Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 60 of about 598 results (0.018 seconds)Jagpreet Singh & Ors. Vs.new India Assurance Company Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-623 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t December, 2017 + MAC. APPEAL No.1104/2012 JAGPREET SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Nemo. versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R-1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the tribunal in a motor accident claim case (Suit No.883/06/08) instituted on 19.12.2006, seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 15.06.2006 due to negligent driving of tempo bearing registration No.DL-1LC-8847, which was insured against third party risk for the period in question with the first respondent (insurer). The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 19.11.2010, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.1,46,600/- in his favour, holding tempo driver responsible fastening the liability to pay on the insurer. MAC App. No.1104/2012 Page 1 of 3 2. The insu...
Tag this Judgment!Khazan Singh vs.dtc
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15th September, 2017 Pronounced on:1. t December, 2017 + W.P (C) No.3174/2004 KHAZAN SINGH ....... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudershan Rajan, Adv. DTC versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1. There appears, on the face of it, to be so much vacillation, in the stance of the petitioner in the present case from time to time, that it would probably be best to start at the beginning, and, when we come to the end, stop to borrow the timely advice of the Mad Hatter to Alice. The Facts 2. This writ petition is directed against an Award, dated 27th June 2003, of the learned Industrial Tribunal, Karkardooma (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal). Inasmuch as the other applicants, before the learned Tribunal, have not chosen to challenge the impugned Award, the recital of facts hereinafter, shall be limited to the case of the petitioner. The petitioner was one of f...
Tag this Judgment!The United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.samila Khatoon & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-613-614 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. t December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL10732012 and CM206402013 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. D.D. Singh and Mr. ... Appellant versus Navdeep Singh, Advocates PRABHA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None + MAC APPEAL10822012 and CM172402012 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. D.D. Singh and Mr. ... Appellant versus Navdeep Singh, Advocates SAMILA KHATOON & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By these appeals, the insurance company on which the liability to pay the compensation has been fastened questions the common judgment dated 06.07.2012 rendered on the respective claims of the MACA Nos.1073/2012 & 1082/2012 Page 1 of 3 first and second respondent in each case, on account of deaths of their bachelor sons Charan Singh Rawat and Javed in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 27.01.2011 due to the negligent dri...
Tag this Judgment!Unimeditrek Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 12.2017 + W.P.(C) 5474/2017 & CM No.22991/2017 UNIMEDITREK PVT LTD ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sonal Kumar Singh, Mr. Rajat Dasgupta and Ms. Ankita Singh, Advs. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. for R-1, 2 : . For the Respondent(s) CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the rejection of its bid for supply of Automatic Tissue Processor to the pathology institutions on the basis of NIT (Notice Inviting Tender), issued on 16.02.2017, is arbitrary.2. The petitioner is involved in manufacturing and selling of medical equipments. It responded to the tender in question and submitted its bid on 20.03.2017. The bidding process involved two stages i.e. ...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Om Parkash and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 01, 2017 W.P.(C) 10679/2017 & CM No.43791/2017 SHRI OM PARKASH AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Padma Kumar S., Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Himanshu Gautam, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Suparna Srivastava, Advocate and Ms.Alinda Bhowal, Advocate for R-1, R- 3 and R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Vide communication of 1st September, 2015 (Annexure P-16), respondent-Jawahar Lal Nehru University (hereinafter referred to as JNU) had recommended case of petitioners for upgradation of Grade Pay at par with CSS/CSSS to respondent No.1-Ministry of Human Resources Development.2. Learned senior counsel for petitioner submits that even University Grants Commission vide communication of 27th March, 2014 (Annexure P-11) had called upon respondent No.1- Ministry of Human Resources Development to reconsider the matter of allowing...
Tag this Judgment!Kiran Kumari & Ors. Vs.lalit Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~R-618 & R-619 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. t December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL10892012 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ... Appellant Through: Nemo. versus KIRAN KUMARI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate + MAC APPEAL12522012 KIRAN KUMARI & ORS. ... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus LALIT KUMAR & ANR. Through: Nemo ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Kishan Kumar, aged 31 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 22.09.2008, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Rural Transport Vehicle (RTV) bearing registration No.DL-1V-6972 and died in the consequence. His wife and four other members of the family dependent upon him MACA Nos.1089/2012 & 1252/2012 Page 1 of 4 (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (Suit No.370/2008) on 21.11.2008. Lalit Kumar, driver-cum-owner of RTV and Baj...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.shweta Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~R-612 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:01. t December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL10682012 and CM169182012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ... Appellant Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate versus SHWETA SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appeal at hand challenges the award of compensation granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) in favour of the first respondent (claimant) by order dated 05.07.2012 in her accident claim case (suit no.841/2008) instituted on 18.07.2006 for the injuries sustained and the permanent disability suffered in the consequence, in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 08.08.2004 due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as a bus bearing registration no.DL-1PB-0660 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant (insurer) for the period in question.2. After some hearing, the counsel for the appellant was told that in the opin...
Tag this Judgment!College of Vocational Studies vs.kumar Ram Krishna & Ors
Court: Delhi
# 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 12.2017 LPA7642017 & CM No.43698-43701 COLLEGE OF VOCATIONAL STUDIES ..... Appellant versus KUMAR RAM KRISHNA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate : Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Lawania and Mr. Aishwary Tiwari, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate with Mr. Prang Newmai and Ms. Slomita Rai, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent Act, 1865 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, assails the judgment dated 28.08.2017, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.5824/2008 titled as Kumar Ram Krishna vs. LPA7642017 Page 1 of 15 Colleg...
Tag this Judgment!