h April, 2018 RFA7542016 + DHANI RAM (THRS LRS) Through: versus Mr. Anand Yadav and Ms. Anita Tomar, Advocates. (M:98101. 6454) . .... Appellant DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Senior Advocate and Mr. Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocate. (M:98180. 9957) Through: AND RFA7712016 + TARA CHAND (THR LRS) Appellant Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate. (M:98101. 6454) versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia & Ms. Vasudha Trivedi, Advocates. (M:98180. 9957) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh J, 1. The present appeals arise out of a suit for damages filed by the Appellants/Plaintiffs (hereinafter Plaintiffs) against the Delhi RFA Nos. 754/2016 & 771/2016 Page 1 of 22 Development Authority (hereinafter DDA), its Senior officers and two members of the Del...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

M. Rehan & Anr. Vs.union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. 04.2018 FAO3122017 M. REHAN & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ajit Rajput, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Suvira Lal, Advocate, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) This appeal impugns an order dated 02.03.2017 dismissing the 1. appellants claim for compensation for death of their son Subhan in a railway accident on 17.11.2015. The deceased was travelling from Hazrat Nizamuddin to Ahmedabad in the general compartment of Train No.12918, Gujarat Sampark Kranti Express. Due to heavy rush of passengers, he could get space only near the gate of train compartment. In the intervening night of 17th and 18th November, 2015, while the train was passing between Ratlam and Raoti Railway Station, he fell from the train because of a sudden jerk in it. He sustained grievous injuries and died on the spot. His demise in the train accident is not in dispute. T...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Mrs. Vasumati Mahajan and Anr. Vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation an ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: April 06, 2018 Judgment delivered on: April 13, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1524/2018, CM No.6253/2018 MRS. VASUMATI MAHAJAN AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr. Sachin Jain, And Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs. for R1. Mr. A.K. Vali and Mr. Bhaskar Vali, Advs. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:-"In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to pass: A. of PROHIBITION, Respondent Nos. 1 A Writ, Order and/or Direction in the nature the from granting any inter alia restraining to 3 W.P.(C) No.1524/2018 Page 1 of 60 any including permission to Respondent No.4 and/...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Parsandi (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Vs.union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Santosh Kumar Jain vs.kiran Jain & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h April, 2018 CS(OS) 3139/1991 SANTOSH KUMAR JAIN Through: Plaintiff-in-person. ..... Plaintiff Versus MEHTAB SINGH JAIN & ORS Through: None. ..... Defendants AND CS(OS) 3371/1992 SANTOSH KUMAR JAIN Through: Plaintiff-in-person. .... Plaintiff KIRAN JAIN & ORS. Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Adv. for D-9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CS(OS) No.3139/1991 1. The sole plaintiff instituted this suit for partition of 1/6th share claimed by the plaintiff in (i) 7/23, Makhan Lal Street, Darya Ganj, New Delhi; (ii) 1/4th share in property no.1213 to 1216, Chandni Chowk, Delhi (sold by defendant no.1 for Rs.2,00,000/-); (iii) 1/5th share in property bearing no.301, Dariba Kalan, Delhi; (iv) property no.302 to CS(OS) No.3139/1991 & CS(OS) No.3371/1992 Page 1 of 21 305, Dariba Kalan, Delhi; (v) half portion of property no.279/301, Dariba Kalan; and, (vi) plot at Rangmahal Co-operative Socie...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Dhani Ram (Thrs Lrs) vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.