Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 52 of about 598 results (0.017 seconds)Parveen @ Monty vs.state
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 19, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: December 04, 2017 CRL.A. 1253/2015 ANIL ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Ankit Mathur, proxy counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dua, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent AND + AND + CRL.A. 1278/2015 ASHISH @ KALI @ AMAR ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Upendra Yogesh, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent CRL.A. 222/2016 PARVEEN @ MONTY ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Mr.Aman Choudhry, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent STATE AND CRL.A. Nos.1253 & 1278 of 2015 and 222 & 542 of 2016 Page 1 of 26 + CRL.A. 542/2016 & CRL.M.A.9188/2016 VINOD @ DADDU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.K.Gandhi, Advocate with appellant in pers...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Gera vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:17. h November, 2017 Order pronounced on:4. h December, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 428/2017 ANIL GERA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Mr. Kartik Khanna Versus Advocates. STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with W/ASI Parvati, P.S. Subhash Place Mr. B.S. Rana, Mr. Satyam Sisodia and Mr. Manish Awasthi Advocates for Complainant. + BAIL APPLN. 429/2017 AKHIL GERA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Mr. Kartik Khanna Versus Advocates. STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with W/ASI Parvati, P.S. Subhash Place Mr. B.S. Rana, Mr. Satyam Sisodia and Mr. Manish Awasthi Advocates for Complainant.1. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL By way of the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred 'Cr.P.C.'), the petitioner seeks grant of Anticipatory Bail in FIR No.35/2017 under BAIL APPLN. 428/2017& 429/2017 Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd vs.gaurav Kindra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision:04. December, 2017 + MAC.APP. 698/2015 SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate Versus GAURAV KINDRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) 1. ORDER Appellant is the Insurer, who is challenging the impugned Award of 10th July, 2015 in this appeal on the ground that instead of 50% addition towards future prospects, 40% addition ought to have been made in view of recent Constitution Benchs judgment in National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & ors. 2017 SCC OnLine SC1270and deduction towards personal expenses of the deceased ought to be half (1/2) and not one third (1/3rd), as the deceased is survived by only one legal heir.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal, as already noted in the impugned order, are that on 2nd October, 2013, deceased Jyoti was a pillion rider on a scooty with her...
Tag this Judgment!Ravi Gopala Krishnan and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~19 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7081/2016 Date of decision :4. h December, 2017 Through :... Petitioners in person ........ Petitioners % RAVI GOPALA KRISHNAN AND ANR UNION OF INDIA AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv. for R-1/UOI Mr. Varun Nischal, Adv. for R- 2/GNCTD Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for R-SDMC Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Aditya Gupta and Ms. Shagun Trisal, Advs. for R- 4/BRPL. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought the following prayers : a. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of a writ of mandamus thereby directing the respondents to ensure that the LED lights installed on Public W.P.(C)No.7081/2016 Page 1 of 4 the to Roads and Streets in South Delhi are functional and further directing take appropriate action against the contractor/vendor for supplying spurious LED lig...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Company Limited vs.vindrawati & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-634 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1132/212 and CM No.18211/2012 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate versus VINDRAWATI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By judgment dated 18.09.2012, on the file of the accident claim case (Case No.31/09), instituted on 05.07.2007 by the first to sixth respondents (collectively, the claimants), the tribunal held inquiry and upheld the contention that Ghanshyam, aged 34 years, had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 02.02.2003, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as truck, bearing registration No.DDL-3174 and died in the consequence on 15.12.2005. It awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.8,73,992/- and fastened the liability on the appellant (insurer) to pay, it having concededly issued an insurance policy covering thir...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.jagbir Kaur & Anr.
Court: Delhi
JAGBIR KAUR & ANR. Through: + MAC APPEAL1712013 JAGBIR KAUR Through: None versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant $~R-631 & 632 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11222012 and CM179792012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus ADITYA AGGARWAL & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-2 / insurance company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case of Jagbir Kaur (claimant) arising out of detailed accident report (DAR) registered on the report of the police pursuant to investigation into first information report (FIR) no.309/2011 of police station R.K. Puram, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 27.07.2012, awarded MACA Nos.1122/2012 & 171/2013 Page 1 of 5 compensation in her faovur in the total sum of Rs.10,49,000/-, fastening the liability on Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. (insurer)...
Tag this Judgment!Bhagrati vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:4. h December, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.12172/2015 BHAGRATI Through Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal and Mr. Sunil ........ Petitioner versus K. Goel, Advocates GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Annirudha Deshmukh, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.281/4(10-11), 282/4(10-03) and 80(2-8), total area 23 bighas 02 biswas having 1/12th share measuring 01 bigha 19 biswas and 03 biswasi, situated in the revenue estate of village Ghari Mandu, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is deem...
Tag this Judgment!Anil vs.state
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 19, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: December 04, 2017 CRL.A. 1253/2015 ANIL ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Ankit Mathur, proxy counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dua, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent AND + AND + CRL.A. 1278/2015 ASHISH @ KALI @ AMAR ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Upendra Yogesh, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent CRL.A. 222/2016 PARVEEN @ MONTY ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Mr.Aman Choudhry, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar PS Vijay Vihar ..... Respondent STATE AND CRL.A. Nos.1253 & 1278 of 2015 and 222 & 542 of 2016 Page 1 of 26 + CRL.A. 542/2016 & CRL.M.A.9188/2016 VINOD @ DADDU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.K.Gandhi, Advocate with appellant in pers...
Tag this Judgment!Micromax Informatics Limited vs.telefonaktiebolget L M Ericsson
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 169/2017 & CM No.40001/2017 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ..... Appellant Date of Decision:04. 12.2017 Through: Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashok K. Aggarwal, Mr. Samrat Nigam, Ms. Radhika, Ms. Snigdha Sharma, Ms. Ritwik Sneha & Mr. Gaurav Priyadarshi, Advs. versus TELEFONAKTIEBOLGET L M ERICSSON ..... Respondent Through: Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv., Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Saya Choudhary, Mr. Mr. Prateek Sehrawat, Mr. Adithya Jayaraj, Mr. Rupin Bahl, Ms. Karunka Kanwar, Mr. Devanshu Khanna & Mr. Ujjwal Sinha, Advs. Ashutosh Kumar, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. On the previous date of hearing, learned senior counsel appearing for the parties were requested to explore the possibility of considering use of the hot tub procedure, devised by Courts abroad, to facilitate appreciation of expert technical evidence, in a shortened procedure. T...
Tag this Judgment!Synergy Measurement Technologies (P) Ltd & Anr. Vs.srb Instruments Pri ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~35 * + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 96/2017 & IAs 14175-76/2017 Date of decision:4th December, 2017 SYNERGY MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES (P) LTD & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.A.Venkateshwar Rao, Ms.Prity Sharma, Ms.Rijata Mohanty and Mr.P. Prabhakar, Advs. versus SRB INSTRUMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR Through: Mr.R.Sathish and Mr.Rajesh ......... RESPONDENTS Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration & Conciliation 1. Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioners praying for setting aside the order dated 13.10.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Arb. No.1/2016 and Arb. No.2/2017 as also seeking termination of the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator and appointment of a new Sole Arbitrator, who is a Chartered Accountant by profession. OMP(T)(COMM) 96/2017 Page 1 2. The petitioners had filed a suit for recov...
Tag this Judgment!