Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Soumita Das & Ors vs.s K Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 4452/2015 & C.Ms. 3226/2017, 7770/2017 & 8075/2015 SOUMITA DAS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate .....Respondent With (ii) + CONT.CAS(C) 1323/2016 SOUMITA DAS & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates S K SHARMA Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iii) + W.P.(C) 3639/2015 & C.M. 6486/2015 ANOJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY With Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iv) + CONT.CAS(C) 543/2015 W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & connected petition Page 1 of 9 ANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates SUDHIR BUDAKOTI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate (v) + W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & C.Ms....
Mukesh Kumar vs.ranbir Singh Commissioner East Delhi Municipal Corpora ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~3 & 4 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :17. h April, 2018 + CONT.CAS(C) 768/2017 & CM No.41191/2017 MUKESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. Anshul Garg, Advs. versus RANBIR SINGH COMMISSIONER EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs. for EDMC. Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC with Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Adv. for R-7. + W.P.(C) 8435/2017, CM Nos.43927/2017 & 10882/2018 SH. MUKESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. Anshul Garg, Advs. versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs. for EDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR CONT.CAS(C) 768/2017 & W.P.(C) 8435/2017 Page 1 of 5 JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The writ petition (W.P.(C)No.8435/2017) has been filed ...
Oriental Bank of Commerce Central Accounts Office vs.additional Commis ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 17.4.2018 ITA4152017 & ITA562018 ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajat Navet, Ms Sanya Talwar and Mr Kushagra Pandit, Advs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: versus Ms Vibhooti Malhotra and Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Advs and Mr Puneet Rai, Adv. + ITA4142017 ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE CENTRAL ACCOUNTS OFFICE ..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajat Navet, Ms Sanya Talwar and Mr Kushagra Pandit, Advs versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE -19, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms Vibhooti Malhotra and Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Advs and Mr Puneet Rai, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (Open Court) 1.2. Appeals are allowed. For reasons, the judgment dated 17.4.2018 in ITA1292018 may be referred to. APRIL17 2018/ndn S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J A. K. CHAWLA, J...
Krishan vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:17. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10340/2016 KRISHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta and Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajul Jain, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sumit Rana, Advocate for DSIIDC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land bearing Khasra No.'s 78//8, 9, 10/2, 8min, 10, 90//5, 6, 21, situated in the revenue estate of village Sultanpur Dabas, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referre...
Vijay Kumar Gupta (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Vs.promila Bhagat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ 4 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"17th April, 2018 CM (M) 1096/2016 and CM APPL.Nos.40152/2016, 6494/2018 & CM APPL.14878/2018 VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Advocate versus PROMILA BHAGAT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.C. Dhingra, Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. & Mr. Piyush Kant Roy, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 10.06.2016 passed by the additional district judge (ADJ) on the file of the civil suit (CS No.429/12/87) whereby the application under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) of the respondent plaintiff of the case for amendment of the plaint was allowed, rejecting the objections of the petitioners defendants in the suit. CM (M) 1096/2016 Page 1 of 9 2. The history of the dispute which is the subject matter of the lis in which the imp...
S vs.j
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 750/2017 & CM No.25674/2017 Date of Decision:17. h April, 2018 S J ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Anunaya Mehta, Advocates. versus Through: In person ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 Following important questions of law have arisen for consideration in this petition:-"I. What is the nature of proceedings under Section 26 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as D.V. Act) ?. II. What procedure is to be followed by the Court in adjudicating an application under Section 26 of the D.V. Act ?. III. Whether the Court is bound to follow Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) to adjudicate an application under Section 26 of the D.V. Act ?.2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 28th March, 2017 whereby the Family Court dismissed the petitioners application under CM(M) 750/2017 Page 1 of 33 Order XIV ...
Sanjeev Sharma vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 W.P.(C) 3781/2018 & CM149802018 SANJEEV SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sriram J.Thalapathy and Mr. Pushkin Rajkumar, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief claimed in this petition, petitioner has already filed Representations on 29th February, 2016 (Annexure P-5) and 8th February, 2018 (Annexure P-8). According to petitioners counsel, there is response to the said Representations.2. Despite service of advance notice, none appears on behalf of second respondent.3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to competent authority to effectively consider petitioners Representations (Annexure P-5 & P-8) within a period of four weeks from today and its fate be conveyed to petitioner within a week ther...
Vikramjeet Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ * 5 to 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.1331 /2014 Date of judgment:17. h April, 2018 SANJAY @ ARUN .....Appellant Through:Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State + AJAY @ RINKU CRL.A.1334 /2014 .....Appellant Through:Mr.K. Singhal and Mr Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE + VIKRAMJEET SINGH .....Appellant Through:Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms Raveena Tandon, Advocates. CRL.A.1358 /2014 versus STATE + RITU .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CRL.A.1565 /2014 .....Appellant Crl.A.1331/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 18 Through:Mr. Sumeet Verma with Ms Preeti Jakhar, Advocates. versus ...Respondents CRL.A.1132 /2015 Through: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI . .....Appellant SALAUDD...
Smt. Geeta Kumar vs.management, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee College and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3749/2018 & C.M. No.14848/2018 1. SMT. GEETA KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.K. Singh & Mr. Omprakash Kumar Srivastava, Advocates Versus MANAGEMENT, SHYAMA PRASAD MUKHERJEE COLLEGE AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Prang Newmai & Ms. Slomita Rai, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief sought in this petition, petitioner had made various Representations, which were not responded to. Ultimately, petitioner had sent a Legal / Demand Notice of 6th October, 2015 (Annexure P-31) seeking payment of gratuity and pension.2. According to petitioners counsel, there is no response to Representation of 2nd February, 2015 (Annexure P-30) and aforesaid Legal / Demand Notice of 6th October, 2015 (Annexure P-31).3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to direct respondent-College to effectively respond to Legal...
Sudhir Vats & Ors. Vs.s K Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 4452/2015 & C.Ms. 3226/2017, 7770/2017 & 8075/2015 SOUMITA DAS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate .....Respondent With (ii) + CONT.CAS(C) 1323/2016 SOUMITA DAS & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates S K SHARMA Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iii) + W.P.(C) 3639/2015 & C.M. 6486/2015 ANOJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY With Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iv) + CONT.CAS(C) 543/2015 W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & connected petition Page 1 of 9 ANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates SUDHIR BUDAKOTI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate (v) + W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & C.Ms....
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »