Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay @ Arun vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ * 5 to 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.1331 /2014 Date of judgment:17. h April, 2018 SANJAY @ ARUN .....Appellant Through:Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State + AJAY @ RINKU CRL.A.1334 /2014 .....Appellant Through:Mr.K. Singhal and Mr Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE + VIKRAMJEET SINGH .....Appellant Through:Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms Raveena Tandon, Advocates. CRL.A.1358 /2014 versus STATE + RITU .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CRL.A.1565 /2014 .....Appellant Crl.A.1331/2014 & connected appeals Page 1 of 18 Through:Mr. Sumeet Verma with Ms Preeti Jakhar, Advocates. versus ...Respondents CRL.A.1132 /2015 Through: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State .... RESPONDENTThrough:Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI . .....Appellant SALAUDD...
Dr. Abdul Sattar vs.jamia Millia Islamia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 W.P.(C) 3782/2018 & CMs 14981-82/2018 DR. ABDUL SATTAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocate Versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Zeba Khair, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief sought in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P- * + 1.22) has been made by petitioner on 5th March, 2018 against impugned order of 16th February, 2018 (Annexure P-1) vide which it has been conveyed to petitioner that he has to retire on 31st October, 2018. According to petitioner, he has to retire at the age of 65 years and not 60 years. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no response to the said Representation (Annexure P-22).2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to respondent-University to consider petitioners Representation of 5th March, 2018 (Annexure P-22) and to ...
Anoj Kumar vs.sudhir Budakoti
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 4452/2015 & C.Ms. 3226/2017, 7770/2017 & 8075/2015 SOUMITA DAS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate .....Respondent With (ii) + CONT.CAS(C) 1323/2016 SOUMITA DAS & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates S K SHARMA Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iii) + W.P.(C) 3639/2015 & C.M. 6486/2015 ANOJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY With Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iv) + CONT.CAS(C) 543/2015 W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & connected petition Page 1 of 9 ANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates SUDHIR BUDAKOTI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate (v) + W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & C.Ms....
Balfour Beatty Group Limited vs.kalindee Rail Nirman (Engineers) Limit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h April, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 158/2018 BALFOUR BEATTY GROUP LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Yashwant Mathur & Mr.Kunal Bahri & Mr.Abhyudai Singh, Advs. versus KALINDEE RAIL NIRMAN (ENGINEERS) LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Dhruv Dewan, Mr.Arjun Pall, Ms.Sheetal Srivastav, Mr.Kostubh Devnani & Ms.Durga Manda, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.5125/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 158/2018 & I.A. No.5124/2018 (Stay) 1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr.Dhruv Dewan, Advocate on behalf of the respondent. He has been heard at length in opposition of the prayer made in the petition.2. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Interim Arbitral Award dated 03.01.2018 passed b...
Naresh Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:17. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10234/2016 NARESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta and Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajul Jain, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sumit Rana, Advocate DSIIDC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land bearing Khasra No.'s 78//21, 22, 23, 79//25, 89//1, 90//11, 12 situated in the revenue estate of village Sultanpur Dabas, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter ...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.geeta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. h April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 385/2017 and C.M. Appl. 15407/2017 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates versus GEETA & ORS Through: Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Rahul Mohod and Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 5 + MAC.APP. 850/2017 GEETA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Mr. Rahul Mohod and Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocates versus U P ROADWAYS (UPSRTC) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant/UPSRTC in MAC. APP. 385/2017 has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.16,90,000/- has been awarded to the claimants. MAC. APP. Nos.385/2017 & 850/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. The accident dated 04th June, 2015 resulted in the death of Ramesh Kumar. The deceased was ...
National Highway Authority of India vs.m/s Madhucon Projects Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 17/2018 Date of decision:17. 04.2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Mr. Debojit versus Borkakati and Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Advocates. M/S MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with ..... Respondent Mr. Pradeep Chhindra and Mr. Suryadeep Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % Caveat No.82/2018 Since the counsel for the respondent/caveator has put in appearance the caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 3886/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 3887/2018 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 93 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. Application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 17/2018 Page 1 of 5 FAO(OS) (COMM) 17/2018 & CM APPL. 3885/2018 (for stay) The appellant/Natio...
Tenzin Rabga vs.ministry of External Affairs & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment decided on:17. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 2572/2018 TENZIN RABGA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Giriraj Subramanium and Mr.Simarpal Singh, Advs. versus MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj and Mr.Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Notice in this petition was issued on 19.03.2018 with the following directions: Issue notice. The petitioners limited grievance is that his identity 1. certificate is not being renewed. According to the petitioner, the identity certificate which has been issued to him, expires on 4.5.2018.2. 2.1 Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate accepts notice for respondents. Mr. Bhardwaj says that he will revert with instructions. 2.2. In case the instructions are given to resist the petition, the respondents will file a counter affidavit before the next date of hearing.3. Renotify the matter on 17.4.2018.2. Mr. Bhardwaj, who app...
Gaurav Dalmia vs.reserve Bank of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:17. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 3764/2018 & CM Nos.14933-34/2018 GAURAV DALMIA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Prashanto Chadra Sen, Sr. Adv with Mr. Anish Dayal, Mr. S.K. Singh, Mr. Jishnu Chaudhary, Mr. Shivanshu Singh, Ms. Rupam Sharma, Mr. Arjit Pratap Singh and Mr. Ritul Tandon, Advs. versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. H.S. Parihar and Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J (ORAL) CM No.14934/2018 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3764/2018 & CM No.14933/2018 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset, says that respondent no.3 can be deleted from the array of parties. The said request is acceded to. Respondent no.3 is deleted from the array of parties.3. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Arun Aggarwal accepts WP(C)No.3764/2018 Page 1 of 6 notice on behalf of respondent n...
Aseem Narain vs.north East Centre for Technology Application and Reach ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 W.P.(C) 6822/2017 & CM283882017 ASEEM NARAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanyat Lodha,Ms. Aakashi Lodha and Mrs. Sanjana Saddy, Advocates Versus NORTH EAST CENTRE FOR TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION AND REACH (NECTAR) AND ORS Through: Mr. Sumit Rajput, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of 31 Memos/Office Orders including the ones pertaining to wrong deduction in petitioners salary to the tune of `3,77,402/- till June, 2017, is sought in this petition.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the said Memos have been already responded to and Representations qua Office Orders/recovery of excess payment due to retrospective revision of petitioners salary, etc., have been already made, but there is no response by the respondents.3. Upon hearing, it is deemed appropriate to permit petitioner to make a concise and composite Representation in respect of all the 31 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »