Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 56 of about 598 results (0.020 seconds)Radexpo Ag vs.jayna Time Indus. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~C-36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CO.PET. 182/1999 RADEXPO AG Date of decision:04. 12.2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Abhishek Kumar Rao and Ms.Bhavya Bharti, Advs. versus JAYNA TIME INDUS. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Jawahar Raja and Mr.Chinmay Kanojia, Advs. R-1, 3, 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 433(1)(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as The Act) seeking winding up of the respondent company.2. The brief facts as per the petition are that the respondent has from time to time placed upon the petitioner orders for purchase of raw material, watch components tools and other spares. The said material was being imported by the respondent from the petitioner. The petitioner claims that a sum of SFR345149.30 is undisputably due and payable to the petitioner from the respondent.3. Notice under section 433(e) & (f) and 434 of Act was sent on Co.Pet.182/1999 Page 1 31.12.199...
Tag this Judgment!Munna Khan vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:04. 12.2017 + W.P.(C) 6640/2016 and CM Nos. 27181/2016 and 14498/2017 MUNNA KHAN ........ Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Naresh Thanai, Ms Khushboo Singh and Ms Bharti. : Mr Gautam Narayan and Mr R. A. Iyer for GNCTD. Mr Prem Mishra, LA, DTIDC. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The original petitioner (since deceased) has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a communication dated 18.07.2016 (hereafter the impugned communication), whereby the petitioner has been called upon to vacate the PCO Booth at Platform - D, Inter State Bus Terminal, Anand Vihar, Delhi (hereafter the premises) on or before 31.07.2016.2. The petitioner has also prayed that directions be issued to the respondents to frame a comprehensive policy for grant of licenses for shops, kiosks, b...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Limited vs.prem Wati & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-638 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.1143/212 & CM APPL.18464/2012 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate versus PREM WATI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By judgment dated 27.08.2012, the motor accident claims Tribunal, decided accident claim case (Case No.1394/08) instituted on 16.01.2002, by first to fifth respondents, (collectively, the claimants) and fastened the liability on the appellant (insurer) to pay with interest the amount of compensation in the total sum of Rs.11,28,556/- due to death of Lal Chand, in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on account of negligent driving of tractor- trolley bearing registration No.HR-13-8995.2. The appeal is pressed on the ground that the driver of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid or effective driving licence. MACA11432012 Page 1 of 2 3. On bei...
Tag this Judgment!Jagbir Kaur vs.aditya Aggarwal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
JAGBIR KAUR & ANR. Through: + MAC APPEAL1712013 JAGBIR KAUR Through: None versus ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant $~R-631 & 632 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11222012 and CM179792012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus ADITYA AGGARWAL & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-2 / insurance company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case of Jagbir Kaur (claimant) arising out of detailed accident report (DAR) registered on the report of the police pursuant to investigation into first information report (FIR) no.309/2011 of police station R.K. Puram, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 27.07.2012, awarded MACA Nos.1122/2012 & 171/2013 Page 1 of 5 compensation in her faovur in the total sum of Rs.10,49,000/-, fastening the liability on Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. (insurer)...
Tag this Judgment!Satpal vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:4. h December, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.12166/2015 SATPAL Through Mr. Lalit Kumar Rawal and Mr. Sunil ........ Petitioner K. Goel, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Rohan Mehra, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.281/4(10-11), 282/4(10-03) and 80(2-8), total area 23 bighas 02 biswas having 1/12th share measuring 01 bigha 19 biswas and 03 biswasi, situated in the revenue estate of village Ghari Mandu, Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is deemed to have la...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Shashi Tharoor vs.arnab Goswami and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 253/2017 ..... Plaintiff DR. SHASHI THAROOR Through: Mr. Salman Khurshid, Senior versus Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Mr. Muhammad Ali Khan, Mr. Jaspal Singh, Mr. Namrah Nasir, Ms. Azra Rehman, Mr. Omar Hoda and Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal, Advocates. ..... Defendants ARNAB GOSWAMI AND ANR Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Mr. Debarshi Dutta, Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. Rajat Pradhan and Ms. Sriparna Dutta, Advocates. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Reserved on :24. h October, 2017 Date of Decision:1. t December, 2017 MANMOHAN, J: JUDGMENT I.As. 6674/2017, 8809/2017 and 10378/2017 1. Present suit has been filed seeking compensation and damages from and against the defendants for making defamatory remarks against the plaintiff as well as for permanent and prohibitory CS(OS) 253/2017 Page 1 of 61 injunction restraining the defendants from reporting any news or broadcasting any show related to the death of M...
Tag this Judgment!Rajnish Goenka vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:1. t December, 2017 1. CRL.M.C. 4542/2016 & CRL.M.A.18997/2016 SEWAK BALKISHAN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sunil Magoo, Adv. versus THE STATE JITENDER NATH RAJNISH GOENKA KAMAL GAIND RAM PHAL BANSAL ..... Respondent No.1 ..... Respondent No.2 ..... Respondent No.3 ..... Respondent No.4 ..... Respondent No.5 Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State with SI Chanchal Singh, PS- EOW. Mr.Sumit Chander, Adv. with Mr.Mizan Siddiqui, Mr.Jatin Choudhary and Mr.Supreet Prasad, Advs. for R-2.2. CRL.M.C. 223/2017 & CRL.M.A.982/2017 RAM PHAL BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajesh Bansal, Mr.Arun Shrivastava, Mr.Pramod Dayal, Mr.Deepak Dewan, Mr. Vijay K. CRL.M.C.4542/2016, CRL.M.C.223/2017, CRL.M.C.317/2017, CRL.M.C.4544/2016 Page 1 of 20 Gupta, Mr. Mohit Saroha and Ms.Ridhima Bansal, Advs. versus STATE JITENDER NATH SEWAK BALKISHAN GUPTA KAMAL GAIND RAJ...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Prakash Mithal & Sons vs.delhi Development Authority & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~30 * + O.M.P. (COMM) 430/2017 Date of decision:1st December, 2017 VED PRAKASH MITHAL & SONS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Peeyoosh Kalra, Ms.Sona Babbar and Mr.Deepesh, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. Through Mr.Pawan Mathur, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.14226/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 430/2017 1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 02.08.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator. OMP(COMM) 430/2017 Page 1 2. The disputes between the parties had arisen out of an agreement No.20/EE/RPD-6/2012-13/A/DDA for Development of 153.55 Hectare of land in Sector-36 (Part.) Phase-V, Rohini with sub head i.e. construction of 30 M ROW roads with cement concrete rigid pavement in Sec-36 ...
Tag this Judgment!Savita Pawar vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~R-616 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t December, 2017 + MAC. APPEAL No.1083/2012 SAVITA PAWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Srivastava, Advocate versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. ..Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R-1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the tribunal in a motor accident claim case (Suit No.771/10), instituted by her on 12.04.2007, seeking compensation for the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 25.02.2007. The tribunal, by judgment dated 06.01.2012, held the second respondent, the driver-cum-owner of the motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-3S-AN-1090 to be negligent. It, however, also found the claimant to be guilty of contributory negligence since she had attempted to cross the road from a place where there was no zebra-crossing available, and assessed the contributory negligence to be to the extent of forty ...
Tag this Judgment!Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited vs.kiran Kumari & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-618 & R-619 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. t December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL10892012 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ... Appellant Through: Nemo. versus KIRAN KUMARI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate + MAC APPEAL12522012 KIRAN KUMARI & ORS. ... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus LALIT KUMAR & ANR. Through: Nemo ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Kishan Kumar, aged 31 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 22.09.2008, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Rural Transport Vehicle (RTV) bearing registration No.DL-1V-6972 and died in the consequence. His wife and four other members of the family dependent upon him MACA Nos.1089/2012 & 1252/2012 Page 1 of 4 (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (Suit No.370/2008) on 21.11.2008. Lalit Kumar, driver-cum-owner of RTV and Baj...
Tag this Judgment!