Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Universal Sompo Gen Ins Co Ltd vs.ravinder Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
Date of Decision:16. h April, 2018 Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Advocate ..... Appellant IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~8 * % + MAC.APP. 486/2017 and C.M. Appl. 19864/2017 UNIVERSAL SOMPO GEN INS CO LTD RAVINDER KUMAR versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Irfan Ghayas and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.12,43,000/- has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. On 27th March, 2010, respondent No.1 was standing along with his friend with his motorcycle parked on the left side of the road when he was hit by Maruti car from behind which resulted in grievous injuries to respondent No.1.3. Respondent No.1 was taken to Satyawadi Raja Harish Chandra Hospital where his MLC was prepared. He was thereafter taken to LNJP Hospital and then shifted to Sant Parmanand Hospital, Civil Lines, Delhi, where he remained admitted from 28th March, 2010 to 23r...
Asha Gupta vs.inder Singhal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ASHA GUPTA RFA No.317/2018 16th April, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mohd. Shariq and Mr. Wasim Alam, Advocates. versus INDER SINGHAL & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.14616/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.317/2018 & CM No.14615/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.2 in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 6.1.2018 whereby the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of Rs.18,10,000/- along RFA No.317/2018 Page 1 of 6 with interest at 9% per annum by applying Order XII Rule 6 CPC i.e judgment on admission.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent no.1/plaintiff filed the subject suit against three defendants. Defendant no.1 is the partnership firm M/s ...
Morepen Laboratories Limited vs.m/s East West Pharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 04.2018 + RFA (OS) (COMM) 13/2017 MOREPEN LABORATORIES LIMITED Through: Mr. Naman Joshi and versus Ms. Avshreya Rudy, Advs. ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Ms. Sonakshi Malhan and Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Advs. Through: Mr. T. Srinivas Murthy, M/S EAST WEST PHARMA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.1. The appellant (hereafter 'Morepen') is aggrieved by a judgment and orders that partly allowed its suit for permanent injunction, but denied the claim for damages.2. The facts relevant to the appeal are that Morepen had instituted a suit against the respondent (hereafter 'East West') seeking reliefs of permanent injunctions, rendition of accounts and directions to handover all goods, packaging strip, unfinished products etc. bearing the trademark 'DOM' as also handover all plates, blocks, moulds, negative, duplicating equipments or other device used or to be ...
Mohd. Raja vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~2 to 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1025/2016 MAHENDER @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1138/2016 ..... Respondent RAJU CHHAKA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. STATE RAJU BHAJJE STATE ARJUN STATE versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1139/2016 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1140/2016 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State CRL.A. 1141/2016 ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Page 1 of 19 + + + + + MOHD. RAJA CRL.A. 1025/2016 & connected matters CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR STATE Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Introduction JUDGMENT1604 .2018 1. A shocking incident of gang rape of a Danish touri...
V P Singh vs.indraprastha Power Generation Company Limited & Pragati P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 16, 2018 W.P.(C) 2997/2016 & CM125792016 W.P.(C) 4072/2016 & CM171162016 W.P.(C) 4649/2016 W.P.(C) 7270/2016 & CM299362016 AJAY KUMAR SINHA GOPAL SINGH YAMUNA PRASAD VP SINGH Versus Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioners INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED & PRAGATI POWER CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Vatsa and Ms. Mumari Alka, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners in the above-captioned four petitions seek antedating of their promotion on the post of Deputy Manager (Technical). Learned W.P.(C) 2997/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 7 counsel for petitioners submits that Annual Performance Appraisal Report (hereinafter referred to as APAR) of petitioner-Ajay Kumar of the year 2004-05 was reviewed in the year 2015 from Average to Good and so, petitioner has to be promoted from the year 2008 and not from the yea...
Balister & Ors vs.samay Singh & Ors (The United India Insuarece Comapn ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h April, 2018 $~32 * % + MAC.APP. 1030/2017 BALISTER & ORS Through: Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Mr.Rahul ..... Appellants Mohod, Advocates Versus SAMAY SINGH & ORS (THE UNITED INDIA INSUARECE COMAPNY LTD )........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for for Ms.Suman Bagga, Advocate respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.8,93,472/- has been awarded to them.2. The accident dated 09th January, 2017 resulted in death of Ravi. The deceased was 20 years of age and was doing the business of supplying of sweets. It was claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.20,000/- per month. However, the Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.9,724/-, deducted 1/2nd towards his personal expenses and applied the MAC. APP. 1030/2017 Page 1 of 4 multiplier of 13 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs.7,58,472/-. T...
M L Lakhanpal vs.darshan Lal and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:16. h April, 2018 + FAO (OS) (COMM) 55/2018 M L LAKHANPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arvind Nayar, Senior Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh and Mr.Ashish Anshuman, Advocates. versus DARSHAN LAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to the Act). The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 22.01.2018 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court by which objections to the award have been dismissed.2. At the outset, we may note that the appellant herein was instrumental in approaching this Court for appointment of an Arbitrator for FAO (OS) (COMM) No.55/2018 Page 1 of 15 resolution of dispu...
K vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1081/2018 Judgment delivered on:16. 04.2018 K ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr. Mandeep S. Vinaik, Mr. Manish Lamba, Mr. Sanklap Sangar and Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advs. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Addl. PP for the State Mr. Rajiv Khosla, Tajinder Singh and Mr. Sarvesh Tyagi, Advs. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1604.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 05.02.2018 passed by the trial court granting anticipatory bail to respondent No.2.2. The trial court by the impugned order inter alia held as under:-"CRL.M.C. 1081/2018 Page 1 of 3 During arguments, Id. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a student of MBA and is not previously involved in any criminal case and to show his bonafide towards the society, is offering himself to ...
Om Prakash vs.rajiv Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :16. h April, 2018 + RFA5852016 OM PRAKASH Through: Mr. ..... Appellant Shwetank Sailakwal, versus Advocate.(M:9990803222) RAJIV KUMAR Through: Mr. Sourabh Leekha, Mr. Kapil Dua Gandhi, ..... Respondent K. and Mr. Advocates.(M:9811590282) D. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is an appeal arising out of the impugned judgment/decree dated 23rd March, 2016 whereby the suit for recovery filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) was decreed in the following terms: the defendant In view of my above findings on the issues, the suit of plaintiff is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against for a sum of Rs.3,86,000/- alongwith cost of the suit and interest pendentelite and future @ 8% p.a. till the actual realization of the amount. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room. 2. The case of the Plaintiff is that a sum of Rs.2 Lakhs was given as a...
Dinesh Kothari & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
$~8 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 692/2016 & CM No.2826/2016 % Date of decision :16. h April, 2018 DINESH KOTHARI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Ms. Sanjana Srikumar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Ms. Kritika Gupta, Advs.for R-1 to 4 Mr. C. Mukund, Mr. M.B. Elakkunanan and Ms. Geethika Mitta, Advs. for R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition was filed on 28th November, 2015 complaining of violations of the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) and the FDI Policies framed by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) (respondent no.2 herein) seeking the following prayers : 1. Conduct an inquiry/investigation into the affairs and transactions of all FDI recipient companies/websites regarding violation indulged in by them through various mechanisms directly W.P.(C)N...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »