Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pr Commissioner of Income Tax vs.chryscapital Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 16.4.2018 + ITA3462018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus ........ Appellant CHRYSCAPITAL LTD. .. ... Respondent + ITA3492018 PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ....... Appellant versus MIS CHRYS CAPITAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... RESPONDENTPresent : Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing counsel for appellant. Mr.Vikas Shrivastava, Mr.Mayank Ms.Kanika Jain, Advocates. Aggarwal and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (Open Court) 1.2. Appeals are dismissed. For reasons, the judgment dated 16.4.2018 in ITA6342017 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J A. K. CHAWLA, J APRIL16 2018/ndn...
Mahender @ Ganja vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~2 to 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1025/2016 MAHENDER @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1138/2016 ..... Respondent RAJU CHHAKA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. STATE RAJU BHAJJE STATE ARJUN STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1139/2016 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1140/2016 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1141/2016 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Page 1 of 19 + + + + + MOHD. RAJA CRL.A. 1025/2016 & connected matters CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR STATE Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Introduction JUDGMENT1604 .2018 1. A shocking incident of gang rape of a Danish touri...
Archana Gaur & Anr vs.sunny Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~4,5 and 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"16th April, 2018 + CM(M) 705/2015 and CM137442015 and 1773/2016 + + ARCHANA GAUR & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Prem Kumar and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates Versus SUNNY GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv. CM(M) 155/2016 and CM57002016 ARCHANA GAUR & ANR ........ Petitioners Kumar, Advocates Through: Mr. Prem Kumar and Mr. Rakesh Versus SUNNY GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv. TR.P.(C.) 4/2016 and CM10312016 ARCHANA GAUR & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Prem Kumar and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates Versus SUNNY GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA CM(M) 705/2015 and conn. Page 1 of 5 ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions arise out of the proceedings relating to civil suit (suit no.967/2014) which was filed by the petitioners against the respondent, it being presently pending in the court of the Civil Judge- 05...
Ganesh Sagar Dimbar vs.presidents Secretariat and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 16, 2018 W.P.(C) 3721/2018 & CMs. 14729-30/2018 GANESH SAGAR DIMBAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Milan Laskar and Mr. Parvez Dabas, Advocates versus PRESIDENTS SECRETARIAT AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner claims to have applied for the post of Mali in first respondents Secretariat in the OBC category. As per result of Online Examination held on 19th March, 2017 for the post of Mali Grade-III in the Work-Charged Establishment of Presidents Gardens under Presidents Secretariat, New Delhi/ Hyderbad/ Shimla (Annexure P/5), the last candidate, who was selected in the OBC category, had secured 30 marks.2. Learned counsel for petitioner draws attention of this Court to RTI Reply of 11th July, 2017, which reveals that petitioner had secured 31 marks in the said examination and his position in the mer...
Pr Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs.m/s Chrys Capital Invesment Advisor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~9, 11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 16.4.2018 + ITA6342017 PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ...... Appellant versus M/S CHRYS CAPITAL INVESMENT ADVISORS PVT LTD ....... Respondent + ITA3462018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ........ Appellant versus CHRYSCAPITAL LTD. .. ... Respondent + ITA3492018 PRO COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2 ....... Appellant versus MIS CHRYS CAPITAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... RESPONDENTPresent : Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing counsel for appellant. Mr.Vikas Shrivastava, Mr.Mayank Aggarwal and Ms.Kanika Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (Open Court) 1 Revenues appeal is under Section 260A with respect to inclusion of Brescon Corporate Advisors Limited as a comparable for the purposes of ITA6342017 & connected appeals Page 1 of 6 ALP determination under Section 92CA of the Income Tax Act. It is contended that neither before t...
Kishan Lal vs.rk Associates and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"16th April, 2018 + C.R.P. 100/2011 and CM133702018 and 14138/2011 KISHAN LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate versus RK ASSOCIATES AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hemant Malhotra, K.J.S. Kalra and Mr. Pankaj Malhotra, Advs. for R-1. Mr. P.D Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first respondent had instituted the suit (CS no.305/2009) against the petitioner (impleaded as the first defendant) alleging wrongful dis-possession from the subject property described as plot admeasuring 600 sq. yds. forming part of Khasra no.75 (private no.87/4) situate in the revenue estate of Village Zamrudpur, Delhi. By the said suit, the first respondent (plaintiff) prayed for recovery of possession, permanent injunction and mesne profits from the petitioner (the defendant). On the application moved by M/s. DLF Universal Ltd. under Order 1 Rule 1...
Mohd. Haider vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~R-20 & 21. * + % CRL.A. 977/2013 MOHD NADIM STATE % CRL.A. 632/2013 MOHD. HAIDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 04.2018 Jivesh Kumar Tiwari & ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ms.Suman Chauhan, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumer Sethi & Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. ..... Respondent STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. TEJI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The aforesaid two appeals have been preferred by the appellants named above to assail their respective conviction by the Trial Court under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC. The appellant Mohd. Nadim has also Crl.A. Nos.977/2013 & 632/2013 Page 1 of 16 assailed his conviction under Section 25/ 27 of the Arms Act. Whereas the appellant Mohd. Nadim stands sentenced to life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine to ...
Bhure Lal vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Chhattar Singh vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + L.A. APP. 672/2011 TEJ PRATAP SINGH Reserved on:5. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:13. h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepmala, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.117/2013 RANBIR SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for UOI/R-1. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocates for DDA. L.A. APP.370/2014 BHURE LAL Through: Mr. S.S.Gulia, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant % L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected Page 1 of 23 JAI KUMAR JAIN L.A. APP No.672/2011+Connected UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESP...
Arvind Kumar Sharma vs.ircon International Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-13-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 13, 2018 W.P.(C) 3579/2018 & C.M. 14157/2018 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anisha Upadhyay & Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advocates Versus IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD. Through: Nemo. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Antedating of promotion was sought by petitioner while assailing the gradings for the years 2007-08 upto 2011-12. In the first round of litigation, respondent was directed to consider petitioners Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs), which had the effect on petitioners promotion claimed from 1st July, 2010. The consideration of petitioners ACRs has to be in light of representations made by him.2. Impugned order of 1st August, 2017 (Annexure P-29 colly) reveals that petitioners Representation of 3rd November, 2016 (Annexure P-28 colly) has been considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee in the year 2013 for petitioners promot...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »