Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Pal vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Yash Pal Singh vs.sanjay Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:13. 04.2018 RC.REV. 132/2016 YASH PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajat Aneja & M.Shifa Nagar, Advocates for the petitioner. Versus SANJAY AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Mr.V.S.Dubey & the for Mr.J.P.Tiwari, Advocates respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This revision petition is filed by the petitioner/tenant under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the eviction order dated 05.11.2015 passed by the court of Rent Controller.2. The landlord/respondent let out the property i.e. a shop part of Khasra No.642, Village Chandrawali, Shahdara, Delhi to the petitioner/tenant. The respondent filed an eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act. It was stated in the eviction petition that the premises was required by the respondent bona fide for his wife who is completely dependent on h...
Sukhbir Singh & Anr vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Kuldeep Kumar vs.state (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.459 /2002 & Crl. MA15722002 and Crl. MB4412018 Date of Order:13th April 2018 KULDEEP KUMAR ...Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar (amicus curiae), Mr. Anirudh Tanwar and Ms. Shaima Khan, Advocates. STATE (NCT) of Delhi versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 29th April 2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.55/2001 arising out of an FIR No.713/1996 registered at Police Station (PS) Dabri convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated 8th May 2002 whereby he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one day.2. The Appellant was charged with committing the murder of his wife, Sushila (dec...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.msv International Inc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h April, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 153/2018 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Bajaj, Mr.Soayib Qureshi, Mr.Naman Tandon, Advs. versus MSV INTERNATIONAL INC ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rohit Goel, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA49602018 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. OMP (Comm.) 153/2018 1. Issue notice. Mr.Rohit Goel, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.2. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 12th December, 2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three Arbitrators.3. The disputes between the parties are in relation to the OMP(Comm) No.153/2018 Page 1 Agreement dated 20th November, 2006 by which the petitioner granted to the respondent the work of pr...
Prabhu Dayal vs.lekh Raj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th April, 2018 + RC.REV. 589/2012 PRABHU DAYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Ahuja, Advocate with Mr. D.S. Vohra, Adv. LEKH RAJ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate 1. ORDER (ORAL) The respondent had filed a case (E. No.113/2011) for eviction against the petitioner on 14.09.2010 on the ground of bona fide need under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in respect of premises described as shop forming part of property bearing No.618/5-F, Near Ravidas Mandir, Vishwas Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi, as shown in colour red in the site plan (Ex.PW-1/A) submitted with the petition.2. Having regard to the ground for eviction, additional rent controller (ARC) applied the procedure envisaged in Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The petitioner on being served with the said summons under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, moved an ...
Himanshu Dabas & Ors. Vs.central Board of Secondary Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
Mr.Amit Bansal, Adv. for R- 1/CBSE. Mr.Arunima Dwivedi, Adv. with Ms.Preeti Kumra, Adv., Ms.Swati Jhunjunwala, Adv. for R-2/NCTE. Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-3. Ms.Rashmi Chopra, Adv. with Ms.Ranjana Deswal, Special Director of Education, GNCTD for R-4. Mr.Uttam Datt, Adv. with Ms.Riya Gulati, Adv. for R-5. $~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) No.9237/2017 HIMANSHU DABAS & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rakesh Dhingra, Adv. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ORS. Through Ms.Seema Dolo, Adv. for ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners who claim to be holders of Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) /Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.), have sought a direction to the WP (C) No.9237/2017 Page 1 of 5 respondents to hold the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) as expeditiously as possible.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submi...
R B Suri vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 769/2017 Judgment delivered on:12. 04.2018 R B SURI STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Viraj Kadam, Advocate Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State. Ms. Parveen Rawal with Ms. Usha Singh, Advocates for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1204.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 769/2017 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 18.09.2017 of the Appellate Court, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner impugning the judgment dated 16.05.2017 and order on sentence dated 17.05.2017 was dismissed.2. Respondent no.2 had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 qua a cheque in the sum of Rs.2,60,000/-.3.... Petitioner was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs. 5,20,000/- i.e. double the cheque amount and in CRL.REV.P. 769/2017 P...
M/S Welldone Exim Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as M/S g.d. Mangalam Exim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.5082/2017 Date of decision:12. h April, 2018 M/S WELLDONE EXIM PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S G.D. MANGALAM EXIM PVT. LTD.) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. G.K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava and Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR...Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate for DGFT. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.5091/2017 M/S ATTIRE DEISIGNERS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S ........ Petitioner SIDH DESIGNERS PVT. LTD.) Through Mr. G.K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava and Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR...Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate for DGFT. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs. W.P. (C) Nos. 5082/2017, 5091/2017 & 5093/2017 Page 1 of 14 M/S GOODONE TRADERS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S ...
Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (Dfccil) vs.m/ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 150/2018 DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED (DFCCIL) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr P. Nagesh with Mr Ashutosh Jha, Advocates. Versus M/S FERROVIA TRANSRAIL SOLUTION PVT LTD. Through: Mr Anil Seth, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1204.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the above captioned petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 13.10.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by three members, Sh Deepak Krishan (Presiding Arbitrator), Sh Budh Prakash and Sh Vipin Jha (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in respect of the Contract Agreement dated 12.04.2013 (hereafter the Agreement).2. The petitioner has also filed an application (IA ...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »