Skip to content

Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 17 2018

Department of Telecommunications vs.tata Telesrvices Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 4.2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 68/2018, CM APPLN1479314794/2018 & and CAV3252018 DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS ..... Appellant Through Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC. versus TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mansoor Ali, Mr.Nitin Kala, Mr.Jibran Tak, Ms.Chandhi Gher and Ms.Ramya Kutty, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (Open Court) 1 The Department of Telecommunications appeal is against the judgment of the learned Single Judge rejecting its objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter called Act) to the Award of 13th October, 2016 (hereafter called impugned award) made by sole Arbitrator (hereafter called the Tribunal). Pursuant to the New Telecom Policy formulated in 1999 Universal Service Support Policy (USSP) was framed to provide CS(OS)(COMM) 68/2018 Pag...


Apr 17 2018

Sushil Kumar Gupta vs.jindal Charitable Trust

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. h April, 2018 + RFA832017 & CM Nos. 2688/2017 & 2690/2017 SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bhupendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate. (M:9899368377) versus JINDAL CHARITABLE TRUST ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. K. Sharma and Ms. Dezy Gaur, Advocates. (M:9313340162) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal arises out of judgment dated 5th September, 2016 passed by the Trial Court, by which the suit for declaration and re- possession filed in respect of the property bearing no.1/8B, First Floor, Jindal Trust Building, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi 110002 (hereinafter, suit property) was dismissed. The Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter Plaintiff) filed the suit for declaration, re-possession and injunction against Jindal Charitable Trust, Respondent/Defendant (hereinafter Defendant).2. It is the case of the Plaintiff that he entered into the suit property in May, 1981. In para...


Apr 17 2018

Prashun Jain vs.commissioner of Customs (Import & General), New Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

$~21. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CUSAA No.108/2018 Date of decision:17. h April, 2018 PRASHUN JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar and Mr. Pravesh Bahuguna, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT & GENERAL), NEW DELHI .... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Suresh Chaudhary, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Prashun Jain-appellant in this appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (Act, for short) impugns the order dated 7th August, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (Tribunal, for short) in Customs Appeal No.C/51369/2014.2. The impugned order substantially sets aside observations and findings made in the order-in-original dated 31st October, 2013 by CUSAA No.108/2018 Page 1 of 6 deleting penalty of Rs.67,17,015/- under Section 112 of the Act and reduces the penalty imposed under Section 114A...


Apr 17 2018

Saritaha Kumari vs.director General Central Industrial Security Force ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

$~4 * + W.P.(C) 96/2018 SARITAHA KUMARI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr.P.Sureshan, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC with Mr.R.L.Sinha, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER1704.2018 The petitioner has laid a challenge to the order dated 12.11.2016, % 1. passed by the Disciplinary Authority i.e. Assistant Commandant, CISF Unit, IGI Airport whereby she was awarded a penalty of stoppage of one year increment without cumulative effect and the orders dated 01.05.2017 and 27.07.2017, passed by the Appellate Authority i.e. Senior Commandant CISF Unit, IGI Airport and the Revisional Authority i.e. Deputy Inspector General (CASO), CISF Unit, IGI Airport, respectively upholding the penalty imposed on her by the Disciplinary Authority.2. The petitioner was enrolled as a Constable in the CISF in the year 2007. ...


Apr 17 2018

Soumita Das and Ors. Vs.indira Gandhi National Open University

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 17, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 4452/2015 & C.Ms. 3226/2017, 7770/2017 & 8075/2015 SOUMITA DAS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate .....Respondent With (ii) + CONT.CAS(C) 1323/2016 SOUMITA DAS & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates S K SHARMA Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iii) + W.P.(C) 3639/2015 & C.M. 6486/2015 ANOJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY With Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate ..... Respondent (iv) + CONT.CAS(C) 543/2015 W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & connected petition Page 1 of 9 ANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani & Ms. Shruti Bist, Versus Advocates SUDHIR BUDAKOTI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate (v) + W.P.(C) 3694/2015 & C.Ms....


Apr 17 2018

Bijender Singh vs.the Commissioner of Police & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

$~19 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9938/2017 % Date of decision :17. h April, 2018 BIJENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Javed Ahmad, Mr. Anis Ahmad and Mr. Nadeem Khan, Advs. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS..... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, Rajender GNCTD. Insp. Singh, T.I./Khajoori Khas, Traffic Circle and S.I Ram Tirath, Pairvi Officer, Traffic. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has been filed complaining that the respondents are not taking a view on the representation dated 20th July, 2017 (page32) submitted by the petitioner to the authorities.2. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the W.P.(C)No.9938/2017 Page 1 of 2 respondent no.1 to examine the representation dated 20th July, 2017 and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible. Dasti....


Apr 17 2018

J One Jan Samuh Seva Samiti (Ngo) vs.dy Commissioner South Delhi Munic ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:17. h April, 2018 $~ * + W.P.(C) 9816/2017 AKASH BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Navin Kumar Jha, Advoacte versus DY. COMMISSIONER, SDMC AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Standing Counsel for SDMC with Mr. Kamlesh Anand & Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advocates Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil) GNCTD with Ms. Sukriti Ghai, Advocate for R2 & R3 + W.P.(C) 10006/2017, C.M. APPL. 46995/2017, C.M. APPL. 2434/2018 & C.M. APPL. 5987/2018 J ONE JAN SAMUH SEVA SAMITI (NGO) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Navin Kumar Jha, Adv. versus DY COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate Mr. Varun K. Chopra with Mr. Gurtypal Singh, Advocates for R5 & R6 Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Mr. Rishabh Jetley, Mr.Swetan, Advocates for GNCTD Mr. Anuja Kapur, Amicus Curiae WP(C) 9816/2017 & WP(C) 10006/2017 Page 1 of 14 CORAM:-"HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTI...


Apr 17 2018

Savitri Dabas and Ors vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:17. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10301/2016 SAVITRI DABAS & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta and Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajul Jain, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sumit Rana, Advocate DSIIDC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land bearing Khasra No.'s 11//16 min, 12//11, 12, 13, 18 situated in the revenue estate of village Kanjhawala, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referre...


Apr 17 2018

M/S. Maja Personal Care vs.prisha Tubes Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

$~ 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"17th April, 2018 + CM (M) 269/2017 and CM APPL.9040-9041/2017 M/S. MAJA PERSONAL CARE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Advocate with Ms. Kanika Bajaj, Advocate versus PRISHA TUBES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate with Ms. Vandna Aneja, Advocate & Ms. Nisha Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the defendant in the civil suit (CS No.55897/2016) which was instituted by the respondent (plaintiff) on 28.02.2012 seeking recovery of Rs.4,87,731/-. It (defendant) is aggrieved by the order dated 17.10.2016 of the trial court whereby the application of the plaintiff under Order XVIII Rule 17-A read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was allowed and consequently Dheeraj Arora (PW-1) stands recalled for further examination primarily to bring on record a board resolution authorizing the said person to institute the suit for...


Apr 17 2018

Vijay@ Naim Dutt vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-17-2018

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 635/2018 Judgment delivered on:17. 04.2018 VIJAY@ NAIM DUTT versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr Vijay Kinger and Ms Roopa Nagpal Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Hardeep, PS Bhalswa Dairy. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1704.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.07/2017 under SectionsIPC, Police Station Bhalswa Dairy. Subsequently, supplementary chargesheet under SectionsIPC has been filed qua the petitioner.2. It is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.09.2017.3. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant, who is a truck driver, on 05.01.2017, at about 10.15 am, had taken goods for BAIL APPLN. 635/2018 Page 1 of 3 transport, he was intercepted by two persons on a motor-cycle. One of the motor-cyclists iden...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial