Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sakl Paswan & Anr. Vs.jai Nandan Bhagat & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 664/2013 SAKL PASWAN & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie and Ms. Hreeshikha Bhargav, Advocates Versus JAI NANDAN BHAGAT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Mithlesh Kumar, aged 17 years (borne on 06.03.1992), working as a helper died as a result of injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 18.08.2009 due to negligent driving of vehicle bearing registration no.DL-1LE-1363 (a tractor). An accident claim case (MACT18312/10) was instituted on 12.05.2010 by the appellants, they being the father and mother, respectively of the deceased. The case was contested by the third respondent (insurer) and also by the second respondent (the owner of the tractor).2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 31.01.2013, returned a finding holding the tra...
Arun Kumar Saraf and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3811/2018 Judgment pronounced on:18. April, 2018 ARUN KUMAR SARAF AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Anish Dayal, Ms. Rupam Sharma and Mr. Arjit Pratap Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R-1 & 2 CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Diwakar accepts notice on behalf of official respondents.2. Learned counsel for the respondents says that he does not wish to file a counter affidavit in the matter and that he will argue the matter based on the record presently available with the Court.3. Briefly, the averments made by the petitioners are as follows:3. 1 The respondent no.3 is a joint venture company which has been incorporated by a set of persons originating from India and Russia (hereafter referred as Indian and Russian partners respectively). W.P.(C) 3811/2018 Page 1 of 5 3.2 The respondent no.3 company, as pe...
Babu Lal vs.nirmala Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~ 10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"18th April, 2018 + RC. REV. 268/2015 and CM APPL.10168/2015 (stay) BABU LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Kapur, Advocate with Ms. Chhavi Luthra & Mr. Anmol Kapur, Advocates versus NIRMALA DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The respondent had instituted a case (E. No.858/2014) on 23.05.2013 against the petitioner for eviction on the ground of bona fide need under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in respect of a premises described as shop forming part of ground floor of property bearing No.16/605-E, Tank Road, Bapa Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, as shown in colour red in the site plan filed with the eviction petition.2. The petitioner does not dispute his status vis--vis the subject premises as that of a tenant. On being served with the summons under Section 25-B of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, he filed an applicatio...
Fasih Mahmood vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :17. h APRIL, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 923/2017 ........ Petitioner FASIH MAHMOOD Through : Ms.Nitya Ramakrishnan, Advocate with Ms.Suhasini Sen, Mr.S. Naved, Ms.Sunaina Pihul & Ms.Priyanka Rao, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : Mr.Amit Chadha, APP with Insp.Ravinder Joshi, Special Cell. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner Fasih Mahmood seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.54/2011 registered under Sections 471/489B/489C/120B IPC; Sections 16/18/Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, (in short UAPA); Section 25 Arms Act and Sections 3,4,5 Explosive Substances Act at PS Special Cell, Lodhi Colony. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.... Petitioners counsel urged that the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2012. At present, he is facing trial only for commission of offence ...
Unit Run Canteen Employees Welfare Association (Regd.) vs.union of Ind ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :17. 04.2018 WP(C) 3422/2018 UNIT RUN CANTEEN EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Mohak Bhadana and Mr.Ankush Diwan, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..Respondents Through: Mr.Gaurant Kanth, Central Govt. Standing Counsel with Ms.Eshita Baruah, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) 1. On an advance copy of the writ petition having been served on the respondents, Mr.Gaurang Kanth, learned Central Government Standing Counsel has put in his appearance.2. The impugned order dated 28.08.2017 issued by the Deputy Director, Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, found that the dispute raised by the petitioner with the respondents No.2 and 3 is not a fit case for reference to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, New Delhi (CGIT) for adjudication following the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in R.R.Pillai (dead) through LRs vs. Comman...
Raghubir Chander Duggal vs.central Bank of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3819/2016 & CMs 45006-07/2017 1. RAGHUBIR CHANDER DUGGAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate Versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR Through: Mr. R.S. Mathur, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) This Court vide order of 24th April, 2007, had directed respondent- Bank to release the pensionary benefits to petitioner within six weeks and the said order was unsuccessfully challenged before the Division Bench of this Court and the Supreme Court.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that no interim orders were passed by the Division Bench or Supreme Court and since the pensionary benefits were not released to petitioner till 9th February, 2016 in terms of Disciplinary Authoritys order of 20th February, 2002, therefore, respondent-Bank is liable to pay the interest @15% per annum for delayed release of retiral benefits. Another prayer made in this ...
Anoj Kumar vs.indira Gandhi National Open University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 4452/2015 & C.Ms. 3226/2017, 7770/2017 & 8075/2015 SOUMITA DAS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate .....Respondent With (ii) + CONT.CAS(C) 1323/2016 SOUMITA DAS & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates S K SHARMA Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iii) + W.P.(C) 3639/2015 & C.M. 6486/2015 ANOJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY With Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iv) + CONT.CAS(C) 543/2015 W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & connected petition Page 1 of 9 ANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates SUDHIR BUDAKOTI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate (v) + W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & C.Ms....
Micrographics India vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.320/2018 % MICROGRAPHICS INDIA17h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatin Mongia and Mr. A. Kumar, Advocates. Versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.14845/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.320/2018 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 15.12.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.24,00,512.80/-. Appellant/plaintiff claimed this amount RFA No.320/2018 Page 1 of 11 on account of works done under two contracts for the respondents/defendants being the Transport Department of the Government of National Capital Territory of D...
Sh. Mukesh Kumar vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~3 & 4 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :17. h April, 2018 + CONT.CAS(C) 768/2017 & CM No.41191/2017 MUKESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. Anshul Garg, Advs. versus RANBIR SINGH COMMISSIONER EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs. for EDMC. Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC with Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Adv. for R-7. + W.P.(C) 8435/2017, CM Nos.43927/2017 & 10882/2018 SH. MUKESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. Anshul Garg, Advs. versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs. for EDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR CONT.CAS(C) 768/2017 & W.P.(C) 8435/2017 Page 1 of 5 JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The writ petition (W.P.(C)No.8435/2017) has been filed ...
Raghu Hari Dalmia vs.reserve Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:17. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 3743/2018 & CM Nos.14825-26/2018 RAGHU HARI DALMIA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Prashanto Chadra Sen, Sr. Adv with Mr. Anish Dayal, Mr. S.K. Singh, Mr. Jishnu Chaudhary, Mr. Shivanshu Singh, Ms. Rupam Sharma, Mr. Arjit Pratap Singh and Mr. Ritul Tandon, Advs. versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. H.S. Parihar and Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J (ORAL) CM No.14826/2018 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3743/2018 & CM No.14825/2018 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset, says that respondent no.3 can be deleted from the array of parties. The said request is acceded to. Respondent no.3 is deleted from the array of parties.3. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Arun Aggarwal accepts WP(C)No.3743/2018 Page 1 of 6 notice on behalf of responde...