Lalit Singh Negi vs.state

Lalit Singh Negi vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 17, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1214271

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1214271
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Apr 17, 2018
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lalit Singh Negi

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....public prosecutor, the petitioner did join investigation, as and when he was called upon to do so. bail appln. 2478/2016 page 1 of 2 4. on 06.09.2017, this court had recorded the contention of the complainant that she has received part of jewellery from the petitioner in the police station on 15.07.2017 and also a demand draft of rs.70,000/-, however, a plea was raised that the entire jewellery has not been received, to which the petitioner contends that entire jewellery has been returned to the respondent.5. perusal of the record shows that petitioner has made out a case for anticipatory bail. no case is made out for the custodial interrogation of the petitioner. in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho, on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho.6. the petitioner shall not do anything, which shall either prejudice the investigation or any of the prosecution witnesses. the petitioner shall join investigation, as and when so required by the investigating officer.7. 8. the petition is accordingly disposed of. order dasti under signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j april17 2018/‘sn’ bail appln. 2478/2016 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

17. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2478/2016 LALIT SINGH NEGI STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

For the Respondent : : Mr Gurmehar Singh Sistani and Mr Samit Khosla with petitioner in person. Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State. SI Satish Kumar, PS Ambedkar Nagar. Mr Vinod Dubey, Advocate for complainant. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1704.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.445/2016 under Sections 498A/406/5
IPC, Police Station Ambedkar Nagar.

2. Parties were referred to Mediation; however, no settlement could be arrived at.... Petitioner

was granted interim protection on 02.12.2016 subject to joining investigation.

3. As per the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petitioner did join investigation, as and when he was called upon to do so. BAIL APPLN. 2478/2016 Page 1 of 2 4. On 06.09.2017, this Court had recorded the contention of the complainant that she has received part of jewellery from the petitioner in the Police Station on 15.07.2017 and also a demand draft of Rs.70,000/-, however, a plea was raised that the entire jewellery has not been received, to which the petitioner contends that entire jewellery has been returned to the respondent.

5. Perusal of the record shows that petitioner has made out a case for anticipatory bail. No case is made out for the custodial interrogation of the petitioner. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer/SHO, on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer/SHO.

6. The petitioner shall not do anything, which shall either prejudice the investigation or any of the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall join investigation, as and when so required by the Investigating Officer.

7. 8. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J APRIL17 2018/‘Sn’ BAIL APPLN. 2478/2016 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Lalit Singh Negi vs State Same Subject Criminal