Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 47 of about 598 results (0.010 seconds)Ravinder Singh vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
$~1-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on 1st December,2017 Order pronounced on 5th December,2017 + + + + versus CRL.M.C. 849/2017 BIRENDER SINGH YADAV C B I CRL.M.C. 930/2017 RAVINDER SINGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIO CRL.M.C. 934/2017 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus versus CRL.M.C. 935/2017 MUKESH KUMAR CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Present: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate, Mr. Manish Tiwari, Mr.Anil Kumar, Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for the petitioner with petitioner in person in Crl.M.C. No.849/2017. Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.K. Mittal & Ms. Rachna Maheshwari, Advocates for the petitioner in Crl.M.C. Nos.930/2017, 934/2017 & 935/2017. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate for the CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL CRL.M.C. 849/2017 & conne...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. G. Chaudhuri vs.indira Gandhi National Open University & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 05, 2017 W.P.(C) 8921/2014 DR. G. CHAUDHURI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In this petition, restoration of medical cover in terms Family Health Card issued on 18th June, 2012 and reimbursement of medical bills as well as Foreign Travel Bill/LTC and release of salary for the month of February, 2012, is sought by petitioner.2. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent-University, the stand taken is that petitioners medical health card was inadvertently issued and that petitioner is not entitled to reimbursement of medical bills. It is asserted that petitioner had irregularly drawn an advance of `2 lakhs and W.P.(C) 8921/2014 Page 1 of 3 so, he is not entitled to reimbursement of foreign travel bill and release of salary for the month ...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.jaya Guruwara and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-640 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11462012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, ..... Appellant versus Advocate JAYA GURUWARA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Girish Guruwara, aged 22 years, a bachelor, student of the fourth year of the course leading to the degree of Bachelor of Engineering in Computer Science, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 12.12.2009 due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as one bearing registration no.MP-41H-0149 and died in the consequence. On the accident claim case (MACP no.251/2010), instituted on 24.05.2010 by his parents, first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held inquiry and, by judgment dated 21.08.2012 awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.19,04,500/- fastening the liability to p...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Kumar & Ors. Vs.united India Insurance Company Limited
Court: Delhi
$~R-639 & 639A (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Decided on:5. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11442012 and CM No.18466/2012 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate versus AMIT KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate for R-1 + MAC APPEAL5712013 AMIT KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O. P. Mannie, Advocate versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) By judgment dated 30.05.2012, the motor accident claim 1. tribunal decided the accident claim case (MACT74410/7) which had been instituted on 31.08.2007 seeking compensation under sections MACA Nos.1144/2012 & 571/2013 Page 1 of 5 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries statedly suffered by Amit Kumar, the claimant (respondent no.1 in MAC APP.1144/2002 and appellant in MAC APP.571/2013). By the said...
Tag this Judgment!Energy Efficiency Services Ltd & Anr vs.shaktisinh Gohil
Court: Delhi
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 202/2017 ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LTD & ANR .... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Nitya Versus Advocates Sharma, ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Anip Sachthey, Ms. Ria SHAKTISINH GOHIL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER0512.2017 Sachthey, Advocates % IA144102017 (of the defendant under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) 1. The defendant seeks vacation of the ex parte ad interim order dated 12th May, 2017 restraining the defendant from publishing, broadcasting or telecasting in any manner or communicating to the public the content contained in defendants statements dated 27th March, 2017 and 28th March, 2017.2. The counsel for the plaintiffs appears on advance notice and states that the defendant has filed FAO(OS) No.255/2017 and of which notice has been issued and which is listed next on 15th January, 2018 and in which no stay of the ex parte ad interim order has been granted.3. I have enquired from the counsel for th...
Tag this Judgment!Gulf Dth Fz Llc vs.dishtv India Limited & Others
Court: Delhi
$~2(CS) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :5. h DECEMBER, 2017 CS(COMM) 1236/2016 GULF DTH FZ LLC ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Rajiv Nayar,Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Rishi Agrawala and Ms.Niyati Kohli, Advocates. versus + ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Rohan Swarup, Advocate, for D-1. Mr.Yatinder Garg, Advocate, for D-3. Mr.Saurabh Agarwal with Ms.Komal Mundhra, Advocate, for D-6. Mr.Dhavish Chitkara, Advcoate, for D-7&8 Mr.Sajad Sultan with Mr.Surinder Kant, Advocates, for D-10. DISHTV INDIA LIMITED & OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) IA Nos.86(u/S151CPC) and 86(u/O1R-10 CPC) 1. IA86412017 has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff to issue directions to the Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs Department of Revenue; Ministry of Finance Government of India and its underlings to restrict and prohibit the export of Dish TV, Dish HD Plus, Chang Hong set top boxes (STBs), smart CS (COMM) 1236/2016 Page 1 o...
Tag this Judgment!India Awake for Transparency vs.uoi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10589/2017, C.M. APPL. 43341/2017, 43342/2017 & Decided on:05. 12.2017 43343/2017 INDIA AWAKE FOR TRANSPARENCY .... Petitioner Through: Sh. R. Subramanian, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA REP. BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Sh. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Sneh Suman, Sh. Kartik Rai, Advocates. Sh. Rakesh Tyagi, Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner claims that it has approached this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution in public interest. It describes itself as a non-profit company, primarily focused on working in areas of governance and efficient resource management, whether in the public or private sphere. It seeks directions for strict enforcement of the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting...
Tag this Judgment!Neeraj Kumar vs.state, n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~R-15 to R-17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 05, 2017 CRL.A. 519/2011 NEERAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person. versus STATE, N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent AND + Through: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI H.P.Mudgal PS P.Vihar CRL.A. 520/2011 NEERAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Appellant in person. versus STATE, N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI H.P.Mudgal PS P.Vihar AND + CRL.A. 1005/2011 RAJESH KUMAR & ANR. Through: None. versus ..... Appellants CRL.A. Nos.519, 520 & 1005 of 2011 Page 1 of 8 STATE, N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI H.P.Mudgal PS P.Vihar PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) Crl.A.519/2011 & Crl.M.A.No.4944/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.685/2011 Crl.A.520/2011 & Crl.M.A.No.4945/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.686/2011 1. The appellant/convict Neeraj Kumar has filed these two appeals assailing his conviction and sentence award...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shyam Sunder Kumar Rai & O ...
Court: Delhi
$~R-643 & 644 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11562012 and CM186722012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate Through: versus SHYAM SUNDER KUMAR RAI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 + MAC APPEAL11602012 and CM187112012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus ARUN KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondents in both these appeals were the claimants before the tribunal in claim cases (MACT1030and 1032/10/09) instituted on 20.04.2009. By similar judgments passed on 28.08.2012 in each case, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held that they had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that took place MAC Appeal No.1156/2012 & 1160/2012 Page 1 of 3 on 26.01.2009 at about 02.15 hours d...
Tag this Judgment!Moti Lal vs.national Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-621 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:5. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL10922012 MOTI LAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The motor accident claims tribunal, by its judgment dated 15.02.2011, passed in accident claim case (Suit No.124/2010) of respondent nos. 3 to 5 (the claimants), while awarding compensation on account of death of Rinku in a motor accident that took place on 18.11.2009 due to negligent driving of Dumper Truck bearing registration no.HR-69-0395, fastened the liability to pay on respondent no.1 (insurer). It also granted recovery rights against the appellant and respondent no.2, they being owner and driver of the offending vehicle, on the ground that respondent no.2 was not holding a valid and MAC Appeal No.1092/2012 Page 1 of 2 effective driving licence on ...
Tag this Judgment!