Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Nanda vs.renu Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~7 & 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"16th April, 2018 + CM(M) 118/2016 and CM44072016 RAKESH NANDA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.D. Itorora, Advocate versus RENU GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Pahuja, Advocate + RC.REV. 104/2016 and CM53662016 and 19592/2016 RAKESH NANDA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.D. Itorora, Advocate versus RENU GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Pahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner concededly is a tenant in occupation of the premises described as one shop at ground floor bearing shop no.3875, Roshanara Road, Delhi-110 007 in terms of the tenancy created by late Sh. Krishan Avtar Gupta, the original owner, during his lifetime. The respondent indisputably is the daughter of the said late Sh. Krishan Avtar Gupta, she being an ordinary resident of Sohna in District CM(M) 118/2016 & RCR10416 Page 1 of 6 Gurgaon, Haryana. The respondent had filed eviction case (E- 499/2...
Mohd. Nadim vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~R-20 & 21. * + % CRL.A. 977/2013 MOHD NADIM STATE % CRL.A. 632/2013 MOHD. HAIDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 04.2018 Jivesh Kumar Tiwari & ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ms.Suman Chauhan, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumer Sethi & Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. ..... Respondent STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. TEJI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The aforesaid two appeals have been preferred by the appellants named above to assail their respective conviction by the Trial Court under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC. The appellant Mohd. Nadim has also Crl.A. Nos.977/2013 & 632/2013 Page 1 of 16 assailed his conviction under Section 25/ 27 of the Arms Act. Whereas the appellant Mohd. Nadim stands sentenced to life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine to ...
M/S Pentax Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Techno Fab Engineering Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.187/2018 + % M/S PENTAX ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. 16th April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kishore M. Gajaria and Ms. Namrata Chadha, Advocates. versus M/S TECHNO FAB ENGINEERING LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.6391/2018 (delay of 190 days in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application delay in re-filing is condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM No.6392/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.187/2018 and CM No.14263/2018 (U/o XLI Rule 27 CPC filed by the appellant) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit RFA No.187/2018 Page 1 of 7 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 18.4.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 3,...
Anshul Malik vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :16. h APRIL, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 812/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.6704/2018 ANSHUL MALIK Through : Mr.Anshuman Animesh, Advocate with Mr.Nipun Katyal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP. STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG ..... Respondent + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail u/s 438 Cr.P.C.in case FIR No.1219/2017 registered under SectionsIPC at Police Station Vijay Vihar. Status report is not on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.... Petitioners counsel urged that false allegations have been levelled against the petitioner by the prosecutrix to extort money. He further contended that there is huge delay in lodging the FIR by the prosecutrix. During this period, attempt was made by the prosecutrix through her counsel to extract money from him to settle the issue. Transcript of the conversation with the counsel has been plac...
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs.pawan Sehgal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 16, 2018 MAC.APP. 384/2015 & CM76292015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K Ray and Ms. Neetika Chaturvedi, Advocates versus PAWAN SEHGAL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Garg and Ms. Pankhi Harmilapi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, West-01, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) vide impugned Award of 19th January, 2015 grants compensation of `47,81,187/- to first respondent, who was grievously injured in a vehicular accident on 29th April, 2010. The facts, as noted in impugned Award, are as under: - Brief facts of the case of petitioner is that on 29/04/2010 at about 6.15 a.m. was travelling in his Car bearing No.HR-01S7833 and when he reached at near Metro Station, Tilak Nagar, Delhi and when the petitioner opened the door of his car to came out, suddenly the MAC.APP. 384/2015 Page 1 of 5 offending vehicl...
Bharti Axa General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.risalo Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~7 * % + MAC.APP. 272/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h April, 2018 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Ms.Arunima Dwivedi, Ms.Preeti, ..... Appellant Advocates. versus RISALO DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manish Maini, Ms.hreeshika Bhargav, Advocates for respondents no.1 to 8 along with respondents no.1 and 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.16,55,610/- has been awarded to respondents no.1 to 8.2. The accident dated 04th April, 2014 resulted in the death of Randhir Singh. The deceased was aged 66 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his widow, one son and six married daughters who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was an ex- MAC. APP. 272/2017 Page 1 of 5 serviceman getting a pension of Rs.16,372/- per month and he was doing agricultural activities an...
Jaipal Singh vs.the Land Acquisition Collector (District North-West)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4613/2015 JAIPAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (DISTRICT NORTH- WEST) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Singh, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Ms.Niharika Ahluwalia and Ms.Ananthka Singh, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondent/LAC to pay interest on delayed payment for the period 23.05.2014 (wrongly typed as 23.04.2014 in the prayer clause) to 31.12.2014 on the interest amount payable to the petitioner i.e. Rs.40,26,441/- in terms of the judgment dated 24.04.2014 passed in Writ Petition (Civil) No.71/2014, titled as Jaipal Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. 2. The necessa...
Mazhar Saleem Chandroth (Minor) Thr. Saleem Chandroth (Father and Natu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision : April 16, 2018 LPA3152017 & CM APPL. 16091/2017 & 17688/2017 MAZHAR SALEEM CHANDROTH (MINOR) THR. SALEEM CHANDROTH (FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN) Through Mr.Chandrachur Bhattacharyya, versus ..... Appellant Adv. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is preferred assailing the judgment dated 12.04.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby, a petition filed by the appellant under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India purportedly seeking direction for correction in the name from "Mazhar Chandroth" to "Mazhar Saleem Chandroth" in the record of the respondent - CBSE and re-issuance of the marks-list and transfer certificate, was dismissed. LPA3152017 Page 1 of 10 2. Concisely, the facts relevant to the subject are that for the acade...
Raju Chhaka vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~2 to 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1025/2016 MAHENDER @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1138/2016 ..... Respondent RAJU CHHAKA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. STATE RAJU BHAJJE STATE ARJUN STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1139/2016 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1140/2016 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1141/2016 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Page 1 of 19 + + + + + MOHD. RAJA CRL.A. 1025/2016 & connected matters CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR STATE Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Introduction JUDGMENT1604 .2018 1. A shocking incident of gang rape of a Danish touri...
Ajay Kumar Sinha vs.indraprastha Power Generation Company Limited & Pr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 16, 2018 W.P.(C) 2997/2016 & CM125792016 W.P.(C) 4072/2016 & CM171162016 W.P.(C) 4649/2016 W.P.(C) 7270/2016 & CM299362016 AJAY KUMAR SINHA GOPAL SINGH YAMUNA PRASAD VP SINGH Versus Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioners INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED & PRAGATI POWER CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Vatsa and Ms. Mumari Alka, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners in the above-captioned four petitions seek antedating of their promotion on the post of Deputy Manager (Technical). Learned W.P.(C) 2997/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 7 counsel for petitioners submits that Annual Performance Appraisal Report (hereinafter referred to as APAR) of petitioner-Ajay Kumar of the year 2004-05 was reviewed in the year 2015 from Average to Good and so, petitioner has to be promoted from the year 2008 and not from the yea...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »