Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 57 of about 598 results (0.020 seconds)Sewak Balkishan Gupta vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:1. t December, 2017 1. CRL.M.C. 4542/2016 & CRL.M.A.18997/2016 SEWAK BALKISHAN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sunil Magoo, Adv. versus THE STATE JITENDER NATH RAJNISH GOENKA KAMAL GAIND RAM PHAL BANSAL ..... Respondent No.1 ..... Respondent No.2 ..... Respondent No.3 ..... Respondent No.4 ..... Respondent No.5 Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State with SI Chanchal Singh, PS- EOW. Mr.Sumit Chander, Adv. with Mr.Mizan Siddiqui, Mr.Jatin Choudhary and Mr.Supreet Prasad, Advs. for R-2.2. CRL.M.C. 223/2017 & CRL.M.A.982/2017 RAM PHAL BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajesh Bansal, Mr.Arun Shrivastava, Mr.Pramod Dayal, Mr.Deepak Dewan, Mr. Vijay K. CRL.M.C.4542/2016, CRL.M.C.223/2017, CRL.M.C.317/2017, CRL.M.C.4544/2016 Page 1 of 20 Gupta, Mr. Mohit Saroha and Ms.Ridhima Bansal, Advs. versus STATE JITENDER NATH SEWAK BALKISHAN GUPTA KAMAL GAIND RAJ...
Tag this Judgment!Century Metal Recycling Private Limited vs.sachin Chhabra & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t December, 2017. CS(COMM) 449/2017, IA No.7571/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC), IA No.9903/2017 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(4) CPC), IA No.9948/2017 and IA No.9949/2017 (both for exemption), IA No.11585/2017 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC), IA No.11586/2017 (under Order XXXVII Rule 7 CPC), IA No.11587/2017 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC), IA No.11588/2017 (under Order XXXVII Rule 7 CPC), IA No.11589/2017 (under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC) and IA No.11590/2017 (under Order XXXVII Rule 7 CPC) CENTURY METAL RECYCLING PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta and Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Advs. Versus SACHIN CHHABRA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Manik Dogra and Mr. Aditya Goyal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has sued under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.2,25,64,500/- jointly and severally from the three defendants, name...
Tag this Judgment!M/S s.b.electric Mart (P) Ltd. Vs.govt.of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~7 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:01. t December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 10342/2017 M/S S.B.ELECTRIC MART (P) LTD. versus Through: Mr.B.S.Maan, Advocate ........ Petitioner GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, advocates for L&B/LAC. Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of the petitioner comprise in khasra No.150(Old)/948 (New) (1-10) and Khasra No.1555 (Old)/1011 (New) (9- 08) total measuring 10 Bighas and 18 biswas in Khewat No.64, situated in the revenue estate of village Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as subject land) is deemed to have lapsed in view of the fact that neither possession of the land has been taken nor compensation has been paid....
Tag this Judgment!Shadab Husain Khan vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~54 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10706/2017 & CM No.43873/2017 Date of decision :1. t December, 2017 % SHADAB HUSAIN KHAN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Arun Thapa, Mr. Vikram Kumar and Ms. Henna Narula, Advs. with petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Mr. Harsh Ahuja and Mr. Kushal Kumar, Advs. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition has been filed in public interest making a grievance that the petitioner is receiving offensive and insulting anonymous messages through the social media. It is complained that despite requests to the respondents, vide letters dated 31st August, 2017 and 1st November, 2017 to intervene in the matter and take W.P.(C)No.10706/2017 Page 1 of 2 action against the website and mobile application involved in sending such messages, n...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.dil Aaferoon Begum & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL3862017 and CM154792017 and 43881/2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate versus DIL AAFEROON BEGUM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mohini, Advocate for R-9 & 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Mohd. Zuvair, a bachelor, aged 22 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 07.08.2014 due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as truck bearing registration no.DL-1M-6011 and died in the consequence. On the accident claim case (MACP1872014), instituted by the first to eight respondents, they including the parents and siblings of the deceased, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held inquiry and, by judgment dated 15.02.2014, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.22,69,000/-. The liability to pay the said amount with interest at the rate of 9% p.a. has been fastene...
Tag this Judgment!Poysha Power Generation p.ltd. Vs.doctor Morepen Ltd. And Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~OS-15 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. 12.2017 CS(COMM) 809/2016 POYSHA POWER GENERATION P.LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Adv. with versus Mr.Simran Mehta and Ms.Priyanka, Advs. DOCTOR MOREPEN LTD. AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through Mr.Ashwini Mata, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mukesh Sharma, Mr.Shivansh Gupta and Mr.Srijan Tiwari, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA No.6775/2017 1. This application is filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking multiple reliefs. The main relief which has been sought is that defendant No.1 be directed to secure the alleged liability which has accrued till date, being the profits from the sale of the product BURNOL from 1.5.2005 till 1.5.2017, by way of a bank guarantee. Other consequential directions are also sought.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing the plaintiffs regist...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar Goswami vs.neelam Khurana
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:24. h November, 2017 Pronounced on:01. t December, 2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 215/2016 & IA No.15562/2016 RAKESH KUMAR GOSWAMI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.C.Mukund, Mr.Mohd. Faris, Mr.Gaurav Kr. and Mr.M.B.Elakkumanan, Advocates. Singh versus NEELAM KHURANA Through : Mr.Manjit Advocate. ..... Respondent Singh Ahluwalia, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1.... Petitioner by this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) impunges the arbitral award dated 21.02.2012 passed by the learned arbitrator in favour of the respondent in the case of Neelam Khurana vs Rajesh Kumar Goswami.2. Before reverting to the grounds of challenge, the factual matrix may be seen :-"a) respondent invoked the arbitration process claiming herself to be rightful, absolute, sole and exclusive owner of the property bearing No.J-3/200, Second Floor, Rajouri Garden, New Delh...
Tag this Judgment!Kamal Gaind vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:1. t December, 2017 1. CRL.M.C. 4542/2016 & CRL.M.A.18997/2016 SEWAK BALKISHAN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sunil Magoo, Adv. versus THE STATE JITENDER NATH RAJNISH GOENKA KAMAL GAIND RAM PHAL BANSAL ..... Respondent No.1 ..... Respondent No.2 ..... Respondent No.3 ..... Respondent No.4 ..... Respondent No.5 Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State with SI Chanchal Singh, PS- EOW. Mr.Sumit Chander, Adv. with Mr.Mizan Siddiqui, Mr.Jatin Choudhary and Mr.Supreet Prasad, Advs. for R-2.2. CRL.M.C. 223/2017 & CRL.M.A.982/2017 RAM PHAL BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajesh Bansal, Mr.Arun Shrivastava, Mr.Pramod Dayal, Mr.Deepak Dewan, Mr. Vijay K. CRL.M.C.4542/2016, CRL.M.C.223/2017, CRL.M.C.317/2017, CRL.M.C.4544/2016 Page 1 of 20 Gupta, Mr. Mohit Saroha and Ms.Ridhima Bansal, Advs. versus STATE JITENDER NATH SEWAK BALKISHAN GUPTA KAMAL GAIND RAJ...
Tag this Judgment!Adwel Advertising Service & Anr. Vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP(COMM) 385/2017 Reserved on:22. d November, 2017 Date of decision:1. t December, 2017 ADWEL ADVERTISING SERVICE & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sandeep Grover, Mr.Vimal Nagrath, Ms.Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Ms.Kaveri Gupta, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Mr.Govind Kumar, Mr.Shivam Goel, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenges the Arbitral Award dated 22nd May, 2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Case No.15/2011.2. The dispute between the parties relate to award of work of construction, maintenance and operation of toilet blocks. The respondent had issued letters of award of toilet sites in favour of the petitioners with OMP(COMM) 385/2017 Page 1 respect to 9 (nine) sites, the det...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjeev Sharma vs.sanjay and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-617 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t December, 2017 + MAC. APPEAL No.1086/2012 and CM Nos.17271/2012, 17273/2012 SANJEEV SHARMA Through: Nemo. versus ..... Appellant SANJAY AND ORS. ..Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R-3. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the tribunal, in a motor accident claim case (Suit No.455/11) instituted on 24.09.2011, seeking compensation for the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 14.08.2011. The tribunal, by judgment dated 20.04.2012, awarded Rs.2,53,378/- as compensation, fastening the liability on the third respondent (insurer) of the offending vehicle to pay, the said amount inclusive of Rs.1,45,900/- towards medical expenses, Rs.9,000/- for special diet and conveyance, Rs.23,478/- for loss of income and Rs.75,000/- under the head of pain and suffering.2. The appeal was filed with the grievance that the award is deficient. ...
Tag this Judgment!