Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 16 2018

Union of India & Anr vs.b.c. Kailay

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

$~10 * + W.P.(C) 1932/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ANR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Devi Krishan Sharma, Advocate ..... Respondent versus B.C. KAILAY CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER1604.2018 W.P.(C) 1932/2017 1. The petitioner No.1/UOI and petitioner No.2/National Informatics Centre, Department of Electronics & Information Technology (in short NIC) are aggrieved by the order dated 03.06.2016, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, allowing OA No.1420/2015, filed by the respondent, seeking directions to implement the office order dated 02.01.2013 with all consequential benefits and interest.2. A glance on the admitted facts of the case is considered necessary. The respondent had joined the NIC as a Scientist/Engineer Gr. SD (Scientist-C) on 10.02.1984. On 18.03.2005, the respondent was found guilty for the offences punishable under Section 120-B r/w Sections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018

Nitika Kandhari Guleria vs.harbans Singh Guleria

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

$~36 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"16th April, 2018 + C.R.P. 74/2018 and CM1456514566/2018 NITIKA KANDHARI GULERIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.Tewari, Advocate ..... Respondent versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA HARBANS SINGH GULERIA ORDER (ORAL) Through: None 1. The petitioner is the defendant in the civil suit (CS9072007) instituted by the respondent for reliefs of possession, mandatory injunction and recovery including of mesne profits. The petitioner (defendant) is the wife of the son of the respondent (plaintiff). It appears that she is in possession of a property bearing flat no.1026, United Friends (U.F.) Appartments Society, Plot-9, Sector-6, Dwarka, New Delhi. The plaintiff claims to be the owner of the said property. According to his case, the defendant had come to be in use and occupation of the said property on account of she being the daughter- in-law. It appears the marriage of the defendant with the son of the plaintiff has run into...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018

Mulkh Raj vs.tata Power Ddl/Ndpl

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MULKH RAJ RFA No.311/2018 16th April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Advocate. versus TATA POWER DDL/NDPL ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.14334/2018 (delay of 150 days in filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing is condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM No.14336/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.311/2018 & CM No.14335/2018 (Stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 4.8.2017 by which the RFA No.311/2018 Page 1 of 6 trial court has dismissed the suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff for quashing of the bill for an amount of Rs.50,486/- raised by the respondent/defendant on accou...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018

Arjun vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

$~2 to 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1025/2016 MAHENDER @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1138/2016 ..... Respondent RAJU CHHAKA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. STATE RAJU BHAJJE STATE ARJUN STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1139/2016 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1140/2016 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1141/2016 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Page 1 of 19 + + + + + MOHD. RAJA CRL.A. 1025/2016 & connected matters CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR STATE Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Introduction JUDGMENT1604 .2018 1. A shocking incident of gang rape of a Danish touri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018

Yamuna Prasad vs.indraprastha Power Generation Company Limited & Praga ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 16, 2018 W.P.(C) 2997/2016 & CM125792016 W.P.(C) 4072/2016 & CM171162016 W.P.(C) 4649/2016 W.P.(C) 7270/2016 & CM299362016 AJAY KUMAR SINHA GOPAL SINGH YAMUNA PRASAD VP SINGH Versus Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioners INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED & PRAGATI POWER CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Vatsa and Ms. Mumari Alka, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners in the above-captioned four petitions seek antedating of their promotion on the post of Deputy Manager (Technical). Learned W.P.(C) 2997/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 7 counsel for petitioners submits that Annual Performance Appraisal Report (hereinafter referred to as APAR) of petitioner-Ajay Kumar of the year 2004-05 was reviewed in the year 2015 from Average to Good and so, petitioner has to be promoted from the year 2008 and not from the yea...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018

Pro Commissioner of Income-Tax-2 vs.m/s Chrys Capital Investment Advis ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 16.4.2018 + ITA3462018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus ........ Appellant CHRYSCAPITAL LTD. .. ... Respondent + ITA3492018 PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ....... Appellant versus MIS CHRYS CAPITAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... RESPONDENTPresent : Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing counsel for appellant. Mr.Vikas Shrivastava, Mr.Mayank Ms.Kanika Jain, Advocates. Aggarwal and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (Open Court) 1.2. Appeals are dismissed. For reasons, the judgment dated 16.4.2018 in ITA6342017 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J A. K. CHAWLA, J APRIL16 2018/ndn...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018

Lt Col Sameer Singh vs.union of India and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~9 * + W.P.(C) 9233/2016, CM Nos.37328/2016 & 14651/2018 LT COL SAMEER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Arati Mahajan Shedha & Ms.Swati, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC, Mr.Ruchir Ranjan Rai & Mr.Siddharth Singh, Advocates with Col.Kishan Singh, Jt.Director, DGQA CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER1604.2018 W.P.(C) 9233/2016 1. The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing the decision of the respondent No.1/Ministry of Defence, Union of India and the respondent No.2/Director General Quality Assurance (DGQA), declining to grant him permanent secondment in the Quality Assessment Selection Board (QASB) (01) 2016, held on 17.02.2016. He further seeks directions to the respondents to examine his candidature for permanent secondment, in terms W.P.(C) 9233/2016 Page 1 of 11 of the O.M. dated 12.05.2011, issued by the respondent No.1/Mini...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018

Arya Kariyatil Chendakera vs.central Board of Secondary Education & An ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision : April 16, 2018 LPA7052017 & CM APPL. 39803/2017 ARYA KARIYATIL CHENDAKERA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Swastik Singh and Mr. Atul versus Singh, Advs. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Thomas, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.This Letter Patent Appeal has come to be preferred assailing the order dated 06.09.2017 passed by the ld. Single Judge dismissing WP(C) 7873/2017 filed by the appellant seeking correction(s)/amendment(s) in her name as also in the names of her mother and the father in the records of the respondents and the class X Grade Sheet cum Certificate of Performance, hereafter "the subject document" dated 28.05.2016 issued by the first respondent, hereafter "CBSE". LPA7052017 Page 1 of 7 2. It is the case of the appellant that she was a student of the 2nd r...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2018