Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 1 of about 598 results (0.020 seconds)Prashant Pranav & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 11598/2017 PRASHANT PRANAV & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Gaurav Gupta and Mr.Jaspal Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Jyoti Dutt Shara, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Anil Kumar Sangal, Mr.Siddharth Sangal and Mr.Abhay Kumar Tayal, Advs. for R-2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) CM472342017 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. WP(C) 11598/2017 & CM472332017 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the recruitment process of Probationary Officers in the W.P. (C) 11598/2017 Page 1 State Bank of India vide advertisement No CRPD/PO/2016-dated 6th February, 2017.2. The petitioners, drawing a reference to the following clauses of the advertisement, submit that the advertisement clearly stipulated that each candidate must qualify in each of ...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh @ Mukku vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~1(DB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: December 23, 2017 CRL.A. 1583/2013 MUKESH @ MUKKU .....Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Kumar, PS Old Delhi Railway Station ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant-Mukesh @ Mukku has impugned the judgment dated 03.02.2012 and the order on sentence dated 08.02.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.71/2010 whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1 Lac and, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for one year.2. According to the prosecution case, on the night of 01.07.2010 at 1/4649-121B, New Modern Shahadra, the Appellant stabbed the deceased-Sanjee...
Tag this Judgment!Daljeet Yadav vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.No.4996/2015 Judgment reserved on :14. h November, 2017 Date of decision :23. d December, 2017 DALJEET YADAV S/O SH. SHIV LAL YADAV R/O83 KHANPUR VILLAGE, NEW DELHI 100 062. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Mehta, Advocate. versus 1. THE STATE THROUGH (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) 2. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: BSES BHAWAN, NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI 110019 THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State with SI Shri Bhagwan, PS Neb Sarai. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks the setting aside of the order dated 17.8.2015 of the learned ASJ, Spl.Court (Elect.) South, Saket Crl. M.C. No.4996/2015 Page 1 of 20 Courts in relation to FIR No.247/12, Police Station Neb Sarai under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003, whereby the petitioner was summ...
Tag this Judgment!Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Vs.delhi Auto General Finance Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* + % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA Nos. 851/2015, 69/2016,76/2016 & 304/2016 Reserved on:15. h December, 2017 Pronounced on:22. d December, 2017 RFA No.851/2015 MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manoj Sharma, Mr. Satinder Bawa and Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Advocates the applicant in CM No.33469/2016. for versus DELHI AUTO GENERAL FINANCE PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, ..... Respondent Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate and Mr. Rhishabh Jetley, Advocate for DHC. + RFA No.69/2016 MEENA KUMARI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manoj Sharma, Mr. Satinder Bawa and Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Advocates the applicant in CM No.33472/2016. for versus RAJENDER KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, ........ RESPONDENTS Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, RFA Nos. 851/2015, 69/2016,76/2016 & 304/2016. Page 1 of 53 + RFA No.76/2016 Advocate Jetley, Advocate for DHC. and Mr. Rhishabh M...
Tag this Judgment!Badi Panchayat Vaish Bise Aggarwal (Regd) vs.sunil Gupta
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI K.S. BHANDARI Date of decision:22. d December, 2017 RC.REV. 18/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj & Mr. J.Mitra, Advs. Versus INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PRINTERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Dewan & Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs. AND + RC.REV. 204/2017 & CM No.15804/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra, Adv. AND + RC.REV. 205/2017 & CM No.15807/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent RC.Rev.Nos.18/2016, 204-08/2017, 303/2017, 318/2017, 396-97/2017 & 519-20/2017 Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India vs.m/s Ashoka -Dsc Katni Bye-Passroad Project Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :15. h December, 2017 Pronounced:22. d December, 2017 + O.M.P. 1666/2014 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Jaswinder Singh, Advocate. versus M/S ASHOKA -DSC KATNI BYE-PASS ROAD PROJECT PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Jay Savla, Mr.Jasdeep Singh Dhillon and Mr.Rajpal Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The learned counsel for the Union of India says-while issuing notice on 23.12.2014 on this petition this Court restricted its notice to claims No.1(a), 1(c) and 4 and no notice was issued for claim no.3. This order was challenged in FAO (OS) No.230/2015 and the Division Bench directed this Court to decide if the notice be issued in respect of the claim no.3 or not, hence request to issue notice on claim No.3.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits on 06.01.2001 the notice inviting tender for construction, operation and maintenance of Katni bypass on BOT basis...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.shivani Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 22, 2017 (i) + MAC.APP. 632/2015 & CM APPL. 14190/2015 (ii) + MAC.APP. 634/2015 & CM APPL. 14194/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellants Versus SHIVANI SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehndiratta, Mr. S.C. Pandey & Mr. Ram Singh, Advocates for respondents-Claimants (iii) + MAC.APP. 735/2015 (iv) + MAC.APP. 739/2015 SHIVANI SHARMA SHIVANI SHARMA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehndiratta, Mr. S.C. Pandey & Mr. Ram Singh, Advocates Versus RAJINDER SINGH & ORS (M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE .....Respondents COMPANY LTD.) Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for respondent-Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP. 632/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 10 1. ORAL In a vehicular accident, which took place on 14th August, 2009, JUDGMENT Vikas Sharma had died and his wife and mother had survived with grievous injuries. For...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. Renu Jain vs.managing Committee of Maharaja Agarsain Public and A ...
Court: Delhi
$~19, 24, 31 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 22, 2017 + W.P.(C) 11592/2017 W.P.(C) 11641/2017 W.P.(C) 11668/2017 W.P.(C) 11680/2017 MRS. RENU JAIN MRS. PRATIBHA GOYAL MRS. SNEH SAINI MRS. MANJU BALA ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate versus MANAGING COMMITTEE OF MAHARAJA AGARSAIN PUBLIC AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Ayush Singh Rajora, Ms.Niti Jain and Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocates for R-2 in W.P.(C) Nos.11592/2017, 11641/2017 & 11680/2017 Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (GNCTD) with Ms.Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for R-2 in W.P.(C) No.11668/2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER ORAL In these petitions, a mandamus is sought to first respondent to pay the arrears of salary to petitioners in terms of orders of 11th February, 2009 and 1st July, 2016. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioners submits that to seek the relief as sought herein, representation has not W.P.(C) No.11592/201...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Rani & Anr vs.lala Joti Pershad Shiv Mandir Trust & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI K.S. BHANDARI Date of decision:22. d December, 2017 RC.REV. 18/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj & Mr. J.Mitra, Advs. Versus INTERNATIONAL SECURITY PRINTERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Dewan & Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs. AND + RC.REV. 204/2017 & CM No.15804/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra, Adv. AND + RC.REV. 205/2017 & CM No.15807/2017 (for stay) FRONTIER SALES ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Versus Mr. Praveey Pahuja, Adv. SUPERIOR EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent RC.Rev.Nos.18/2016, 204-08/2017, 303/2017, 318/2017, 396-97/2017 & 519-20/2017 Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Anup J.Bhambani, Senior Advocate with Ms.Gurmeet Bindra...
Tag this Judgment!Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. & Anr vs.pawan Mant ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 317/2017 & I.A. 5366/2017 SIEMENS PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE INC. & ANR Through: Mr. Shantanu Sahay, Advocate with ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Ravin Galgotia, Advocate. versus PAWAN MANTRI & ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants Date of Decision:22. d December, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Though the defendants initially entered appearance, yet after 7th November, 2017, they stopped appearing and did not file any written statement. Accordingly, they were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 21st December, 2017.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that in view of the judgment of this Court in Satya Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Satya Infra & Estates Pvt. Ltd., 2013 SCC OnLine Del 508, the present suit should be decreed qua the relief of injunction. The relevant portion of the said judgment relied upon by learned counsel for the plaintiffs is reproduced hereinbelow:-"Page 1 of...
Tag this Judgment!