Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 13 2018

Dr Pawan Lal & Another vs.state & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 5/2013 DR PAWAN LAL & ANOTHER Through ........ Petitioners Mr. Anil Gera with Mr. Rakesh Chaudhry, Advocates STATE & ORS versus Through Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS R-3 to 5. Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 4937/2018 Present application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 4 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure consequent upon the demise of Respondent No.2, Pandit Dwarka Nath Shastri. Keeping in view the averments in the application and the fact that all the legal representatives of respondent No.2 are already on record, the present application is allowed and the amended memo of parties is taken on record. I.A. 4983/2018 Present application has been filed under Order XXXII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for appointment of TEST.CAS.05/2013 Page 1 of 9 guardian of respondent No.8, Sonia Shar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Uday Shanker Goela vs.shyam Shanker Goela Through Lrs

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~2 & 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th April, 2018 + C.R.P. 122/2012 & CM No.5125/2014 + SHYAM SHANKAR GOELA THROUGH RAJIV GOELA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anish Dayal, Ms. Anjali Agarwal & Ms. Rupam Sharma, Advs. versus UDAY SHANKER GOELA Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. ..... Respondent C.R.P. 150/2012 & CM N. 8981/2013 UDAY SHANKER GOELA Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus SHYAM SHANKER GOELA THROUGH LRs....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anish Dayal, Ms. Anjali Agarwal & Ms. Rupam Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) These two revision petitions relate to the order dated 01.06.2012 passed by the Additional District Judge, as the executing court in execution proceedings registered as execution case No.47/2010. The C.R.P.Nos.122, 1Page 1 of 6 first captioned petition was filed by the party which was entitled under a compromise decree recorded on 26.03.2010 to purchase 50% share in the subject property i.e. pr...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Ranbir Singh & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Mahipal (Deceased) Thr. Lrs vs.union of India & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Vidhi Awasthi vs.union of India & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 13, 2018 W.P.(C) 3652/2018 & CMs 14477-78/2018 + * 1. VIDHI AWASTHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh, Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh and Mr. Ravish Singh, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jaswant Rai Aggarwal and Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 27th March, 2018 (Annexure P-32) declines appointment on the post of Stenographer on compassionate grounds to petitioner on account of non-availability of post of Stenographer, which is a group B post.2. Once appointment has been made on compassionate ground, then without a show-cause notice, appointment cannot be discontinued. It is so said in view of Office Memorandum of 16th January, 2013 (Annexure P- 8). Clause 17 of the aforesaid O.M. reads as under: - TERMINATION OF SERVICE The compassionate appointments can be terminated on the ground of nonco...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Anil Aneja vs.rajiv Kumar & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :15. h DECEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :13. h APRIL, 2018 ANIL ANEJA RSA3362016 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Madan Lal Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Varun Nischal, Advocate. versus RAJIV KUMAR & ORS Through : Mr.Ajay K.Gupta, Advocate for R2. Mr.Kush Sharma, Advocate for R3/DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.1. Present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellant Anil Aneja to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 04.07.2016 of learned Addl. District Judge in RCA No.10/2015 whereby findings of the learned Trial Court vide judgment dated 21.01.2015 in Suit No.87/2014 dismissing it under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC were endorsed. The appeal is contested by the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The appellant had filed a suit for declaration, permanent, mandatory injunction as well as for specific performance. RSA3362016 Pag...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Sreelata Chaudhuri vs.lt Col(retd) Mahajit Chaudhuri & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~1 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI5 Date of Order:13. h April, 2018 + EX.P.197/2011 SREELATA CHAUDHURI ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr.P.K. Agrawal, Ms. Mercy Hussain and Ms. Tanmaya Sharma, Advocates versus LT COL (RETD) MAHAJIT CHAUDHURI & ORS ..... Judgment Debtors Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for Judgment Debtor no.1. Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma and Ms. Suman, Advocates for Judgment Debtor no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) E.A.(OS).351/2014 in EX.P.197/2011 1. This is an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for directions and for modification of the orders dated 24.01.2014 and 13.03.2014 filed by the applicant/decree holder Sreelata Chaudhuri.2. Mr. Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicant/decree holder submits that when the order dated 24.01.2014 was passed, he was not present in Court and his appearance has been incorrectly marked. He further submits that, in fact, his associate had ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Jai Kumar Jain vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Santosh Kumar Jain vs.mehtab Singh Jain & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h April, 2018 CS(OS) 3139/1991 SANTOSH KUMAR JAIN Through: Plaintiff-in-person. ..... Plaintiff Versus MEHTAB SINGH JAIN & ORS Through: None. ..... Defendants AND CS(OS) 3371/1992 SANTOSH KUMAR JAIN Through: Plaintiff-in-person. .... Plaintiff KIRAN JAIN & ORS. Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Adv. for D-9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CS(OS) No.3139/1991 1. The sole plaintiff instituted this suit for partition of 1/6th share claimed by the plaintiff in (i) 7/23, Makhan Lal Street, Darya Ganj, New Delhi; (ii) 1/4th share in property no.1213 to 1216, Chandni Chowk, Delhi (sold by defendant no.1 for Rs.2,00,000/-); (iii) 1/5th share in property bearing no.301, Dariba Kalan, Delhi; (iv) property no.302 to CS(OS) No.3139/1991 & CS(OS) No.3371/1992 Page 1 of 21 305, Dariba Kalan, Delhi; (v) half portion of property no.279/301, Dariba Kalan; and, (vi) plot at Rangmahal Co-operative Socie...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2018

Vinod Kumar & Anr. Vs.asha Devi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-13-2018

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :8. h February, 2018 Date of decision :13th April, 2018 VINOD KUMAR & ANR. RFA4762015 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocate (M- 9990669208, 9810295666). versus ASHA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Rani Mehta, Respondent. (M- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH981859129). Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 Smt. Maya Devi was the lessee of property bearing no 29/3, Ashok Nagar, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi measuring 100 sq. (hereinafter, suit property). She was allotted this property by lease deed dated 17th April, 1967. The term of the lease is 99 years commencing from 16th July, 1957 issued by the President of India. Smt. Maya Devi had two sons Sh. Om Parkash and Sh. Ved Parkash; and two daughters Smt. Kamlesh Malhotra and Smt. Sumitra Sehgal.2. The present suit is filed by the Appellants/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Plaintiffs) who are the heirs of Sh. Om Parkash i.e. Sh. Vinod Kumar and Sh. Rajinder Kumar agai...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.