Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arvind Singh vs.kusum Lata Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ 12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"17th April, 2018 + RC. REV. 78/2015 and CM APPL.2932/2015 (stay) ARVIND SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Adarsh Kumar Gupta, Advocate versus KUSUM LATA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sagar Saxena, & Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner admittedly is a tenant in a portion described as one room at the first floor of the property bearing No.C-586, Gali No.12, Majlis Park, Delhi-110 033 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted premises). The respondent had instituted a case for eviction (E. No.02/2011) on 06.01.2011 against him on the ground of bona fide need under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The eviction case was contested by the petitioner (the tenant) on various grounds, the prime plea being that the respondent (landlady), a widow, who does not have any children of her own, has available to her suffici...
Pappu Kumar & Kallu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~19 & 20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 154/2014 Judgment reserved on 6th April, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 17th April, 2018. PAPPU KUMAR & KALLU STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rajni Singh, Adv. Versus Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for ..... Respondent AND State. CRL. A. 558/2016 DEEPAK SHARMA STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rajni Singh, Adv. Versus Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for ..... Respondent State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.1. Vide judgment dated 5th September, 2013 of the trial court appellant- Pappu Kumar @ Kallu has been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the Act, for short); whereas appellant-Deepak Sharma has been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Act. By the order on sentence dated 3rd October, 2013, Crl. A. 154/2014 & Crl. A. 558/2016 Page 1 of 11 Pappu Kumar @ Kallu has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 12 years with fine of `...
Muskan & Others vs.anil Chawla & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 167/2015 MUSKAN & OTHERS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.R.K.Burman, Advocate. versus ANIL CHAWLA & OTHERS Through ..... Defendants Defendant no.1 in person. Mr. Joby P.Varghese with Ms.Vaishai and Mr. Aby P.Varghese, Advocates for the applicant-bank. % Date of Decision:17. h April, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A.No.3581/2018 1. Present application has been filed under Order I Rule 10 CPC by the applicant-Federal Bank Ltd. for its impleadment.2. In the present application, it has been stated that the suit property had been mortgaged with the applicant-Bank by deposit of title deeds. It is further stated that though the applicant-Bank had initiated proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and taken over possession, yet the parties were CS (OS) 167/2015 Page 1 of 4 creating obstacles in the sale of the suit property by referring to the present proceedings.3. In the opinion of this Court, the SARFAESI ...
Ritu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ * 5 to 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.1331 /2014 Date of judgment:17. h April, 2018 SANJAY @ ARUN .....Appellant Through:Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State + AJAY @ RINKU CRL.A.1334 /2014 .....Appellant Through:Mr.K. Singhal and Mr Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE + VIKRAMJEET SINGH .....Appellant Through:Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms Raveena Tandon, Advocates. CRL.A.1358 /2014 versus STATE + RITU .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CRL.A.1565 /2014 .....Appellant Crl.A.1331/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 18 Through:Mr. Sumeet Verma with Ms Preeti Jakhar, Advocates. versus ...Respondents CRL.A.1132 /2015 Through: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI . .....Appellant SALAUDD...
Air Traffic Controllers Guild (India) vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3731/2018 1. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS GUILD (INDIA) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurabyh S. Sinha & Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the first round of litigation, respondent-Airport Authority of India (AAI) was directed to resolve the burning issue of allocation of 449 posts in the year 2016, which was approved by AAI Board in December, 2013.... Petitioners Representation of 6th February, 2017 on the aspect of filling up of 449 posts, stands decided by respondent-AAI vide impugned order of 22nd June, 2017 (Annexure P-1) passed by the General Manager (Human Resource).2. As per the impugned order, sanctioned strength of Air Traffic Control Officers (ATcOs) across various grades has already reached the ...
Lalit Singh Negi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2478/2016 LALIT SINGH NEGI STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr Gurmehar Singh Sistani and Mr Samit Khosla with petitioner in person. Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State. SI Satish Kumar, PS Ambedkar Nagar. Mr Vinod Dubey, Advocate for complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1704.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.445/2016 under Sections 498A/406/5IPC, Police Station Ambedkar Nagar.2. Parties were referred to Mediation; however, no settlement could be arrived at.... Petitioner was granted interim protection on 02.12.2016 subject to joining investigation.3. As per the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petitioner did join investigation, as and when he was called upon to do so. BAIL APPLN. 2478/2016 Page 1 of 2 4. On 0...
M/S Guptajee Engineers & Anr vs.motor Industries Co Ltd (Mico)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~35 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 65/2018 & & CM Nos.14746-47/2018 % Date of decision :17. h April, 2018 M/S GUPTAJEE ENGINEERS & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Mr. Deepak Jaiswal and Mr. Avi Pandey, Advs. versus MOTOR INDUSTRIES CO LTD (MICO) Through : Mr. Siddharth Bawa and ..... Respondent Mr. Shyamal Anand, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The present appeal has been filed assailing an order dated 8th February, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in CS(OS) No.135/2006 Motor Industries Co. Ltd. v. M/s Guptajee Engineers & Ors. By way of the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has rejected OA No.163/2017 which had been filed by the appellants (defendant nos. 1 & 2 in the suit) assailing an order dated 9th FAO(OS)No.65/2018 Page 1 of 4 November, 2017 of the Joint Registrar. It appears that the respondent...
Ajay @ Rinku vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ * 5 to 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.1331 /2014 Date of judgment:17. h April, 2018 SANJAY @ ARUN .....Appellant Through:Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State + AJAY @ RINKU CRL.A.1334 /2014 .....Appellant Through:Mr.K. Singhal and Mr Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE + VIKRAMJEET SINGH .....Appellant Through:Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms Raveena Tandon, Advocates. CRL.A.1358 /2014 versus STATE + RITU .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CRL.A.1565 /2014 .....Appellant Crl.A.1331/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 18 Through:Mr. Sumeet Verma with Ms Preeti Jakhar, Advocates. versus ...Respondents CRL.A.1132 /2015 Through: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI . .....Appellant SALAUDD...
Yogesh Kumar Malik vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 01.2018 Pronounced on:17. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 559/2016, CM APPL. 2316-2317 & 26412/2016 YOGESH KUMAR MALIK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Advocate with Mrs. Sija Nair Pal, Advocate. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. Respondents versus Through: Ms. Mala Narayan and Ms. Neha Dawar, Advocates for R Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, Advocate for UOI with Mr. Kavindra Gill, Advocate. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Prefactory Facts 1. This writ petition raises a very interesting question, which is, when does registration of a document take effect?. The documents in issue in the instant case are two separate lease deeds of even date i.e., 9.10.2013. They were presented for registration before the concerned Sub Registrar on 10.10.2013, while the certificate of registration under Section 60 of the Registration Act, 1908 (in short 1908 Act) was issued on 14.10.2013. W.P.(C) 559/2016 Page 1 2. Th...
Hanif Khan vs.the Central Civil Services Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6445/2016 1. HANIF KHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Kapoor & Ms. Rekha Giri, Advocates Versus THE CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES BOARD .... Respondent Through: Mr. A.P. Sahay, Central Government Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Creation of post of Mali and regularization of petitioners service ORDER (ORAL) as Mali, is sought in this petition while claiming parity with Krishna Mohan Kumar Singh. Grant of same pay scale is also sought by petitioner, who claims that he is working as Mali with respondent since 6th October, 1995.2. At the outset, petitioners counsel places reliance upon a decision of 28th August, 2006, of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 782/1996 Raj Kishore Singh & Ors. Vs. The Central Civil Services Board (Annexure P-2) to seek the relief claimed in this petition.3. Vide aforesaid order of 28th August, 2006 (Annexure P-2), Krishna Mohan Kumar Singh was gran...